Documentation/process/applying-patches.rst | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
cc: jesper.juhl@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
---
Documentation/process/applying-patches.rst | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/process/applying-patches.rst b/Documentation/process/applying-patches.rst
index c269f5e1a0a3..201b9900bffe 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/applying-patches.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/applying-patches.rst
@@ -6,6 +6,13 @@ Applying Patches To The Linux Kernel
Original by:
Jesper Juhl, August 2005
+
+.. applying patch by Git::
+
+ You can use the below syntax to patch in git repository
+ git-apply --whitespace=error-all <patchfile>
+
+
.. note::
This document is obsolete. In most cases, rather than using ``patch``
--
2.41.0
Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com> writes: > cc: jesper.juhl@gmail.com > > Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com> > --- > Documentation/process/applying-patches.rst | 7 +++++++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/process/applying-patches.rst b/Documentation/process/applying-patches.rst > index c269f5e1a0a3..201b9900bffe 100644 > --- a/Documentation/process/applying-patches.rst > +++ b/Documentation/process/applying-patches.rst > @@ -6,6 +6,13 @@ Applying Patches To The Linux Kernel > Original by: > Jesper Juhl, August 2005 > > + > +.. applying patch by Git:: > + > + You can use the below syntax to patch in git repository > + git-apply --whitespace=error-all <patchfile> > + > + > .. note:: > > This document is obsolete. In most cases, rather than using ``patch`` So why are you sending a patch ... with no changelog ... adding a useless label ... and Sphinx syntax errors ... to a document that is explicitly marked as being obsolete? jon
On 06:48 Thu 07 Sep 2023, Jonathan Corbet wrote: >Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com> writes: > >> cc: jesper.juhl@gmail.com >> >> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com> >> --- >> Documentation/process/applying-patches.rst | 7 +++++++ >> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/process/applying-patches.rst b/Documentation/process/applying-patches.rst >> index c269f5e1a0a3..201b9900bffe 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/process/applying-patches.rst >> +++ b/Documentation/process/applying-patches.rst >> @@ -6,6 +6,13 @@ Applying Patches To The Linux Kernel >> Original by: >> Jesper Juhl, August 2005 >> >> + >> +.. applying patch by Git:: >> + >> + You can use the below syntax to patch in git repository >> + git-apply --whitespace=error-all <patchfile> >> + >> + >> .. note:: >> >> This document is obsolete. In most cases, rather than using ``patch`` > >So why are you sending a patch ... with no changelog My bad. Realized it once send it. >to a document that is explicitly marked as being obsolete? I thought if people visit that page , that note might help. Are we taking out that page from the doc? Why that page is still there? >jon -- Thanks, Bhaskar "Here's looking at you kid"-- Casablanca https://about.me/unixbhaskar
Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com> writes: > On 06:48 Thu 07 Sep 2023, Jonathan Corbet wrote: >>Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> cc: jesper.juhl@gmail.com >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com> >>> --- >>> Documentation/process/applying-patches.rst | 7 +++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/process/applying-patches.rst b/Documentation/process/applying-patches.rst >>> index c269f5e1a0a3..201b9900bffe 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/process/applying-patches.rst >>> +++ b/Documentation/process/applying-patches.rst >>> @@ -6,6 +6,13 @@ Applying Patches To The Linux Kernel >>> Original by: >>> Jesper Juhl, August 2005 >>> >>> + >>> +.. applying patch by Git:: >>> + >>> + You can use the below syntax to patch in git repository >>> + git-apply --whitespace=error-all <patchfile> >>> + >>> + >>> .. note:: >>> >>> This document is obsolete. In most cases, rather than using ``patch`` >> >>So why are you sending a patch ... with no changelog > > My bad. Realized it once send it. > > >>to a document that is explicitly marked as being obsolete? > > I thought if people visit that page , that note might help. > > Are we taking out that page from the doc? Why that page is still there? I would happily remove it, but ran into resistance (a few years ago) when I suggested it. Thanks, jon
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.