linux-next: manual merge of the dmaengine tree with Linus' tree

Stephen Rothwell posted 1 patch 2 years, 3 months ago
linux-next: manual merge of the dmaengine tree with Linus' tree
Posted by Stephen Rothwell 2 years, 3 months ago
Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the dmaengine tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/dma/mcf-edma.c

between commit:

  0a46781c89de ("dmaengine: mcf-edma: Fix a potential un-allocated memory access")

from Linus' tree and commit:

  923b13838892 ("dmaengine: mcf-edma: Use struct_size()")

from the dmaengine tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc drivers/dma/mcf-edma.c
index 9413fad08a60,28304dd8763a..000000000000
--- a/drivers/dma/mcf-edma.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/mcf-edma.c
@@@ -190,15 -189,9 +189,15 @@@ static int mcf_edma_probe(struct platfo
  		return -EINVAL;
  	}
  
 -	chans = pdata->dma_channels;
 +	if (!pdata->dma_channels) {
 +		dev_info(&pdev->dev, "setting default channel number to 64");
 +		chans = 64;
 +	} else {
 +		chans = pdata->dma_channels;
 +	}
 +
- 	len = sizeof(*mcf_edma) + sizeof(*mcf_chan) * chans;
- 	mcf_edma = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, len, GFP_KERNEL);
+ 	mcf_edma = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, struct_size(mcf_edma, chans, chans),
+ 				GFP_KERNEL);
  	if (!mcf_edma)
  		return -ENOMEM;
  
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the dmaengine tree with Linus' tree
Posted by Vinod Koul 2 years, 3 months ago
On 22-08-23, 15:13, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the dmaengine tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/dma/mcf-edma.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   0a46781c89de ("dmaengine: mcf-edma: Fix a potential un-allocated memory access")
> 
> from Linus' tree and commit:
> 
>   923b13838892 ("dmaengine: mcf-edma: Use struct_size()")
> 
> from the dmaengine tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

Thanks for the merge, it lgtm


> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> 
> diff --cc drivers/dma/mcf-edma.c
> index 9413fad08a60,28304dd8763a..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/dma/mcf-edma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/mcf-edma.c
> @@@ -190,15 -189,9 +189,15 @@@ static int mcf_edma_probe(struct platfo
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   	}
>   
>  -	chans = pdata->dma_channels;
>  +	if (!pdata->dma_channels) {
>  +		dev_info(&pdev->dev, "setting default channel number to 64");
>  +		chans = 64;
>  +	} else {
>  +		chans = pdata->dma_channels;
>  +	}
>  +
> - 	len = sizeof(*mcf_edma) + sizeof(*mcf_chan) * chans;
> - 	mcf_edma = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, len, GFP_KERNEL);
> + 	mcf_edma = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, struct_size(mcf_edma, chans, chans),
> + 				GFP_KERNEL);
>   	if (!mcf_edma)
>   		return -ENOMEM;
>   



-- 
~Vinod