sound/soc/dwc/dwc-i2s.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
This fixes typo in comment
Signed-off-by: Myunguk Kim <mwkim@gaonchips.com>
---
sound/soc/dwc/dwc-i2s.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/dwc/dwc-i2s.c b/sound/soc/dwc/dwc-i2s.c
index 71ff894035a4..45e55e550924 100644
--- a/sound/soc/dwc/dwc-i2s.c
+++ b/sound/soc/dwc/dwc-i2s.c
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ static irqreturn_t i2s_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
irq_valid = true;
}
- /* Error Handling: TX */
+ /* Error Handling: RX */
if (isr[i] & ISR_RXFO)
{ dev_err_ratelimited(dev->dev, "RX overrun (ch_id=%d)\n", i);
irq_valid = true;
--
2.34.1
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 03:46:46PM +0900, Myunguk Kim wrote: > This fixes typo in comment > > Signed-off-by: Myunguk Kim <mwkim@gaonchips.com> This doesn't apply against current code, please check and resend: Applying: ASoC: dwc: fix typo in comment error: sha1 information is lacking or useless (sound/soc/dwc/dwc-i2s.c). error: could not build fake ancestor Patch failed at 0001 ASoC: dwc: fix typo in comment (after fixing what looked like corruption in the mail)
> This doesn't apply against current code, please check and resend: Sorry, I will send a clean v2 in a moment.
On 11.09.2023 09:46, Myunguk Kim wrote: > This fixes typo in comment > > Signed-off-by: Myunguk Kim <mwkim@gaonchips.com> Reviewed-by: Maxim Kochetkov <fido_max@inbox.ru>
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 03:46:46PM +0900, Myunguk Kim wrote:
> This fixes typo in comment
On what? Can you describe the typofix in more detail?
>
> Signed-off-by: Myunguk Kim <mwkim@gaonchips.com>
> ---
> sound/soc/dwc/dwc-i2s.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/dwc/dwc-i2s.c b/sound/soc/dwc/dwc-i2s.c
> index 71ff894035a4..45e55e550924 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/dwc/dwc-i2s.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/dwc/dwc-i2s.c
> @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ static irqreturn_t i2s_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> irq_valid = true;
> }
>
> - /* Error Handling: TX */
> + /* Error Handling: RX */
> if (isr[i] & ISR_RXFO)
> { dev_err_ratelimited(dev->dev, "RX overrun (ch_id=%d)\n", i);
> irq_valid = true;
Oh, you mean the code following the comment checks for RXFO overrun.
Confused...
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.