[PATCH v1] perf metric: Add #num_cpus_online literal

Ian Rogers posted 1 patch 2 years, 3 months ago
tools/perf/tests/expr.c | 5 ++++-
tools/perf/util/expr.c  | 7 +++++++
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
[PATCH v1] perf metric: Add #num_cpus_online literal
Posted by Ian Rogers 2 years, 3 months ago
Returns the number of CPUs online, unlike #num_cpus that returns the
number present. Add a test of the property. This will be used in
future Intel metrics.

Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
---
 tools/perf/tests/expr.c | 5 ++++-
 tools/perf/util/expr.c  | 7 +++++++
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/expr.c b/tools/perf/tests/expr.c
index c1c3fcbc2753..81229fa4f1e9 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/expr.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/expr.c
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ static int test__expr(struct test_suite *t __maybe_unused, int subtest __maybe_u
 {
 	struct expr_id_data *val_ptr;
 	const char *p;
-	double val, num_cpus, num_cores, num_dies, num_packages;
+	double val, num_cpus_online, num_cpus, num_cores, num_dies, num_packages;
 	int ret;
 	struct expr_parse_ctx *ctx;
 	bool is_intel = false;
@@ -227,7 +227,10 @@ static int test__expr(struct test_suite *t __maybe_unused, int subtest __maybe_u
 
 	/* Test toplogy constants appear well ordered. */
 	expr__ctx_clear(ctx);
+	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#num_cpus_online",
+			expr__parse(&num_cpus_online, ctx, "#num_cpus_online") == 0);
 	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#num_cpus", expr__parse(&num_cpus, ctx, "#num_cpus") == 0);
+	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#num_cpus >= #num_cpus_online", num_cpus >= num_cpus_online);
 	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#num_cores", expr__parse(&num_cores, ctx, "#num_cores") == 0);
 	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#num_cpus >= #num_cores", num_cpus >= num_cores);
 	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#num_dies", expr__parse(&num_dies, ctx, "#num_dies") == 0);
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/expr.c b/tools/perf/util/expr.c
index 0985a3cbc6f9..4488f306de78 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/expr.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/expr.c
@@ -427,6 +427,13 @@ double expr__get_literal(const char *literal, const struct expr_scanner_ctx *ctx
 		result = cpu__max_present_cpu().cpu;
 		goto out;
 	}
+	if (!strcmp("#num_cpus_online", literal)) {
+		struct perf_cpu_map *online = cpu_map__online();
+
+		if (online)
+			result = perf_cpu_map__nr(online);
+		goto out;
+	}
 
 	if (!strcasecmp("#system_tsc_freq", literal)) {
 		result = arch_get_tsc_freq();
-- 
2.42.0.rc2.253.gd59a3bf2b4-goog
Re: [PATCH v1] perf metric: Add #num_cpus_online literal
Posted by Liang, Kan 2 years, 3 months ago

On 2023-08-30 3:30 a.m., Ian Rogers wrote:
> Returns the number of CPUs online, unlike #num_cpus that returns the
> number present. Add a test of the property. This will be used in
> future Intel metrics.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>

