[PATCH 5.10 00/11] 5.10.194-rc1 review

Greg Kroah-Hartman posted 11 patches 2 years, 3 months ago
Only 0 patches received!
Makefile                               |  4 ++--
arch/arm/kernel/module-plts.c          |  2 +-
arch/arm64/kernel/module-plts.c        |  3 ++-
arch/mips/alchemy/common/dbdma.c       | 27 ++++++++++++-------------
drivers/bus/mhi/host/pci_generic.c     |  2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c |  6 ++----
include/linux/moduleloader.h           |  5 +++++
kernel/module.c                        |  2 +-
kernel/rcu/tasks.h                     | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h                  |  5 ++++-
10 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
[PATCH 5.10 00/11] 5.10.194-rc1 review
Posted by Greg Kroah-Hartman 2 years, 3 months ago
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.194 release.
There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Sep 2023 11:08:22 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.194-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Linux 5.10.194-rc1

Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
    rcu-tasks: Add trc_inspect_reader() checks for exiting critical section

Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
    rcu-tasks: Wait for trc_read_check_handler() IPIs

Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
    rcu-tasks: Fix IPI failure handling in trc_wait_for_one_reader

Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
    rcu: Prevent expedited GP from enabling tick on offline CPU

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Revert "MIPS: Alchemy: fix dbdma2"

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Revert "drm/amdgpu: install stub fence into potential unused fence pointers"

Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org>
    mhi: pci_generic: Fix implicit conversion warning

James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
    ARM: module: Use module_init_layout_section() to spot init sections

James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
    arm64: module: Use module_init_layout_section() to spot init sections

Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
    arm64: module-plts: inline linux/moduleloader.h

James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
    module: Expose module_init_layout_section()


-------------

Diffstat:

 Makefile                               |  4 ++--
 arch/arm/kernel/module-plts.c          |  2 +-
 arch/arm64/kernel/module-plts.c        |  3 ++-
 arch/mips/alchemy/common/dbdma.c       | 27 ++++++++++++-------------
 drivers/bus/mhi/host/pci_generic.c     |  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c |  6 ++----
 include/linux/moduleloader.h           |  5 +++++
 kernel/module.c                        |  2 +-
 kernel/rcu/tasks.h                     | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h                  |  5 ++++-
 10 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/11] 5.10.194-rc1 review
Posted by Naresh Kamboju 2 years, 3 months ago
On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 at 16:40, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.194 release.
> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Sep 2023 11:08:22 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.194-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h


Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

## Build
* kernel: 5.10.195-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.10.y
* git commit: 95379666b7a68327e8f4c3a0dbf28ae0c479ab4c
* git describe: v5.10.194-407-g95379666b7a6
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.194-407-g95379666b7a6

## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.194)

## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.194)

## Test Fixes (compared to v5.10.194)

## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.194)

## Test result summary
total: 80823, pass: 63120, fail: 2111, skip: 15541, xfail: 51

## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 111 total, 111 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 38 total, 38 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 28 total, 28 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 23 total, 23 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 3 total, 0 passed, 3 failed
* powerpc: 23 total, 23 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 11 total, 11 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 33 total, 33 passed, 0 failed

## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-watchdog
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* perf
* rcutorture

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/11] 5.10.194-rc1 review
Posted by Guenter Roeck 2 years, 3 months ago
On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 01:09:52PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.194 release.
> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Sep 2023 11:08:22 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 

Build results:
	total: 159 pass: 159 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
	total: 487 pass: 487 fail: 0

Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Guenter
Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/11] 5.10.194-rc1 review
Posted by Jon Hunter 2 years, 3 months ago
On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 13:09:52 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.194 release.
> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Sep 2023 11:08:22 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.194-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

All tests passing for Tegra ...

Test results for stable-v5.10:
    11 builds:	11 pass, 0 fail
    28 boots:	28 pass, 0 fail
    75 tests:	75 pass, 0 fail

Linux version:	5.10.194-rc1-ge25611a229ff
Boards tested:	tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
                tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
                tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
                tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04

Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>

Jon
Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/11] 5.10.194-rc1 review
Posted by Shuah Khan 2 years, 3 months ago
On 8/31/23 05:09, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.194 release.
> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Sep 2023 11:08:22 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.194-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.

Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>

thanks,
-- Shuah
Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/11] 5.10.194-rc1 review
Posted by Naresh Kamboju 2 years, 3 months ago
On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 at 16:40, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.194 release.
> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Sep 2023 11:08:22 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.194-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h


Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

## Build
* kernel: 5.10.194-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.10.y
* git commit: e25611a229ff9e907889923c2702d817003bc228
* git describe: v5.10.193-12-ge25611a229ff
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.193-12-ge25611a229ff

## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.193)

## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.193)

## Test Fixes (compared to v5.10.193)

## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.193)

## Test result summary
total: 97983, pass: 79078, fail: 2772, skip: 16068, xfail: 65

## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 112 total, 112 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 43 total, 43 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 35 total, 35 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 27 total, 26 passed, 1 failed
* parisc: 4 total, 0 passed, 4 failed
* powerpc: 25 total, 24 passed, 1 failed
* riscv: 12 total, 11 passed, 1 failed
* s390: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 14 total, 12 passed, 2 failed
* sparc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed

## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-watchdog
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* perf
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/11] 5.10.194-rc1 review
Posted by Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink) 2 years, 3 months ago
Hi Greg,

On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 01:09:52PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.194 release.
> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Sep 2023 11:08:22 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Build test (gcc version 11.4.1 20230829):
mips: 63 configs -> no failure
arm: 104 configs -> no failure
arm64: 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure

Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]

[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/4881
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/4902


Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>

-- 
Regards
Sudip
Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/11] 5.10.194-rc1 review
Posted by Florian Fainelli 2 years, 3 months ago
On 8/31/23 04:09, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.194 release.
> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Sep 2023 11:08:22 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.194-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on 
BMIPS_GENERIC:

Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
-- 
Florian