This function call was found to be unnecessary as there is no equivalent
platform_get_drvdata() call to access the private data of the driver. Also,
the private data is defined in this driver, so there is no risk of it being
accessed outside of this driver file.

Reviewed-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alex@shruggie.ro>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Coardos <aboutphysycs@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-zevio.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-zevio.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-zevio.c
index f0f571b323f2..2de61337ad3b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-zevio.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-zevio.c
@@ -176,8 +176,6 @@ static int zevio_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (!controller)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, controller);
-
 	/* Copy our reference */
 	controller->chip = zevio_gpio_chip;
 	controller->chip.parent = &pdev->dev;
-- 
2.34.1

On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 10:46 PM Andrei Coardos <aboutphysycs@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This function call was found to be unnecessary as there is no equivalent
> platform_get_drvdata() call to access the private data of the driver. Also,
> the private data is defined in this driver, so there is no risk of it being
> accessed outside of this driver file.
>
> Reviewed-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alex@shruggie.ro>
> Signed-off-by: Andrei Coardos <aboutphysycs@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-zevio.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-zevio.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-zevio.c
> index f0f571b323f2..2de61337ad3b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-zevio.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-zevio.c
> @@ -176,8 +176,6 @@ static int zevio_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         if (!controller)
>                 return -ENOMEM;
>
> -       platform_set_drvdata(pdev, controller);
> -
>         /* Copy our reference */
>         controller->chip = zevio_gpio_chip;
>         controller->chip.parent = &pdev->dev;
> --
> 2.34.1
>

Applied, thanks!

Bart

On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 11:46:06PM +0300, Andrei Coardos wrote:
> This function call was found to be unnecessary as there is no equivalent
> platform_get_drvdata() call to access the private data of the driver. Also,
> the private data is defined in this driver, so there is no risk of it being
> accessed outside of this driver file.

Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko