[PATCH 5.15 0/9] 5.15.130-rc1 review

Greg Kroah-Hartman posted 9 patches 2 years, 3 months ago
Only 0 patches received!
Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt |  4 ---
Makefile                                        |  4 +--
arch/arm/kernel/module-plts.c                   |  2 +-
arch/arm64/kernel/module-plts.c                 |  3 ++-
drivers/acpi/thermal.c                          |  6 +----
include/linux/moduleloader.h                    |  5 ++++
kernel/module.c                                 |  2 +-
kernel/rcu/tasks.h                              | 36 ++++++++++++++++++-------
kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h                           |  5 +++-
9 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
[PATCH 5.15 0/9] 5.15.130-rc1 review
Posted by Greg Kroah-Hartman 2 years, 3 months ago
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.130 release.
There are 9 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Sep 2023 11:08:22 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.130-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Linux 5.15.130-rc1

Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
    rcu-tasks: Add trc_inspect_reader() checks for exiting critical section

Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
    rcu-tasks: Wait for trc_read_check_handler() IPIs

Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
    rcu-tasks: Fix IPI failure handling in trc_wait_for_one_reader

Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
    rcu: Prevent expedited GP from enabling tick on offline CPU

James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
    ARM: module: Use module_init_layout_section() to spot init sections

James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
    arm64: module: Use module_init_layout_section() to spot init sections

Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
    arm64: module-plts: inline linux/moduleloader.h

James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
    module: Expose module_init_layout_section()

Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
    ACPI: thermal: Drop nocrt parameter


-------------

Diffstat:

 Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt |  4 ---
 Makefile                                        |  4 +--
 arch/arm/kernel/module-plts.c                   |  2 +-
 arch/arm64/kernel/module-plts.c                 |  3 ++-
 drivers/acpi/thermal.c                          |  6 +----
 include/linux/moduleloader.h                    |  5 ++++
 kernel/module.c                                 |  2 +-
 kernel/rcu/tasks.h                              | 36 ++++++++++++++++++-------
 kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h                           |  5 +++-
 9 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
Re: [PATCH 5.15 0/9] 5.15.130-rc1 review
Posted by Guenter Roeck 2 years, 3 months ago
On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 01:10:08PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.130 release.
> There are 9 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Sep 2023 11:08:22 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 

Build results:
	total: 155 pass: 155 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
	total: 501 pass: 501 fail: 0

Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Guenter
Re: [PATCH 5.15 0/9] 5.15.130-rc1 review
Posted by Jon Hunter 2 years, 3 months ago
On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 13:10:08 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.130 release.
> There are 9 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Sep 2023 11:08:22 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.130-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

All tests passing for Tegra ...

Test results for stable-v5.15:
    11 builds:	11 pass, 0 fail
    28 boots:	28 pass, 0 fail
    114 tests:	114 pass, 0 fail

Linux version:	5.15.130-rc1-g46b26da4b872
Boards tested:	tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
                tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
                tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
                tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04

Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>

Jon
Re: [PATCH 5.15 0/9] 5.15.130-rc1 review
Posted by Shuah Khan 2 years, 3 months ago
On 8/31/23 05:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.130 release.
> There are 9 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Sep 2023 11:08:22 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.130-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.

Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>

thanks,
-- Shuah
Re: [PATCH 5.15 0/9] 5.15.130-rc1 review
Posted by Naresh Kamboju 2 years, 3 months ago
On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 at 16:41, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.130 release.
> There are 9 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Sep 2023 11:08:22 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.130-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

## Build
* kernel: 5.15.130-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.15.y
* git commit: 46b26da4b8729ab6a0bd90326cf182a2535d938e
* git describe: v5.15.129-10-g46b26da4b872
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.15.y/build/v5.15.129-10-g46b26da4b872

## Test Regressions (compared to v5.15.129)

## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.15.129)

## Test Fixes (compared to v5.15.129)

## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.15.129)

