drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Dhruva reported a build warning with W=1 for "Function parameter or member
'sysconfig' not described in 'sysc'". Let's document sysconfig to fix this.
Reported-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
---
drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c b/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c
--- a/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c
@@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ static const char * const clock_names[SYSC_MAX_CLOCKS] = {
* @cookie: data used by legacy platform callbacks
* @name: name if available
* @revision: interconnect target module revision
+ * @sysconfig: saved sysconfig register value
* @reserved: target module is reserved and already in use
* @enabled: sysc runtime enabled status
* @needs_resume: runtime resume needed on resume from suspend
--
2.41.0
On Aug 09, 2023 at 12:56:33 +0300, Tony Lindgren wrote: > Dhruva reported a build warning with W=1 for "Function parameter or member > 'sysconfig' not described in 'sysc'". Let's document sysconfig to fix this. > > Reported-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com> > Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> > --- Probably best to include a Fixes: commit no? > drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c b/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c > --- a/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c > +++ b/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c > @@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ static const char * const clock_names[SYSC_MAX_CLOCKS] = { > * @cookie: data used by legacy platform callbacks > * @name: name if available > * @revision: interconnect target module revision > + * @sysconfig: saved sysconfig register value > * @reserved: target module is reserved and already in use > * @enabled: sysc runtime enabled status > * @needs_resume: runtime resume needed on resume from suspend > -- > 2.41.0 -- Best regards, Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>
* Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com> [230809 10:11]: > Probably best to include a Fixes: commit no? Nah, it's a comment fix for W=1 warning for a driver private data struct :) No need to have it applied in stable kernels as far as I can tell. Regards, Tony
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.