[PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: ti: Enable support for overlays for relevant boards

Roger Quadros posted 2 patches 2 years, 4 months ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: ti: Enable support for overlays for relevant boards
Posted by Roger Quadros 2 years, 4 months ago
Enable __symbols__ in board DT files for which we expect
overlays to be supported.

Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/Makefile | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/Makefile
index e7b8e2e7f083..06d6f264f292 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/Makefile
@@ -72,8 +72,16 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_K3) += k3-am69-sk.dtb
 dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_K3) += k3-j784s4-evm.dtb
 
 # Enable support for device-tree overlays
+DTC_FLAGS_k3-am625-beagleplay += -@
 DTC_FLAGS_k3-am625-sk += -@
 DTC_FLAGS_k3-am62-lp-sk += -@
+DTC_FLAGS_k3-am62a7-sk += -@
+DTC_FLAGS_k3-am642-evm += -@
+DTC_FLAGS_k3-am654-base-board += -@
 DTC_FLAGS_k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced-m2 += -@
+DTC_FLAGS_k3-am68-sk-base-board += -@
+DTC_FLAGS_k3-am69-sk += -@
 DTC_FLAGS_k3-j721e-common-proc-board += -@
+DTC_FLAGS_k3-j721e-sk += -@
 DTC_FLAGS_k3-j721s2-common-proc-board += -@
+DTC_FLAGS_k3-j784s4-evm += -@
-- 
2.34.1
Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: ti: Enable support for overlays for relevant boards
Posted by Nishanth Menon 2 years, 4 months ago
On 16:34-20230920, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Enable __symbols__ in board DT files for which we expect
> overlays to be supported.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/Makefile | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/Makefile
> index e7b8e2e7f083..06d6f264f292 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/Makefile
> @@ -72,8 +72,16 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_K3) += k3-am69-sk.dtb
>  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_K3) += k3-j784s4-evm.dtb
>  
>  # Enable support for device-tree overlays
> +DTC_FLAGS_k3-am625-beagleplay += -@
>  DTC_FLAGS_k3-am625-sk += -@
>  DTC_FLAGS_k3-am62-lp-sk += -@
> +DTC_FLAGS_k3-am62a7-sk += -@
> +DTC_FLAGS_k3-am642-evm += -@
> +DTC_FLAGS_k3-am654-base-board += -@
>  DTC_FLAGS_k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced-m2 += -@
> +DTC_FLAGS_k3-am68-sk-base-board += -@
> +DTC_FLAGS_k3-am69-sk += -@
>  DTC_FLAGS_k3-j721e-common-proc-board += -@
> +DTC_FLAGS_k3-j721e-sk += -@
>  DTC_FLAGS_k3-j721s2-common-proc-board += -@
> +DTC_FLAGS_k3-j784s4-evm += -@

is'nt it better to do it in context of the changes introduced?

-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3  1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D
Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: ti: Enable support for overlays for relevant boards
Posted by Roger Quadros 2 years, 4 months ago

On 20/09/2023 16:57, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 16:34-20230920, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> Enable __symbols__ in board DT files for which we expect
>> overlays to be supported.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/Makefile | 8 ++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/Makefile
>> index e7b8e2e7f083..06d6f264f292 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/Makefile
>> @@ -72,8 +72,16 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_K3) += k3-am69-sk.dtb
>>  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_K3) += k3-j784s4-evm.dtb
>>  
>>  # Enable support for device-tree overlays
>> +DTC_FLAGS_k3-am625-beagleplay += -@
>>  DTC_FLAGS_k3-am625-sk += -@
>>  DTC_FLAGS_k3-am62-lp-sk += -@
>> +DTC_FLAGS_k3-am62a7-sk += -@
>> +DTC_FLAGS_k3-am642-evm += -@
>> +DTC_FLAGS_k3-am654-base-board += -@
>>  DTC_FLAGS_k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced-m2 += -@
>> +DTC_FLAGS_k3-am68-sk-base-board += -@
>> +DTC_FLAGS_k3-am69-sk += -@
>>  DTC_FLAGS_k3-j721e-common-proc-board += -@
>> +DTC_FLAGS_k3-j721e-sk += -@
>>  DTC_FLAGS_k3-j721s2-common-proc-board += -@
>> +DTC_FLAGS_k3-j784s4-evm += -@
> 
> is'nt it better to do it in context of the changes introduced?
> 

Do you mean I should just add for the particular platform when
adding an overlay for that platform?

-- 
cheers,
-roger