Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the csky tree got a conflict in:
arch/csky/abiv2/cacheflush.c
between commit:
1222e1310d64 ("csky: implement the new page table range API")
from the mm tree and commit:
1362d15ffb59 ("csky: pgtable: Invalidate stale I-cache lines in update_mmu_cache")
from the csky tree.
I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc arch/csky/abiv2/cacheflush.c
index d05a551af5d5,500eb8f69397..000000000000
--- a/arch/csky/abiv2/cacheflush.c
+++ b/arch/csky/abiv2/cacheflush.c
@@@ -16,23 -15,22 +16,22 @@@ void update_mmu_cache_range(struct vm_f
flush_tlb_page(vma, address);
- if (!pfn_valid(pte_pfn(*pte)))
+ if (!pfn_valid(pfn))
return;
- page = pfn_to_page(pte_pfn(*pte));
- if (page == ZERO_PAGE(0))
+ folio = page_folio(pfn_to_page(pfn));
+
+ if (test_and_set_bit(PG_dcache_clean, &folio->flags))
return;
- if (test_and_set_bit(PG_dcache_clean, &page->flags))
- return;
+ for (i = 0; i < folio_nr_pages(folio); i++) {
+ unsigned long addr = (unsigned long) kmap_local_folio(folio,
+ i * PAGE_SIZE);
- addr = (unsigned long) kmap_atomic(page);
-
- icache_inv_range(address, address + PAGE_SIZE);
- dcache_wb_range(addr, addr + PAGE_SIZE);
-
- kunmap_atomic((void *) addr);
++ icache_inv_range(address, address + PAGE_SIZE);
+ dcache_wb_range(addr, addr + PAGE_SIZE);
- if (vma->vm_flags & VM_EXEC)
- icache_inv_range(addr, addr + PAGE_SIZE);
+ kunmap_local((void *) addr);
+ }
}
void flush_icache_deferred(struct mm_struct *mm)
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 8:46 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the csky tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/csky/abiv2/cacheflush.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 1222e1310d64 ("csky: implement the new page table range API")
Could I take this patch into csky next tree to solve the conflict.
>
> from the mm tree and commit:
>
> 1362d15ffb59 ("csky: pgtable: Invalidate stale I-cache lines in update_mmu_cache")
>
> from the csky tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc arch/csky/abiv2/cacheflush.c
> index d05a551af5d5,500eb8f69397..000000000000
> --- a/arch/csky/abiv2/cacheflush.c
> +++ b/arch/csky/abiv2/cacheflush.c
> @@@ -16,23 -15,22 +16,22 @@@ void update_mmu_cache_range(struct vm_f
>
> flush_tlb_page(vma, address);
>
> - if (!pfn_valid(pte_pfn(*pte)))
> + if (!pfn_valid(pfn))
> return;
>
> - page = pfn_to_page(pte_pfn(*pte));
> - if (page == ZERO_PAGE(0))
> + folio = page_folio(pfn_to_page(pfn));
> +
> + if (test_and_set_bit(PG_dcache_clean, &folio->flags))
> return;
>
> - if (test_and_set_bit(PG_dcache_clean, &page->flags))
> - return;
> + for (i = 0; i < folio_nr_pages(folio); i++) {
> + unsigned long addr = (unsigned long) kmap_local_folio(folio,
> + i * PAGE_SIZE);
>
> - addr = (unsigned long) kmap_atomic(page);
> -
> - icache_inv_range(address, address + PAGE_SIZE);
> - dcache_wb_range(addr, addr + PAGE_SIZE);
> -
> - kunmap_atomic((void *) addr);
> ++ icache_inv_range(address, address + PAGE_SIZE);
> + dcache_wb_range(addr, addr + PAGE_SIZE);
> - if (vma->vm_flags & VM_EXEC)
> - icache_inv_range(addr, addr + PAGE_SIZE);
> + kunmap_local((void *) addr);
> + }
> }
>
> void flush_icache_deferred(struct mm_struct *mm)
--
Best Regards
Guo Ren
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:11:52AM +0800, Guo Ren wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 8:46 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the csky tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > arch/csky/abiv2/cacheflush.c
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > 1222e1310d64 ("csky: implement the new page table range API")
> Could I take this patch into csky next tree to solve the conflict.
No. It depends on the predecessor patches in that series.
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.