Based on grepping through the source code this driver appears to be
missing a call to drm_atomic_helper_shutdown() at system shutdown time
and at driver unbind time. Among other things, this means that if a
panel is in use that it won't be cleanly powered off at system
shutdown time.
The fact that we should call drm_atomic_helper_shutdown() in the case
of OS shutdown/restart and at driver remove (or unbind) time comes
straight out of the kernel doc "driver instance overview" in
drm_drv.c.
A few notes about this fix:
- When adding drm_atomic_helper_shutdown() to the unbind path, I added
it after drm_kms_helper_poll_fini() since that's when other drivers
seemed to have it.
- Technically with a previous patch, ("drm/atomic-helper:
drm_atomic_helper_shutdown(NULL) should be a noop"), we don't
actually need to check to see if our "drm" pointer is NULL before
calling drm_atomic_helper_shutdown(). We'll leave the "if" test in,
though, so that this patch can land without any dependencies. It
could potentially be removed later.
- This patch also makes sure to set the drvdata to NULL in the case of
bind errors to make sure that shutdown can't access freed data.
Suggested-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
---
This commit is only compile-time tested.
(no changes since v1)
drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c
index 8399256cb5c9..5380fb6c55ae 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c
@@ -300,6 +300,7 @@ static int exynos_drm_bind(struct device *dev)
drm_mode_config_cleanup(drm);
exynos_drm_cleanup_dma(drm);
kfree(private);
+ dev_set_drvdata(dev, NULL);
err_free_drm:
drm_dev_put(drm);
@@ -313,6 +314,7 @@ static void exynos_drm_unbind(struct device *dev)
drm_dev_unregister(drm);
drm_kms_helper_poll_fini(drm);
+ drm_atomic_helper_shutdown(drm);
component_unbind_all(drm->dev, drm);
drm_mode_config_cleanup(drm);
@@ -350,9 +352,18 @@ static int exynos_drm_platform_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
return 0;
}
+static void exynos_drm_platform_shutdown(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct drm_device *drm = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+
+ if (drm)
+ drm_atomic_helper_shutdown(drm);
+}
+
static struct platform_driver exynos_drm_platform_driver = {
.probe = exynos_drm_platform_probe,
.remove = exynos_drm_platform_remove,
+ .shutdown = exynos_drm_platform_shutdown,
.driver = {
.name = "exynos-drm",
.pm = &exynos_drm_pm_ops,
--
2.42.0.515.g380fc7ccd1-goog
On 21.09.2023 21:26, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> Based on grepping through the source code this driver appears to be
> missing a call to drm_atomic_helper_shutdown() at system shutdown time
> and at driver unbind time. Among other things, this means that if a
> panel is in use that it won't be cleanly powered off at system
> shutdown time.
>
> The fact that we should call drm_atomic_helper_shutdown() in the case
> of OS shutdown/restart and at driver remove (or unbind) time comes
> straight out of the kernel doc "driver instance overview" in
> drm_drv.c.
>
> A few notes about this fix:
> - When adding drm_atomic_helper_shutdown() to the unbind path, I added
> it after drm_kms_helper_poll_fini() since that's when other drivers
> seemed to have it.
> - Technically with a previous patch, ("drm/atomic-helper:
> drm_atomic_helper_shutdown(NULL) should be a noop"), we don't
> actually need to check to see if our "drm" pointer is NULL before
> calling drm_atomic_helper_shutdown(). We'll leave the "if" test in,
> though, so that this patch can land without any dependencies. It
> could potentially be removed later.
> - This patch also makes sure to set the drvdata to NULL in the case of
> bind errors to make sure that shutdown can't access freed data.
>
> Suggested-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Seems to be working fine on all my test Exynos-based boards with display.
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
> ---
> This commit is only compile-time tested.
>
> (no changes since v1)
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c
> index 8399256cb5c9..5380fb6c55ae 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c
> @@ -300,6 +300,7 @@ static int exynos_drm_bind(struct device *dev)
> drm_mode_config_cleanup(drm);
> exynos_drm_cleanup_dma(drm);
> kfree(private);
> + dev_set_drvdata(dev, NULL);
> err_free_drm:
> drm_dev_put(drm);
>
> @@ -313,6 +314,7 @@ static void exynos_drm_unbind(struct device *dev)
> drm_dev_unregister(drm);
>
> drm_kms_helper_poll_fini(drm);
> + drm_atomic_helper_shutdown(drm);
>
> component_unbind_all(drm->dev, drm);
> drm_mode_config_cleanup(drm);
> @@ -350,9 +352,18 @@ static int exynos_drm_platform_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void exynos_drm_platform_shutdown(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct drm_device *drm = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> + if (drm)
> + drm_atomic_helper_shutdown(drm);
> +}
> +
> static struct platform_driver exynos_drm_platform_driver = {
> .probe = exynos_drm_platform_probe,
> .remove = exynos_drm_platform_remove,
> + .shutdown = exynos_drm_platform_shutdown,
> .driver = {
> .name = "exynos-drm",
> .pm = &exynos_drm_pm_ops,
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Thanks for testing. :)
Acked-by : Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
2023년 9월 22일 (금) 오후 3:00, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>님이 작성:
>
>
> On 21.09.2023 21:26, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> > Based on grepping through the source code this driver appears to be
> > missing a call to drm_atomic_helper_shutdown() at system shutdown time
> > and at driver unbind time. Among other things, this means that if a
> > panel is in use that it won't be cleanly powered off at system
> > shutdown time.
> >
> > The fact that we should call drm_atomic_helper_shutdown() in the case
> > of OS shutdown/restart and at driver remove (or unbind) time comes
> > straight out of the kernel doc "driver instance overview" in
> > drm_drv.c.
> >
> > A few notes about this fix:
> > - When adding drm_atomic_helper_shutdown() to the unbind path, I added
> > it after drm_kms_helper_poll_fini() since that's when other drivers
> > seemed to have it.
> > - Technically with a previous patch, ("drm/atomic-helper:
> > drm_atomic_helper_shutdown(NULL) should be a noop"), we don't
> > actually need to check to see if our "drm" pointer is NULL before
> > calling drm_atomic_helper_shutdown(). We'll leave the "if" test in,
> > though, so that this patch can land without any dependencies. It
> > could potentially be removed later.
> > - This patch also makes sure to set the drvdata to NULL in the case of
> > bind errors to make sure that shutdown can't access freed data.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
>
> Seems to be working fine on all my test Exynos-based boards with display.
>
> Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
>
> > ---
> > This commit is only compile-time tested.
> >
> > (no changes since v1)
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c | 11 +++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c
> > index 8399256cb5c9..5380fb6c55ae 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c
> > @@ -300,6 +300,7 @@ static int exynos_drm_bind(struct device *dev)
> > drm_mode_config_cleanup(drm);
> > exynos_drm_cleanup_dma(drm);
> > kfree(private);
> > + dev_set_drvdata(dev, NULL);
> > err_free_drm:
> > drm_dev_put(drm);
> >
> > @@ -313,6 +314,7 @@ static void exynos_drm_unbind(struct device *dev)
> > drm_dev_unregister(drm);
> >
> > drm_kms_helper_poll_fini(drm);
> > + drm_atomic_helper_shutdown(drm);
> >
> > component_unbind_all(drm->dev, drm);
> > drm_mode_config_cleanup(drm);
> > @@ -350,9 +352,18 @@ static int exynos_drm_platform_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static void exynos_drm_platform_shutdown(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct drm_device *drm = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > +
> > + if (drm)
> > + drm_atomic_helper_shutdown(drm);
> > +}
> > +
> > static struct platform_driver exynos_drm_platform_driver = {
> > .probe = exynos_drm_platform_probe,
> > .remove = exynos_drm_platform_remove,
> > + .shutdown = exynos_drm_platform_shutdown,
> > .driver = {
> > .name = "exynos-drm",
> > .pm = &exynos_drm_pm_ops,
>
> Best regards
> --
> Marek Szyprowski, PhD
> Samsung R&D Institute Poland
>
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 7:20 PM Inki Dae <daeinki@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for testing. :)
>
> Acked-by : Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
Inki: does that mean you'd like this to go through drm-misc? I'm happy
to do that, but there are no dependencies here so this could easily go
through your tree.
> 2023년 9월 22일 (금) 오후 3:00, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>님이 작성:
> >
> >
> > On 21.09.2023 21:26, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> > > Based on grepping through the source code this driver appears to be
> > > missing a call to drm_atomic_helper_shutdown() at system shutdown time
> > > and at driver unbind time. Among other things, this means that if a
> > > panel is in use that it won't be cleanly powered off at system
> > > shutdown time.
> > >
> > > The fact that we should call drm_atomic_helper_shutdown() in the case
> > > of OS shutdown/restart and at driver remove (or unbind) time comes
> > > straight out of the kernel doc "driver instance overview" in
> > > drm_drv.c.
> > >
> > > A few notes about this fix:
> > > - When adding drm_atomic_helper_shutdown() to the unbind path, I added
> > > it after drm_kms_helper_poll_fini() since that's when other drivers
> > > seemed to have it.
> > > - Technically with a previous patch, ("drm/atomic-helper:
> > > drm_atomic_helper_shutdown(NULL) should be a noop"), we don't
> > > actually need to check to see if our "drm" pointer is NULL before
> > > calling drm_atomic_helper_shutdown(). We'll leave the "if" test in,
> > > though, so that this patch can land without any dependencies. It
> > > could potentially be removed later.
> > > - This patch also makes sure to set the drvdata to NULL in the case of
> > > bind errors to make sure that shutdown can't access freed data.
> > >
> > > Suggested-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> >
> > Seems to be working fine on all my test Exynos-based boards with display.
> >
> > Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
> >
> > > ---
> > > This commit is only compile-time tested.
> > >
> > > (no changes since v1)
> > >
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c | 11 +++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c
> > > index 8399256cb5c9..5380fb6c55ae 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c
> > > @@ -300,6 +300,7 @@ static int exynos_drm_bind(struct device *dev)
> > > drm_mode_config_cleanup(drm);
> > > exynos_drm_cleanup_dma(drm);
> > > kfree(private);
> > > + dev_set_drvdata(dev, NULL);
> > > err_free_drm:
> > > drm_dev_put(drm);
> > >
> > > @@ -313,6 +314,7 @@ static void exynos_drm_unbind(struct device *dev)
> > > drm_dev_unregister(drm);
> > >
> > > drm_kms_helper_poll_fini(drm);
> > > + drm_atomic_helper_shutdown(drm);
> > >
> > > component_unbind_all(drm->dev, drm);
> > > drm_mode_config_cleanup(drm);
> > > @@ -350,9 +352,18 @@ static int exynos_drm_platform_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static void exynos_drm_platform_shutdown(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > +{
> > > + struct drm_device *drm = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > > +
> > > + if (drm)
> > > + drm_atomic_helper_shutdown(drm);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static struct platform_driver exynos_drm_platform_driver = {
> > > .probe = exynos_drm_platform_probe,
> > > .remove = exynos_drm_platform_remove,
> > > + .shutdown = exynos_drm_platform_shutdown,
> > > .driver = {
> > > .name = "exynos-drm",
> > > .pm = &exynos_drm_pm_ops,
> >
> > Best regards
> > --
> > Marek Szyprowski, PhD
> > Samsung R&D Institute Poland
> >
Hi,
2023년 10월 6일 (금) 오후 10:51, Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>님이 작성:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 7:20 PM Inki Dae <daeinki@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for testing. :)
> >
> > Acked-by : Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
>
> Inki: does that mean you'd like this to go through drm-misc? I'm happy
> to do that, but there are no dependencies here so this could easily go
> through your tree.
Ah, you are right. No dependency here. I will pick it up.
Thanks,
Inki Dae
>
>
> > 2023년 9월 22일 (금) 오후 3:00, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>님이 작성:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 21.09.2023 21:26, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> > > > Based on grepping through the source code this driver appears to be
> > > > missing a call to drm_atomic_helper_shutdown() at system shutdown time
> > > > and at driver unbind time. Among other things, this means that if a
> > > > panel is in use that it won't be cleanly powered off at system
> > > > shutdown time.
> > > >
> > > > The fact that we should call drm_atomic_helper_shutdown() in the case
> > > > of OS shutdown/restart and at driver remove (or unbind) time comes
> > > > straight out of the kernel doc "driver instance overview" in
> > > > drm_drv.c.
> > > >
> > > > A few notes about this fix:
> > > > - When adding drm_atomic_helper_shutdown() to the unbind path, I added
> > > > it after drm_kms_helper_poll_fini() since that's when other drivers
> > > > seemed to have it.
> > > > - Technically with a previous patch, ("drm/atomic-helper:
> > > > drm_atomic_helper_shutdown(NULL) should be a noop"), we don't
> > > > actually need to check to see if our "drm" pointer is NULL before
> > > > calling drm_atomic_helper_shutdown(). We'll leave the "if" test in,
> > > > though, so that this patch can land without any dependencies. It
> > > > could potentially be removed later.
> > > > - This patch also makes sure to set the drvdata to NULL in the case of
> > > > bind errors to make sure that shutdown can't access freed data.
> > > >
> > > > Suggested-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> > >
> > > Seems to be working fine on all my test Exynos-based boards with display.
> > >
> > > Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
> > >
> > > > ---
> > > > This commit is only compile-time tested.
> > > >
> > > > (no changes since v1)
> > > >
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c | 11 +++++++++++
> > > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c
> > > > index 8399256cb5c9..5380fb6c55ae 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c
> > > > @@ -300,6 +300,7 @@ static int exynos_drm_bind(struct device *dev)
> > > > drm_mode_config_cleanup(drm);
> > > > exynos_drm_cleanup_dma(drm);
> > > > kfree(private);
> > > > + dev_set_drvdata(dev, NULL);
> > > > err_free_drm:
> > > > drm_dev_put(drm);
> > > >
> > > > @@ -313,6 +314,7 @@ static void exynos_drm_unbind(struct device *dev)
> > > > drm_dev_unregister(drm);
> > > >
> > > > drm_kms_helper_poll_fini(drm);
> > > > + drm_atomic_helper_shutdown(drm);
> > > >
> > > > component_unbind_all(drm->dev, drm);
> > > > drm_mode_config_cleanup(drm);
> > > > @@ -350,9 +352,18 @@ static int exynos_drm_platform_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > return 0;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > +static void exynos_drm_platform_shutdown(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct drm_device *drm = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > > > +
> > > > + if (drm)
> > > > + drm_atomic_helper_shutdown(drm);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > static struct platform_driver exynos_drm_platform_driver = {
> > > > .probe = exynos_drm_platform_probe,
> > > > .remove = exynos_drm_platform_remove,
> > > > + .shutdown = exynos_drm_platform_shutdown,
> > > > .driver = {
> > > > .name = "exynos-drm",
> > > > .pm = &exynos_drm_pm_ops,
> > >
> > > Best regards
> > > --
> > > Marek Szyprowski, PhD
> > > Samsung R&D Institute Poland
> > >
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.