This function call was found to be unnecessary as there is no equivalent
platform_get_drvdata() call to access the private data of the driver. Also,
the private data is defined in this driver, so there is no risk of it being
accessed outside of this driver file.

Reviewed-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alex@shruggie.ro>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Coardos <aboutphysycs@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-tqmx86.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tqmx86.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tqmx86.c
index 6f8bd1155db7..3a28c1f273c3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tqmx86.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tqmx86.c
@@ -277,8 +277,6 @@ static int tqmx86_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	tqmx86_gpio_write(gpio, (u8)~TQMX86_DIR_INPUT_MASK, TQMX86_GPIODD);
 
-	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, gpio);
-
 	chip = &gpio->chip;
 	chip->label = "gpio-tqmx86";
 	chip->owner = THIS_MODULE;
-- 
2.34.1

On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 10:43 PM Andrei Coardos <aboutphysycs@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This function call was found to be unnecessary as there is no equivalent
> platform_get_drvdata() call to access the private data of the driver. Also,
> the private data is defined in this driver, so there is no risk of it being
> accessed outside of this driver file.
>
> Reviewed-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alex@shruggie.ro>
> Signed-off-by: Andrei Coardos <aboutphysycs@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-tqmx86.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tqmx86.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tqmx86.c
> index 6f8bd1155db7..3a28c1f273c3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tqmx86.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tqmx86.c
> @@ -277,8 +277,6 @@ static int tqmx86_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
>         tqmx86_gpio_write(gpio, (u8)~TQMX86_DIR_INPUT_MASK, TQMX86_GPIODD);
>
> -       platform_set_drvdata(pdev, gpio);
> -
>         chip = &gpio->chip;
>         chip->label = "gpio-tqmx86";
>         chip->owner = THIS_MODULE;
> --
> 2.34.1
>

Applied, thanks!

Bart

On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 11:43 PM Andrei Coardos <aboutphysycs@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This function call was found to be unnecessary as there is no equivalent
> platform_get_drvdata() call to access the private data of the driver. Also,
> the private data is defined in this driver, so there is no risk of it being
> accessed outside of this driver file.

Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko