From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>

Fix a double newline in the GPIO provider header.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
---
 include/linux/gpio/driver.h | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/gpio/driver.h b/include/linux/gpio/driver.h
index c312bf3e0369..8f0859ba7065 100644
--- a/include/linux/gpio/driver.h
+++ b/include/linux/gpio/driver.h
@@ -765,7 +765,6 @@ struct gpio_desc *gpiochip_get_desc(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int hwnum);
 int gpiochip_lock_as_irq(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset);
 void gpiochip_unlock_as_irq(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset);
 
-
 struct gpio_chip *gpiod_to_chip(const struct gpio_desc *desc);
 
 #else /* CONFIG_GPIOLIB */
-- 
2.39.2

On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 01:35:20PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
> 
> Fix a double newline in the GPIO provider header.

Separate patch for this?!
I would just fold it in the extern removal and that's it.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 2:13 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 01:35:20PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
> >
> > Fix a double newline in the GPIO provider header.
>
> Separate patch for this?!
> I would just fold it in the extern removal and that's it.
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
>

It's nowhere near the code I modified in the other one.

Just slap a reviewed-by on it and let's move on, more important
patches are coming up. :)

Bart

On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 02:29:19PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 2:13 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 01:35:20PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
> > >
> > > Fix a double newline in the GPIO provider header.
> >
> > Separate patch for this?!
> > I would just fold it in the extern removal and that's it.
> 
> It's nowhere near the code I modified in the other one.
> 
> Just slap a reviewed-by on it and let's move on, more important
> patches are coming up. :)

You may apply this without my tag, nothing to review here, seriously.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko