drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
If a duplicate attribute is found using kset_find_obj(), a reference
to that attribute is returned which needs to be disposed accordingly
using kobject_put(). Move the setting name validation into a separate
function to allow for this change without having to duplicate the
cleanup code for this setting.
As a side note, a very similar bug was fixed in
commit 7295a996fdab ("platform/x86: dell-sysman: Fix reference leak"),
so it seems that the bug was copied from that driver.
Compile-tested only.
Fixes: 1bcad8e510b2 ("platform/x86: think-lmi: Fix issues with duplicate attributes")
Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>
---
drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c
index 4be6f28d4600..3a396b763c49 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c
@@ -1344,6 +1344,24 @@ static void tlmi_release_attr(void)
kset_unregister(tlmi_priv.authentication_kset);
}
+static int tlmi_validate_setting_name(struct kset *attribute_kset, char *name)
+{
+ struct kobject *duplicate;
+
+ if (!strcmp(name, "Reserved"))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ duplicate = kset_find_obj(attribute_kset, name);
+ if (duplicate) {
+ pr_debug("Duplicate attribute name found - %s\n", name);
+ /* kset_find_obj() returns a reference */
+ kobject_put(duplicate);
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int tlmi_sysfs_init(void)
{
int i, ret;
@@ -1372,10 +1390,8 @@ static int tlmi_sysfs_init(void)
continue;
/* check for duplicate or reserved values */
- if (kset_find_obj(tlmi_priv.attribute_kset, tlmi_priv.setting[i]->display_name) ||
- !strcmp(tlmi_priv.setting[i]->display_name, "Reserved")) {
- pr_debug("duplicate or reserved attribute name found - %s\n",
- tlmi_priv.setting[i]->display_name);
+ if (tlmi_validate_setting_name(tlmi_priv.attribute_kset,
+ tlmi_priv.setting[i]->display_name) < 0) {
kfree(tlmi_priv.setting[i]->possible_values);
kfree(tlmi_priv.setting[i]);
tlmi_priv.setting[i] = NULL;
--
2.39.2
Thanks Armin,
On 9/23/23 16:41, Armin Wolf wrote:
> If a duplicate attribute is found using kset_find_obj(), a reference
> to that attribute is returned which needs to be disposed accordingly
> using kobject_put(). Move the setting name validation into a separate
> function to allow for this change without having to duplicate the
> cleanup code for this setting.
> As a side note, a very similar bug was fixed in
> commit 7295a996fdab ("platform/x86: dell-sysman: Fix reference leak"),
> so it seems that the bug was copied from that driver.
>
> Compile-tested only.
>
> Fixes: 1bcad8e510b2 ("platform/x86: think-lmi: Fix issues with duplicate attributes")
> Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c
> index 4be6f28d4600..3a396b763c49 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c
> @@ -1344,6 +1344,24 @@ static void tlmi_release_attr(void)
> kset_unregister(tlmi_priv.authentication_kset);
> }
>
> +static int tlmi_validate_setting_name(struct kset *attribute_kset, char *name)
> +{
> + struct kobject *duplicate;
> +
> + if (!strcmp(name, "Reserved"))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + duplicate = kset_find_obj(attribute_kset, name);
> + if (duplicate) {
> + pr_debug("Duplicate attribute name found - %s\n", name);
> + /* kset_find_obj() returns a reference */
> + kobject_put(duplicate);
> + return -EBUSY;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int tlmi_sysfs_init(void)
> {
> int i, ret;
> @@ -1372,10 +1390,8 @@ static int tlmi_sysfs_init(void)
> continue;
>
> /* check for duplicate or reserved values */
> - if (kset_find_obj(tlmi_priv.attribute_kset, tlmi_priv.setting[i]->display_name) ||
> - !strcmp(tlmi_priv.setting[i]->display_name, "Reserved")) {
> - pr_debug("duplicate or reserved attribute name found - %s\n",
> - tlmi_priv.setting[i]->display_name);
> + if (tlmi_validate_setting_name(tlmi_priv.attribute_kset,
> + tlmi_priv.setting[i]->display_name) < 0) {
> kfree(tlmi_priv.setting[i]->possible_values);
> kfree(tlmi_priv.setting[i]);
> tlmi_priv.setting[i] = NULL;
> --
> 2.39.2
>
Reviewed-by: Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca>
Do you have any reports of our platforms where these are seen? If so I'd like to get it fixed in FW too (and I can get it tested on HW if that helps)
Mark
Am 25.09.23 um 16:00 schrieb Mark Pearson:
> Thanks Armin,
>
> On 9/23/23 16:41, Armin Wolf wrote:
>> If a duplicate attribute is found using kset_find_obj(), a reference
>> to that attribute is returned which needs to be disposed accordingly
>> using kobject_put(). Move the setting name validation into a separate
>> function to allow for this change without having to duplicate the
>> cleanup code for this setting.
>> As a side note, a very similar bug was fixed in
>> commit 7295a996fdab ("platform/x86: dell-sysman: Fix reference leak"),
>> so it seems that the bug was copied from that driver.
>>
>> Compile-tested only.
>>
>> Fixes: 1bcad8e510b2 ("platform/x86: think-lmi: Fix issues with
>> duplicate attributes")
>> Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>
>> ---
>> drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c
>> b/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c
>> index 4be6f28d4600..3a396b763c49 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c
>> @@ -1344,6 +1344,24 @@ static void tlmi_release_attr(void)
>> kset_unregister(tlmi_priv.authentication_kset);
>> }
>>
>> +static int tlmi_validate_setting_name(struct kset *attribute_kset,
>> char *name)
>> +{
>> + struct kobject *duplicate;
>> +
>> + if (!strcmp(name, "Reserved"))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + duplicate = kset_find_obj(attribute_kset, name);
>> + if (duplicate) {
>> + pr_debug("Duplicate attribute name found - %s\n", name);
>> + /* kset_find_obj() returns a reference */
>> + kobject_put(duplicate);
>> + return -EBUSY;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int tlmi_sysfs_init(void)
>> {
>> int i, ret;
>> @@ -1372,10 +1390,8 @@ static int tlmi_sysfs_init(void)
>> continue;
>>
>> /* check for duplicate or reserved values */
>> - if (kset_find_obj(tlmi_priv.attribute_kset,
>> tlmi_priv.setting[i]->display_name) ||
>> - !strcmp(tlmi_priv.setting[i]->display_name, "Reserved")) {
>> - pr_debug("duplicate or reserved attribute name found -
>> %s\n",
>> - tlmi_priv.setting[i]->display_name);
>> + if (tlmi_validate_setting_name(tlmi_priv.attribute_kset,
>> + tlmi_priv.setting[i]->display_name) < 0) {
>> kfree(tlmi_priv.setting[i]->possible_values);
>> kfree(tlmi_priv.setting[i]);
>> tlmi_priv.setting[i] = NULL;
>> --
>> 2.39.2
>>
>
> Reviewed-by: Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca>
>
> Do you have any reports of our platforms where these are seen? If so
> I'd like to get it fixed in FW too (and I can get it tested on HW if
> that helps)
>
> Mark
>
No, i do not have any reports regarding this issue. I stumbled upon this bug by chance, after fixing a similar bug in dell-wmi-sysman.
I suspect that the bug was copied from there to the other drivers, like think-lmi and hp-bioscfg.
Armin Wolf
On Sat, 23 Sep 2023, Armin Wolf wrote:
> If a duplicate attribute is found using kset_find_obj(), a reference
> to that attribute is returned which needs to be disposed accordingly
> using kobject_put(). Move the setting name validation into a separate
> function to allow for this change without having to duplicate the
> cleanup code for this setting.
> As a side note, a very similar bug was fixed in
> commit 7295a996fdab ("platform/x86: dell-sysman: Fix reference leak"),
> so it seems that the bug was copied from that driver.
>
> Compile-tested only.
>
> Fixes: 1bcad8e510b2 ("platform/x86: think-lmi: Fix issues with duplicate attributes")
> Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c
> index 4be6f28d4600..3a396b763c49 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c
> @@ -1344,6 +1344,24 @@ static void tlmi_release_attr(void)
> kset_unregister(tlmi_priv.authentication_kset);
> }
>
> +static int tlmi_validate_setting_name(struct kset *attribute_kset, char *name)
> +{
> + struct kobject *duplicate;
> +
> + if (!strcmp(name, "Reserved"))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + duplicate = kset_find_obj(attribute_kset, name);
> + if (duplicate) {
> + pr_debug("Duplicate attribute name found - %s\n", name);
> + /* kset_find_obj() returns a reference */
> + kobject_put(duplicate);
> + return -EBUSY;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int tlmi_sysfs_init(void)
> {
> int i, ret;
> @@ -1372,10 +1390,8 @@ static int tlmi_sysfs_init(void)
> continue;
>
> /* check for duplicate or reserved values */
> - if (kset_find_obj(tlmi_priv.attribute_kset, tlmi_priv.setting[i]->display_name) ||
> - !strcmp(tlmi_priv.setting[i]->display_name, "Reserved")) {
> - pr_debug("duplicate or reserved attribute name found - %s\n",
> - tlmi_priv.setting[i]->display_name);
> + if (tlmi_validate_setting_name(tlmi_priv.attribute_kset,
> + tlmi_priv.setting[i]->display_name) < 0) {
> kfree(tlmi_priv.setting[i]->possible_values);
> kfree(tlmi_priv.setting[i]);
> tlmi_priv.setting[i] = NULL;
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
There seem to be two more of these in hp-bioscfg.
--
i.
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.