On 22.08.2023 10:09, Michael Walle wrote:
> The Atmel AT26DF321 and AT25DF321 have the same ID. Both were just
> discovered by reading their IDs, that is, there is no probing by name.
> Thus only the first one in the list was ever probed. The AT25DF is the
> newer series. Drop the older one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <mwalle@kernel.org>
keep the first entry, to have the name backward compatible. It's not a
hard rule to have the name backward compatible, but if we can, let's
keep it.
Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/atmel.c | 7 -------
> 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/atmel.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/atmel.c
> index 18e904962d0e..95f0e139284e 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/atmel.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/atmel.c
> @@ -206,13 +206,6 @@ static const struct flash_info atmel_nor_parts[] = {
> .flags = SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK | SPI_NOR_SWP_IS_VOLATILE,
> .no_sfdp_flags = SECT_4K,
> .fixups = &atmel_nor_global_protection_fixups
> - }, {
> - .id = SNOR_ID(0x1f, 0x47, 0x00),
> - .name = "at26df321",
> - .size = SZ_4M,
> - .flags = SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK | SPI_NOR_SWP_IS_VOLATILE,
> - .no_sfdp_flags = SECT_4K,
> - .fixups = &atmel_nor_global_protection_fixups
> }, {
> .id = SNOR_ID(0x1f, 0x47, 0x01),
> .name = "at25df321a",
>