## Test result summary
total: 98073, pass: 79708, fail: 2412, skip: 15861, xfail: 92

## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 114 total, 113 passed, 1 failed
* arm64: 43 total, 42 passed, 1 failed
* i386: 34 total, 33 passed, 1 failed
* mips: 27 total, 26 passed, 1 failed
* parisc: 4 total, 4 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 26 total, 25 passed, 1 failed
* riscv: 11 total, 10 passed, 1 failed
* s390: 12 total, 11 passed, 1 failed
* sh: 14 total, 12 passed, 2 failed
* sparc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 37 total, 36 passed, 1 failed

## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-watchdog
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* perf
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 5.15 0/9] 5.15.130-rc1 review
Posted by Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink) 2 years, 3 months ago
Hi Greg,

On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 01:10:08PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.130 release.
> There are 9 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Sep 2023 11:08:22 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Build test (gcc version 12.3.1 20230829):
mips: 62 configs -> no failure
arm: 99 configs -> no failure
arm64: 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
csky allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure

Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3]

[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/4885
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/4887
[3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/4886

Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>

-- 
Regards
Sudip
Re: [PATCH 5.15 0/9] 5.15.130-rc1 review
Posted by Ron Economos 2 years, 3 months ago
On 8/31/23 4:10 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.130 release.
> There are 9 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Sep 2023 11:08:22 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.130-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).

Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
Re: [PATCH 5.15 0/9] 5.15.130-rc1 review
Posted by SeongJae Park 2 years, 3 months ago
Hello,

On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 13:10:08 +0200 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.130 release.
> There are 9 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Sep 2023 11:08:22 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.130-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.

This rc kernel passes DAMON functionality test[1] on my test machine.
Attaching the test results summary below.  Please note that I retrieved the
kernel from linux-stable-rc tree[2].

Tested-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>

[1] https://github.com/awslabs/damon-tests/tree/next/corr
[2] 46b26da4b872 ("Linux 5.15.130-rc1")

Thanks,
SJ

[...]

---

ok 13 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_idle_flag.sh
# selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_highpte.sh
# .config:1341:warning: override: reassigning to symbol DAMON
ok 14 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_highpte.sh
# selftests: damon-tests: build_nomemcg.sh
# .config:1342:warning: override: reassigning to symbol DAMON
# .config:1352:warning: override: reassigning to symbol CGROUPS
ok 15 selftests: damon-tests: build_nomemcg.sh
# kselftest dir '/home/sjpark/damon-tests-cont/linux/tools/testing/selftests/damon-tests' is in dirty state.
# the log is at '/home/sjpark/log'.
 [32m
ok 1 selftests: damon: debugfs_attrs.sh
ok 1 selftests: damon-tests: kunit.sh
ok 2 selftests: damon-tests: huge_count_read_write.sh
ok 3 selftests: damon-tests: buffer_overflow.sh
ok 4 selftests: damon-tests: rm_contexts.sh
ok 5 selftests: damon-tests: record_null_deref.sh
ok 6 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_read_before_terminate_race.sh
ok 7 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_pid_leak.sh
ok 8 selftests: damon-tests: damo_tests.sh
ok 9 selftests: damon-tests: masim-record.sh
ok 10 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386.sh
ok 11 selftests: damon-tests: build_m68k.sh
ok 12 selftests: damon-tests: build_arm64.sh
ok 13 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_idle_flag.sh
ok 14 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_highpte.sh
ok 15 selftests: damon-tests: build_nomemcg.sh
 [33m
 [92mPASS [39m
_remote_run_corr.sh SUCCESS
Re: [PATCH 5.15 0/9] 5.15.130-rc1 review
Posted by Florian Fainelli 2 years, 3 months ago
On 8/31/23 04:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.130 release.
> There are 9 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Sep 2023 11:08:22 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.130-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on 
BMIPS_GENERIC:

Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
-- 
Florian