1. Patchew
  2. linux
  3. [PATCH -next v3 0/7] md: make rdev addition and removal independent from daemon thread
  4. View patch

[PATCH -next v3 5/7] md: factor out a helper rdev_is_spare() from remove_and_add_spares()

Yu Kuai posted 7 patches 2 years, 3 months ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH -next v3 5/7] md: factor out a helper rdev_is_spare() from remove_and_add_spares()
Posted by Yu Kuai 2 years, 3 months ago 
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>

There are no functional changes, just to make the code simpler and
prepare to delay remove_and_add_spares() to md_start_sync().

Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/md/md.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
index ceace5ffadd6..11d27c934fdd 100644
--- a/drivers/md/md.c
+++ b/drivers/md/md.c
@@ -9169,6 +9169,14 @@ static bool rdev_removeable(struct md_rdev *rdev)
 	return true;
 }
 
+static bool rdev_is_spare(struct md_rdev *rdev)
+{
+	return !test_bit(Candidate, &rdev->flags) && rdev->raid_disk >= 0 &&
+	       !test_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags) &&
+	       !test_bit(Journal, &rdev->flags) &&
+	       !test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags);
+}
+
 static int remove_and_add_spares(struct mddev *mddev,
 				 struct md_rdev *this)
 {
@@ -9217,13 +9225,10 @@ static int remove_and_add_spares(struct mddev *mddev,
 	rdev_for_each(rdev, mddev) {
 		if (this && this != rdev)
 			continue;
+		if (rdev_is_spare(rdev))
+			spares++;
 		if (test_bit(Candidate, &rdev->flags))
 			continue;
-		if (rdev->raid_disk >= 0 &&
-		    !test_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags) &&
-		    !test_bit(Journal, &rdev->flags) &&
-		    !test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags))
-			spares++;
 		if (rdev->raid_disk >= 0)
 			continue;
 		if (test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags))
-- 
2.39.2
Re: [PATCH -next v3 5/7] md: factor out a helper rdev_is_spare() from remove_and_add_spares()
Posted by Xiao Ni 2 years, 3 months ago 
On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 5:13 PM Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> wrote:
>
> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
>
> There are no functional changes, just to make the code simpler and
> prepare to delay remove_and_add_spares() to md_start_sync().
>
> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/md/md.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
> index ceace5ffadd6..11d27c934fdd 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/md.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/md.c
> @@ -9169,6 +9169,14 @@ static bool rdev_removeable(struct md_rdev *rdev)
>         return true;
>  }
>
> +static bool rdev_is_spare(struct md_rdev *rdev)
> +{
> +       return !test_bit(Candidate, &rdev->flags) && rdev->raid_disk >= 0 &&
> +              !test_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags) &&
> +              !test_bit(Journal, &rdev->flags) &&
> +              !test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags);
> +}
> +
>  static int remove_and_add_spares(struct mddev *mddev,
>                                  struct md_rdev *this)
>  {
> @@ -9217,13 +9225,10 @@ static int remove_and_add_spares(struct mddev *mddev,
>         rdev_for_each(rdev, mddev) {
>                 if (this && this != rdev)
>                         continue;
> +               if (rdev_is_spare(rdev))
> +                       spares++;
>                 if (test_bit(Candidate, &rdev->flags))
>                         continue;

Hi Kuai

Why not put rdev_is_spare after testing Candidate?

