[PATCH V2 5/6] pinctrl: sprd: Increase the range of register values

Linhua Xu posted 6 patches 2 years, 3 months ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH V2 5/6] pinctrl: sprd: Increase the range of register values
Posted by Linhua Xu 2 years, 3 months ago
From: Linhua Xu <Linhua.Xu@unisoc.com>

As the UNISOC pin controller version iterates, more registers are required
to meet new functional requirements. Thus modify them.

Signed-off-by: Linhua Xu <Linhua.Xu@unisoc.com>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.h | 30 +++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.h b/drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.h
index a696f81ce663..5357874186fd 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.h
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.h
@@ -7,30 +7,32 @@
 #ifndef __PINCTRL_SPRD_H__
 #define __PINCTRL_SPRD_H__
 
+#include <linux/bits.h>
+
 struct platform_device;
 
-#define NUM_OFFSET	(20)
-#define TYPE_OFFSET	(16)
-#define BIT_OFFSET	(8)
-#define WIDTH_OFFSET	(4)
+#define NUM_OFFSET	22
+#define TYPE_OFFSET	18
+#define BIT_OFFSET	10
+#define WIDTH_OFFSET	6
 
 #define SPRD_PIN_INFO(num, type, offset, width, reg)	\
-		(((num) & 0xFFF) << NUM_OFFSET |	\
-		 ((type) & 0xF) << TYPE_OFFSET |	\
-		 ((offset) & 0xFF) << BIT_OFFSET |	\
-		 ((width) & 0xF) << WIDTH_OFFSET |	\
-		 ((reg) & 0xF))
+		(((num) & GENMASK(10, 0)) << NUM_OFFSET |	\
+		 ((type) & GENMASK(3, 0)) << TYPE_OFFSET |	\
+		 ((offset) & GENMASK(7, 0)) << BIT_OFFSET |	\
+		 ((width) & GENMASK(3, 0)) << WIDTH_OFFSET |	\
+		 ((reg) & GENMASK(5, 0)))
 
 #define SPRD_PINCTRL_PIN(pin)	SPRD_PINCTRL_PIN_DATA(pin, #pin)
 
 #define SPRD_PINCTRL_PIN_DATA(a, b)				\
 	{							\
 		.name = b,					\
-		.num = (((a) >> NUM_OFFSET) & 0xfff),		\
-		.type = (((a) >> TYPE_OFFSET) & 0xf),		\
-		.bit_offset = (((a) >> BIT_OFFSET) & 0xff),	\
-		.bit_width = ((a) >> WIDTH_OFFSET & 0xf),	\
-		.reg = ((a) & 0xf)				\
+		.num = (((a) & GENMASK(31, 22)) >> NUM_OFFSET),	\
+		.type = (((a) & GENMASK(21, 18)) >> TYPE_OFFSET),	\
+		.bit_offset = (((a) & GENMASK(17, 10)) >> BIT_OFFSET),	\
+		.bit_width = (((a) & GENMASK(9, 6)) >> WIDTH_OFFSET),	\
+		.reg = ((a) & GENMASK(5, 0))				\
 	}
 
 enum pin_type {
-- 
2.17.1
Re: [PATCH V2 5/6] pinctrl: sprd: Increase the range of register values
Posted by Baolin Wang 2 years, 3 months ago

On 9/8/2023 1:51 PM, Linhua Xu wrote:
> From: Linhua Xu <Linhua.Xu@unisoc.com>
> 
> As the UNISOC pin controller version iterates, more registers are required
> to meet new functional requirements. Thus modify them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Linhua Xu <Linhua.Xu@unisoc.com>
> ---
>   drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.h | 30 +++++++++++++++--------------
>   1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.h b/drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.h
> index a696f81ce663..5357874186fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.h
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.h
> @@ -7,30 +7,32 @@
>   #ifndef __PINCTRL_SPRD_H__
>   #define __PINCTRL_SPRD_H__
>   
> +#include <linux/bits.h>
> +
>   struct platform_device;
>   
> -#define NUM_OFFSET	(20)
> -#define TYPE_OFFSET	(16)
> -#define BIT_OFFSET	(8)
> -#define WIDTH_OFFSET	(4)
> +#define NUM_OFFSET	22
> +#define TYPE_OFFSET	18
> +#define BIT_OFFSET	10
> +#define WIDTH_OFFSET	6
>   
>   #define SPRD_PIN_INFO(num, type, offset, width, reg)	\
> -		(((num) & 0xFFF) << NUM_OFFSET |	\
> -		 ((type) & 0xF) << TYPE_OFFSET |	\
> -		 ((offset) & 0xFF) << BIT_OFFSET |	\
> -		 ((width) & 0xF) << WIDTH_OFFSET |	\
> -		 ((reg) & 0xF))
> +		(((num) & GENMASK(10, 0)) << NUM_OFFSET |	\
> +		 ((type) & GENMASK(3, 0)) << TYPE_OFFSET |	\
> +		 ((offset) & GENMASK(7, 0)) << BIT_OFFSET |	\
> +		 ((width) & GENMASK(3, 0)) << WIDTH_OFFSET |	\
> +		 ((reg) & GENMASK(5, 0)))

Can you define some readable macro for the mask bits?

>   
>   #define SPRD_PINCTRL_PIN(pin)	SPRD_PINCTRL_PIN_DATA(pin, #pin)
>   
>   #define SPRD_PINCTRL_PIN_DATA(a, b)				\
>   	{							\
>   		.name = b,					\
> -		.num = (((a) >> NUM_OFFSET) & 0xfff),		\
> -		.type = (((a) >> TYPE_OFFSET) & 0xf),		\
> -		.bit_offset = (((a) >> BIT_OFFSET) & 0xff),	\
> -		.bit_width = ((a) >> WIDTH_OFFSET & 0xf),	\
> -		.reg = ((a) & 0xf)				\
> +		.num = (((a) & GENMASK(31, 22)) >> NUM_OFFSET),	\
> +		.type = (((a) & GENMASK(21, 18)) >> TYPE_OFFSET),	\
> +		.bit_offset = (((a) & GENMASK(17, 10)) >> BIT_OFFSET),	\
> +		.bit_width = (((a) & GENMASK(9, 6)) >> WIDTH_OFFSET),	\
> +		.reg = ((a) & GENMASK(5, 0))				\

Please keep the same logic operation as before, and you can reuse the 
readable macros if you defined.

>   	}
>   
>   enum pin_type {
Re: [PATCH V2 5/6] pinctrl: sprd: Increase the range of register values
Posted by Andy Shevchenko 2 years, 3 months ago
On Fri, Sep 08, 2023 at 01:51:45PM +0800, Linhua Xu wrote:
> From: Linhua Xu <Linhua.Xu@unisoc.com>
> 
> As the UNISOC pin controller version iterates, more registers are required
> to meet new functional requirements. Thus modify them.

LGTM,
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko