[PATCH RFC] init: fix -Wmissing-variable-declarations warning

Justin Stitt posted 1 patch 2 years, 5 months ago
init/main.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
[PATCH RFC] init: fix -Wmissing-variable-declarations warning
Posted by Justin Stitt 2 years, 5 months ago
Hi all,

I was looking to get some help on solving this -Wmissing-variable-declarations
warning as there is some hope to turn it on for W=1 soon [1].

When building x86/defconfig with Clang-18 I encounter the following warning:
| init/main.c:189:13: warning: no previous extern declaration for non-static variable 'envp_init' [-Wmissing-variable-declarations]
|   189 | const char *envp_init[MAX_INIT_ENVS+2] = { "HOME=/", "TERM=linux", NULL, };
|       |             ^
| init/main.c:189:7: note: declare 'static' if the variable is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit
|   189 | const char *envp_init[MAX_INIT_ENVS+2] = { "HOME=/", "TERM=linux", NULL, };
|       |       ^

It seems like the obvious solution is to just add the `static` keyword
and be done with it. I suspect, however, that it is not so simple for
the following reasons:

Firstly, `envp_init` is surrounded by two other variables that have been
explicitly marked as `static` which leads me to believe that this one
was intentionally _not_ marked as static for some reason:
| static const char *argv_init[MAX_INIT_ARGS+2] = { "init", NULL, };
| static const char *envp_init[MAX_INIT_ENVS+2] = { "HOME=/", "TERM=linux", NULL, };
| static const char *panic_later, *panic_param;

Secondly, there exists this `extern` declaration for `envp_init`:
| init/do_mounts_initrd.c
| 90:     extern char *envp_init[];

This one is tricky because it seems like I can rename (effectively
remove) this extern symbol entirely and still build a kernel image.

If it truly is the case that this extern declaration works then why does
Clang produce the warning at all?

FWIW, I've tried moving `extern char *envp_init[];` to top-level scope
inside of `do_mounts_initrd.c` which did _not_ work in fixing the
warning.

So all in all, it looks like just adding `static` fixes the warning
(which it does) but I am not sure about the other ramifications of this
patch especially considering the second point I brought up above
regarding the extern declaration already existing (but seemingly not
doing anything).

Any help here would be appreciated!

Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1920 [1]
Signed-off-by: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>
---
 init/main.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c
index ad920fac325c..9a473107bb8f 100644
--- a/init/main.c
+++ b/init/main.c
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ static int __init set_reset_devices(char *str)
 __setup("reset_devices", set_reset_devices);
 
 static const char *argv_init[MAX_INIT_ARGS+2] = { "init", NULL, };
-const char *envp_init[MAX_INIT_ENVS+2] = { "HOME=/", "TERM=linux", NULL, };
+static const char *envp_init[MAX_INIT_ENVS+2] = { "HOME=/", "TERM=linux", NULL, };
 static const char *panic_later, *panic_param;
 
 static bool __init obsolete_checksetup(char *line)

---
base-commit: 706a741595047797872e669b3101429ab8d378ef
change-id: 20230829-missingvardecl-init-main-c-1af2e128419e

Best regards,
--
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>
Re: [PATCH RFC] init: fix -Wmissing-variable-declarations warning
Posted by Kees Cook 2 years, 5 months ago
On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 11:38:31PM +0000, Justin Stitt wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I was looking to get some help on solving this -Wmissing-variable-declarations
> warning as there is some hope to turn it on for W=1 soon [1].
> 
> When building x86/defconfig with Clang-18 I encounter the following warning:
> | init/main.c:189:13: warning: no previous extern declaration for non-static variable 'envp_init' [-Wmissing-variable-declarations]
> |   189 | const char *envp_init[MAX_INIT_ENVS+2] = { "HOME=/", "TERM=linux", NULL, };
> |       |             ^
> | init/main.c:189:7: note: declare 'static' if the variable is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit
> |   189 | const char *envp_init[MAX_INIT_ENVS+2] = { "HOME=/", "TERM=linux", NULL, };
> |       |       ^
> 
> It seems like the obvious solution is to just add the `static` keyword
> and be done with it. I suspect, however, that it is not so simple for
> the following reasons:
> 
> Firstly, `envp_init` is surrounded by two other variables that have been
> explicitly marked as `static` which leads me to believe that this one
> was intentionally _not_ marked as static for some reason:
> | static const char *argv_init[MAX_INIT_ARGS+2] = { "init", NULL, };
> | static const char *envp_init[MAX_INIT_ENVS+2] = { "HOME=/", "TERM=linux", NULL, };
> | static const char *panic_later, *panic_param;

I went looking to see the history here and it goes beyond git history.  :)

> 
> Secondly, there exists this `extern` declaration for `envp_init`:
> | init/do_mounts_initrd.c
> | 90:     extern char *envp_init[];

This is the only user of call_usermodehelper_setup() that doesn't make
its own envp. And there's a deprecation warning in that function too:

9acc17baf1fd6   (Christoph Hellwig      2020-07-08 18:18:54 +0200 93)     pr_warn("using deprecated initrd support, will be removed in 2021.\n");

> Any help here would be appreciated!

I recommend making it static and giving handle_initrd() its own copy:

diff --git a/init/do_mounts_initrd.c b/init/do_mounts_initrd.c
index 425f4bcf4b77..154bd0de85a6 100644
--- a/init/do_mounts_initrd.c
+++ b/init/do_mounts_initrd.c
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ static void __init handle_initrd(char *root_device_name)
 {
 	struct subprocess_info *info;
 	static char *argv[] = { "linuxrc", NULL, };
-	extern char *envp_init[];
+	static char *envp[] = { "HOME=/", "TERM=linux", NULL, };
 	int error;
 
 	pr_warn("using deprecated initrd support, will be removed in 2021.\n");
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ static void __init handle_initrd(char *root_device_name)
 	init_mkdir("/old", 0700);
 	init_chdir("/old");
 
-	info = call_usermodehelper_setup("/linuxrc", argv, envp_init,
+	info = call_usermodehelper_setup("/linuxrc", argv, envp,
 					 GFP_KERNEL, init_linuxrc, NULL, NULL);
 	if (!info)
 		return;

-- 
Kees Cook