Reviewed-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>

Thanks,
Kan
> ---
>  tools/perf/tests/expr.c | 5 ++++-
>  tools/perf/util/expr.c  | 7 +++++++
>  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/expr.c b/tools/perf/tests/expr.c
> index c1c3fcbc2753..81229fa4f1e9 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/expr.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/expr.c
> @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ static int test__expr(struct test_suite *t __maybe_unused, int subtest __maybe_u
>  {
>  	struct expr_id_data *val_ptr;
>  	const char *p;
> -	double val, num_cpus, num_cores, num_dies, num_packages;
> +	double val, num_cpus_online, num_cpus, num_cores, num_dies, num_packages;
>  	int ret;
>  	struct expr_parse_ctx *ctx;
>  	bool is_intel = false;
> @@ -227,7 +227,10 @@ static int test__expr(struct test_suite *t __maybe_unused, int subtest __maybe_u
>  
>  	/* Test toplogy constants appear well ordered. */
>  	expr__ctx_clear(ctx);
> +	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#num_cpus_online",
> +			expr__parse(&num_cpus_online, ctx, "#num_cpus_online") == 0);
>  	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#num_cpus", expr__parse(&num_cpus, ctx, "#num_cpus") == 0);
> +	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#num_cpus >= #num_cpus_online", num_cpus >= num_cpus_online);
>  	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#num_cores", expr__parse(&num_cores, ctx, "#num_cores") == 0);
>  	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#num_cpus >= #num_cores", num_cpus >= num_cores);
>  	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#num_dies", expr__parse(&num_dies, ctx, "#num_dies") == 0);
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/expr.c b/tools/perf/util/expr.c
> index 0985a3cbc6f9..4488f306de78 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/expr.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/expr.c
> @@ -427,6 +427,13 @@ double expr__get_literal(const char *literal, const struct expr_scanner_ctx *ctx
>  		result = cpu__max_present_cpu().cpu;
>  		goto out;
>  	}
> +	if (!strcmp("#num_cpus_online", literal)) {
> +		struct perf_cpu_map *online = cpu_map__online();
> +
> +		if (online)
> +			result = perf_cpu_map__nr(online);
> +		goto out;
> +	}
>  
>  	if (!strcasecmp("#system_tsc_freq", literal)) {
>  		result = arch_get_tsc_freq();
Re: [PATCH v1] perf metric: Add #num_cpus_online literal
Posted by Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2 years, 3 months ago
Em Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 09:14:00AM -0400, Liang, Kan escreveu:
> 
> 
> On 2023-08-30 3:30 a.m., Ian Rogers wrote:
> > Returns the number of CPUs online, unlike #num_cpus that returns the
> > number present. Add a test of the property. This will be used in
> > future Intel metrics.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>

Thanks, applied.

- Arnaldo

 
> Thanks,
> Kan
> > ---
> >  tools/perf/tests/expr.c | 5 ++++-
> >  tools/perf/util/expr.c  | 7 +++++++
> >  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/expr.c b/tools/perf/tests/expr.c
> > index c1c3fcbc2753..81229fa4f1e9 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/tests/expr.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/tests/expr.c
> > @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ static int test__expr(struct test_suite *t __maybe_unused, int subtest __maybe_u
> >  {
> >  	struct expr_id_data *val_ptr;
> >  	const char *p;
> > -	double val, num_cpus, num_cores, num_dies, num_packages;
> > +	double val, num_cpus_online, num_cpus, num_cores, num_dies, num_packages;
> >  	int ret;
> >  	struct expr_parse_ctx *ctx;
> >  	bool is_intel = false;
> > @@ -227,7 +227,10 @@ static int test__expr(struct test_suite *t __maybe_unused, int subtest __maybe_u
> >  
> >  	/* Test toplogy constants appear well ordered. */
> >  	expr__ctx_clear(ctx);
> > +	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#num_cpus_online",
> > +			expr__parse(&num_cpus_online, ctx, "#num_cpus_online") == 0);
> >  	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#num_cpus", expr__parse(&num_cpus, ctx, "#num_cpus") == 0);
> > +	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#num_cpus >= #num_cpus_online", num_cpus >= num_cpus_online);
> >  	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#num_cores", expr__parse(&num_cores, ctx, "#num_cores") == 0);
> >  	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#num_cpus >= #num_cores", num_cpus >= num_cores);
> >  	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#num_dies", expr__parse(&num_dies, ctx, "#num_dies") == 0);
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/expr.c b/tools/perf/util/expr.c
> > index 0985a3cbc6f9..4488f306de78 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/expr.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/expr.c
> > @@ -427,6 +427,13 @@ double expr__get_literal(const char *literal, const struct expr_scanner_ctx *ctx
> >  		result = cpu__max_present_cpu().cpu;
> >  		goto out;
> >  	}
> > +	if (!strcmp("#num_cpus_online", literal)) {
> > +		struct perf_cpu_map *online = cpu_map__online();
> > +
> > +		if (online)
> > +			result = perf_cpu_map__nr(online);
> > +		goto out;
> > +	}
> >  
> >  	if (!strcasecmp("#system_tsc_freq", literal)) {
> >  		result = arch_get_tsc_freq();

-- 

- Arnaldo