On 15.08.23 17:14, Steffen Eiden wrote:
> From: Viktor Mihajlovski <mihajlov@linux.ibm.com>
>
> Destroy configuration fast may return with RC 0x104 if there
> are still bound APQNs in the configuration. The final cleanup
> will occur with the standard destroy configuration UVC as
> at this point in time all APQNs have been reset and thus
> unbound. Therefore, don't warn if RC 0x104 is reported.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viktor Mihajlovski <mihajlov@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/s390/kvm/pv.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c b/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c
> index 8d3f39a8a11e..8570ee324607 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c
> @@ -285,7 +285,8 @@ static int kvm_s390_pv_deinit_vm_fast(struct kvm *kvm, u16 *rc, u16 *rrc)
> WRITE_ONCE(kvm->arch.gmap->guest_handle, 0);
> KVM_UV_EVENT(kvm, 3, "PROTVIRT DESTROY VM FAST: rc %x rrc %x",
> uvcb.header.rc, uvcb.header.rrc);
> - WARN_ONCE(cc, "protvirt destroy vm fast failed handle %llx rc %x rrc %x",
> + WARN_ONCE(cc && uvcb.header.rc != 0x104,
> + "protvirt destroy vm fast failed handle %llx rc %x rrc %x",
> kvm_s390_pv_get_handle(kvm), uvcb.header.rc, uvcb.header.rrc);
> /* Intended memory leak on "impossible" error */
> if (!cc)