Python 3.6 introduced a DeprecationWarning for invalid escape sequences.
This is upgraded to a SyntaxWarning in Python 3.12, and will eventually
be a syntax error.
Fix these now to get ahead of it before it's an error.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gray <bgray@linux.ibm.com>
---
Documentation/sphinx/cdomain.py | 2 +-
Documentation/sphinx/kernel_abi.py | 2 +-
Documentation/sphinx/kernel_feat.py | 2 +-
Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py | 2 +-
Documentation/sphinx/maintainers_include.py | 8 ++++----
5 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/sphinx/cdomain.py b/Documentation/sphinx/cdomain.py
index ca8ac9e59ded..dbdc74bd0772 100644
--- a/Documentation/sphinx/cdomain.py
+++ b/Documentation/sphinx/cdomain.py
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ def markup_ctype_refs(match):
#
RE_expr = re.compile(r':c:(expr|texpr):`([^\`]+)`')
def markup_c_expr(match):
- return '\ ``' + match.group(2) + '``\ '
+ return '\\ ``' + match.group(2) + '``\\ '
#
# Parse Sphinx 3.x C markups, replacing them by backward-compatible ones
diff --git a/Documentation/sphinx/kernel_abi.py b/Documentation/sphinx/kernel_abi.py
index b5feb5b1d905..b9f026f016fd 100644
--- a/Documentation/sphinx/kernel_abi.py
+++ b/Documentation/sphinx/kernel_abi.py
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ class KernelCmd(Directive):
code_block += "\n " + l
lines = code_block + "\n\n"
- line_regex = re.compile("^\.\. LINENO (\S+)\#([0-9]+)$")
+ line_regex = re.compile("^\\.\\. LINENO (\\S+)\\#([0-9]+)$")
ln = 0
n = 0
f = fname
diff --git a/Documentation/sphinx/kernel_feat.py b/Documentation/sphinx/kernel_feat.py
index 27b701ed3681..d17adc1a367a 100644
--- a/Documentation/sphinx/kernel_feat.py
+++ b/Documentation/sphinx/kernel_feat.py
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ class KernelFeat(Directive):
lines = self.runCmd(cmd, shell=True, cwd=cwd, env=shell_env)
- line_regex = re.compile("^\.\. FILE (\S+)$")
+ line_regex = re.compile("^\\.\\. FILE (\\S+)$")
out_lines = ""
diff --git a/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py b/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
index 9395892c7ba3..d6ec34ce2232 100644
--- a/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
+++ b/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
result = ViewList()
lineoffset = 0;
- line_regex = re.compile("^\.\. LINENO ([0-9]+)$")
+ line_regex = re.compile("^\\.\\. LINENO ([0-9]+)$")
for line in lines:
match = line_regex.search(line)
if match:
diff --git a/Documentation/sphinx/maintainers_include.py b/Documentation/sphinx/maintainers_include.py
index 328b3631a585..73be47963153 100755
--- a/Documentation/sphinx/maintainers_include.py
+++ b/Documentation/sphinx/maintainers_include.py
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ class MaintainersInclude(Include):
line = line.rstrip()
# Linkify all non-wildcard refs to ReST files in Documentation/.
- pat = '(Documentation/([^\s\?\*]*)\.rst)'
+ pat = '(Documentation/([^\\s\\?\\*]*)\\.rst)'
m = re.search(pat, line)
if m:
# maintainers.rst is in a subdirectory, so include "../".
@@ -90,11 +90,11 @@ class MaintainersInclude(Include):
output = "| %s" % (line.replace("\\", "\\\\"))
# Look for and record field letter to field name mappings:
# R: Designated *reviewer*: FullName <address@domain>
- m = re.search("\s(\S):\s", line)
+ m = re.search("\\s(\\S):\\s", line)
if m:
field_letter = m.group(1)
if field_letter and not field_letter in fields:
- m = re.search("\*([^\*]+)\*", line)
+ m = re.search("\\*([^\\*]+)\\*", line)
if m:
fields[field_letter] = m.group(1)
elif subsystems:
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ class MaintainersInclude(Include):
field_content = ""
# Collapse whitespace in subsystem name.
- heading = re.sub("\s+", " ", line)
+ heading = re.sub("\\s+", " ", line)
output = output + "%s\n%s" % (heading, "~" * len(heading))
field_prev = ""
else:
--
2.41.0
Benjamin Gray <bgray@linux.ibm.com> writes:
> Python 3.6 introduced a DeprecationWarning for invalid escape sequences.
> This is upgraded to a SyntaxWarning in Python 3.12, and will eventually
> be a syntax error.
>
> Fix these now to get ahead of it before it's an error.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gray <bgray@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> Documentation/sphinx/cdomain.py | 2 +-
> Documentation/sphinx/kernel_abi.py | 2 +-
> Documentation/sphinx/kernel_feat.py | 2 +-
> Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py | 2 +-
> Documentation/sphinx/maintainers_include.py | 8 ++++----
> 5 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
So I am the maintainer for this stuff...is there a reason you didn't
copy me on this work?
> diff --git a/Documentation/sphinx/cdomain.py b/Documentation/sphinx/cdomain.py
> index ca8ac9e59ded..dbdc74bd0772 100644
> --- a/Documentation/sphinx/cdomain.py
> +++ b/Documentation/sphinx/cdomain.py
> @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ def markup_ctype_refs(match):
> #
> RE_expr = re.compile(r':c:(expr|texpr):`([^\`]+)`')
> def markup_c_expr(match):
> - return '\ ``' + match.group(2) + '``\ '
> + return '\\ ``' + match.group(2) + '``\\ '
I have to wonder about this one; I doubt the intent was to insert a
literal backslash. I have to fire up my ancient build environment to
even try this, but even if it's right...
> #
> # Parse Sphinx 3.x C markups, replacing them by backward-compatible ones
> diff --git a/Documentation/sphinx/kernel_abi.py b/Documentation/sphinx/kernel_abi.py
> index b5feb5b1d905..b9f026f016fd 100644
> --- a/Documentation/sphinx/kernel_abi.py
> +++ b/Documentation/sphinx/kernel_abi.py
> @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ class KernelCmd(Directive):
> code_block += "\n " + l
> lines = code_block + "\n\n"
>
> - line_regex = re.compile("^\.\. LINENO (\S+)\#([0-9]+)$")
> + line_regex = re.compile("^\\.\\. LINENO (\\S+)\\#([0-9]+)$")
All of these really just want to be raw strings - a much more minimal
fix that makes the result quite a bit more readable:
line_regex = re.compile(r"^\.\. LINENO (\S+)\#([0-9]+)$")
^
|
---------------------------+
That, I think, is how these should be fixed.
Thanks,
jon
On 14/8/23 11:35 pm, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Benjamin Gray <bgray@linux.ibm.com> writes:
>
>> Python 3.6 introduced a DeprecationWarning for invalid escape sequences.
>> This is upgraded to a SyntaxWarning in Python 3.12, and will eventually
>> be a syntax error.
>>
>> Fix these now to get ahead of it before it's an error.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gray <bgray@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/sphinx/cdomain.py | 2 +-
>> Documentation/sphinx/kernel_abi.py | 2 +-
>> Documentation/sphinx/kernel_feat.py | 2 +-
>> Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py | 2 +-
>> Documentation/sphinx/maintainers_include.py | 8 ++++----
>> 5 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> So I am the maintainer for this stuff...is there a reason you didn't
> copy me on this work?
Sorry, I thought the list linux-doc@vger.kernel.org itself was enough. I
haven't done a cross tree series before, I was a bit adverse to CC'ing
everyone that appears as a maintainer for every patch.
>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/sphinx/cdomain.py b/Documentation/sphinx/cdomain.py
>> index ca8ac9e59ded..dbdc74bd0772 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/sphinx/cdomain.py
>> +++ b/Documentation/sphinx/cdomain.py
>> @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ def markup_ctype_refs(match):
>> #
>> RE_expr = re.compile(r':c:(expr|texpr):`([^\`]+)`')
>> def markup_c_expr(match):
>> - return '\ ``' + match.group(2) + '``\ '
>> + return '\\ ``' + match.group(2) + '``\\ '
>
> I have to wonder about this one; I doubt the intent was to insert a
> literal backslash. I have to fire up my ancient build environment to
> even try this, but even if it's right...
Yeah, there is even a file that just has a syntax error. I don't have a
way to verify the original script was correct, but I have verified this
series doesn't change the parsed AST.
In this case though, it's generating reST, so it might just be
conservatively guarding against generating bad markup[1]
[1]:
https://www.sphinx-doc.org/en/master/usage/restructuredtext/basics.html#inline-markup
>> #
>> # Parse Sphinx 3.x C markups, replacing them by backward-compatible ones
>> diff --git a/Documentation/sphinx/kernel_abi.py b/Documentation/sphinx/kernel_abi.py
>> index b5feb5b1d905..b9f026f016fd 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/sphinx/kernel_abi.py
>> +++ b/Documentation/sphinx/kernel_abi.py
>> @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ class KernelCmd(Directive):
>> code_block += "\n " + l
>> lines = code_block + "\n\n"
>>
>> - line_regex = re.compile("^\.\. LINENO (\S+)\#([0-9]+)$")
>> + line_regex = re.compile("^\\.\\. LINENO (\\S+)\\#([0-9]+)$")
>
> All of these really just want to be raw strings - a much more minimal
> fix that makes the result quite a bit more readable:
>
> line_regex = re.compile(r"^\.\. LINENO (\S+)\#([0-9]+)$")
> ^
> |
> ---------------------------+
>
> That, I think, is how these should be fixed.
Yup, I mentioned that at the end of the cover letter. I can automate and
verify the conversion, but automating what _should_ be treated as a
'regex' string is fuzzier. Checking if there's a `re.*(` prefix on the
string should work for most though. I'll give it a shot.
> Thanks,
>
> jon
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.