[PATCH 4.19 0/2] 4.19.294-rc2 review

Greg Kroah-Hartman posted 2 patches 2 years, 3 months ago
Only 0 patches received!
Makefile                            |  4 ++--
arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/timer-ep93xx.c |  3 +--
arch/mips/alchemy/common/dbdma.c    | 27 ++++++++++++---------------
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
[PATCH 4.19 0/2] 4.19.294-rc2 review
Posted by Greg Kroah-Hartman 2 years, 3 months ago
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.294 release.
There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Sep 2023 17:22:08 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.294-rc2.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.19.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Linux 4.19.294-rc2

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Revert "ARM: ep93xx: fix missing-prototype warnings"

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Revert "MIPS: Alchemy: fix dbdma2"


-------------

Diffstat:

 Makefile                            |  4 ++--
 arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/timer-ep93xx.c |  3 +--
 arch/mips/alchemy/common/dbdma.c    | 27 ++++++++++++---------------
 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
Re: [PATCH 4.19 0/2] 4.19.294-rc2 review
Posted by Guenter Roeck 2 years, 3 months ago
On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 07:30:20PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.294 release.
> There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Sep 2023 17:22:08 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 

Build results:
	total: 149 pass: 149 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
	total: 432 pass: 432 fail: 0

Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Guenter
Re: [PATCH 4.19 0/2] 4.19.294-rc2 review
Posted by Jon Hunter 2 years, 3 months ago
On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 19:30:20 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.294 release.
> There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Sep 2023 17:22:08 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.294-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.19.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

All tests passing for Tegra ...

Test results for stable-v4.19:
    11 builds:	11 pass, 0 fail
    22 boots:	22 pass, 0 fail
    40 tests:	40 pass, 0 fail

Linux version:	4.19.294-rc2-gcb2cdf227208
Boards tested:	tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
                tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra20-ventana,
                tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra30-cardhu-a04

Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>

Jon
Re: [PATCH 4.19 0/2] 4.19.294-rc2 review
Posted by Naresh Kamboju 2 years, 3 months ago
On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 at 23:00, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.294 release.
> There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Sep 2023 17:22:08 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.294-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.19.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

## Build
* kernel: 4.19.294-rc2
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-4.19.y
* git commit: cb2cdf2272086683c41f5bb61390600f01227b6e
* git describe: v4.19.293-3-gcb2cdf227208
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.19.y/build/v4.19.293-3-gcb2cdf227208

## Test Regressions (compared to v4.19.293)

## Metric Regressions (compared to v4.19.293)

## Test Fixes (compared to v4.19.293)

## Metric Fixes (compared to v4.19.293)

## Test result summary
total: 48932, pass: 41532, fail: 1475, skip: 5891, xfail: 34

## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 108 total, 100 passed, 8 failed
* arm64: 37 total, 32 passed, 5 failed
* i386: 21 total, 18 passed, 3 failed
* mips: 22 total, 22 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 3 total, 0 passed, 3 failed
* powerpc: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 11 total, 11 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 31 total, 26 passed, 5 failed

## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* rcutorture

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 4.19 0/2] 4.19.294-rc2 review
Posted by Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink) 2 years, 3 months ago
Hi Greg,

On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 07:30:20PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.294 release.
> There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Sep 2023 17:22:08 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Build test (gcc version 11.4.1 20230829):
mips: 63 configs -> no  failure
arm: 115 configs -> no failure
arm64: 2 configs -> no failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure

Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]

[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/4879


Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>

-- 
Regards
Sudip