Best Regards
Xiao

> -               if (rdev->raid_disk >= 0 &&
> -                   !test_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags) &&
> -                   !test_bit(Journal, &rdev->flags) &&
> -                   !test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags))
> -                       spares++;
>                 if (rdev->raid_disk >= 0)
>                         continue;
>                 if (test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags))
> --
> 2.39.2
>
Re: [PATCH -next v3 5/7] md: factor out a helper rdev_is_spare() from remove_and_add_spares()
Posted by Xiao Ni 2 years, 3 months ago 
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 10:20 AM Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 5:13 PM Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
> >
> > There are no functional changes, just to make the code simpler and
> > prepare to delay remove_and_add_spares() to md_start_sync().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/md/md.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
> > index ceace5ffadd6..11d27c934fdd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/md/md.c
> > +++ b/drivers/md/md.c
> > @@ -9169,6 +9169,14 @@ static bool rdev_removeable(struct md_rdev *rdev)
> >         return true;
> >  }
> >
> > +static bool rdev_is_spare(struct md_rdev *rdev)
> > +{
> > +       return !test_bit(Candidate, &rdev->flags) && rdev->raid_disk >= 0 &&
> > +              !test_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags) &&
> > +              !test_bit(Journal, &rdev->flags) &&
> > +              !test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags);
> > +}
> > +
> >  static int remove_and_add_spares(struct mddev *mddev,
> >                                  struct md_rdev *this)
> >  {
> > @@ -9217,13 +9225,10 @@ static int remove_and_add_spares(struct mddev *mddev,
> >         rdev_for_each(rdev, mddev) {
> >                 if (this && this != rdev)
> >                         continue;
> > +               if (rdev_is_spare(rdev))
> > +                       spares++;
> >                 if (test_bit(Candidate, &rdev->flags))
> >                         continue;
>
> Hi Kuai
>
> Why not put rdev_is_spare after testing Candidate?
>
> Best Regards
> Xiao

I know the answer now, Because the next patch wants to put codes into
the function rdev_addable
>
> > -               if (rdev->raid_disk >= 0 &&
> > -                   !test_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags) &&
> > -                   !test_bit(Journal, &rdev->flags) &&
> > -                   !test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags))
> > -                       spares++;
> >                 if (rdev->raid_disk >= 0)
> >                         continue;
> >                 if (test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags))
> > --
> > 2.39.2
> >

Reviewed-by: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>
Re: [PATCH -next v3 5/7] md: factor out a helper rdev_is_spare() from remove_and_add_spares()
Posted by Yu Kuai 2 years, 3 months ago 
Hi,

在 2023/08/23 10:28, Xiao Ni 写道:
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 10:20 AM Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 5:13 PM Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
>>>
>>> There are no functional changes, just to make the code simpler and
>>> prepare to delay remove_and_add_spares() to md_start_sync().
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/md/md.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
>>>   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
>>> index ceace5ffadd6..11d27c934fdd 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/md/md.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/md/md.c
>>> @@ -9169,6 +9169,14 @@ static bool rdev_removeable(struct md_rdev *rdev)
>>>          return true;
>>>   }
>>>
>>> +static bool rdev_is_spare(struct md_rdev *rdev)
>>> +{
>>> +       return !test_bit(Candidate, &rdev->flags) && rdev->raid_disk >= 0 &&
>>> +              !test_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags) &&
>>> +              !test_bit(Journal, &rdev->flags) &&
>>> +              !test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>   static int remove_and_add_spares(struct mddev *mddev,
>>>                                   struct md_rdev *this)
>>>   {
>>> @@ -9217,13 +9225,10 @@ static int remove_and_add_spares(struct mddev *mddev,
>>>          rdev_for_each(rdev, mddev) {
>>>                  if (this && this != rdev)
>>>                          continue;
>>> +               if (rdev_is_spare(rdev))
>>> +                       spares++;
>>>                  if (test_bit(Candidate, &rdev->flags))
>>>                          continue;
>>
>> Hi Kuai
>>
>> Why not put rdev_is_spare after testing Candidate?
>>
>> Best Regards
>> Xiao
> 
> I know the answer now, Because the next patch wants to put codes into
> the function rdev_addable

Yes, and thanks for the review!

Kuai
>>
>>> -               if (rdev->raid_disk >= 0 &&
>>> -                   !test_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags) &&
>>> -                   !test_bit(Journal, &rdev->flags) &&
>>> -                   !test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags))
>>> -                       spares++;
>>>                  if (rdev->raid_disk >= 0)
>>>                          continue;
>>>                  if (test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags))
>>> --
>>> 2.39.2
>>>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>
> 
> .
>

Patchew 2.1-devel-b67e4c2

© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.