On 8/21/2023 1:31 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 9:40 PM Mario Limonciello
> <mario.limonciello@amd.com> wrote:
>> LPS0 constraints can be useful to other parts of the kernel to make
>> decisions what state to put devices into.
>>
>> In v14 this series has been split into 3 parts.
>> part A: Immediate fix for AMD issue.
>> part B: LPS0 export improvements
>> part C: Long term solution for all vendors
>>
>> This is part B, it can be applied and reviewed independently from part A.
>>
>> Andy Shevchenko (1):
>> ACPI: x86: s2idle: Add for_each_lpi_constraint() helper
>>
>> Mario Limonciello (6):
>> ACPI: Adjust #ifdef for *_lps0_dev use
>> ACPI: x86: s2idle: Post-increment variables when getting constraints
>> ACPI: x86: s2idle: Catch multiple ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE objects
>> ACPI: x86: s2idle: Fix a logic error parsing AMD constraints table
>> ACPI: x86: s2idle: Add more debugging for AMD constraints parsing
>> ACPI: x86: s2idle: Add a function to get constraints for a device
>>
>> drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c | 96 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>> include/linux/acpi.h | 10 +++-
>> 2 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
> All applied as 6.6 material, but I rewrote the last patch my way, so
> please see the result in the bleeding-edge branch and let me know if
> there's anything wrong with it.
>
> Thanks!
Looks great, thanks!