This function call was found to be unnecessary as there is no equivalent
platform_get_drvdata() call to access the private data of the driver. Also,
the private data is defined in this driver, so there is no risk of it being
accessed outside of this driver file.

Reviewed-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alex@shruggie.ro>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Coardos <aboutphysycs@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-sifive.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sifive.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sifive.c
index c6a8d2374e31..0010f607a9ef 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sifive.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sifive.c
@@ -259,7 +259,6 @@ static int sifive_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	girq->child_to_parent_hwirq = sifive_gpio_child_to_parent_hwirq;
 	girq->handler = handle_bad_irq;
 	girq->default_type = IRQ_TYPE_NONE;
-	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, priv);
 
 	return gpiochip_add_data(&chip->gc, chip);
 }
-- 
2.34.1

On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 9:44 AM Andrei Coardos <aboutphysycs@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This function call was found to be unnecessary as there is no equivalent
> platform_get_drvdata() call to access the private data of the driver. Also,
> the private data is defined in this driver, so there is no risk of it being
> accessed outside of this driver file.
>
> Reviewed-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alex@shruggie.ro>
> Signed-off-by: Andrei Coardos <aboutphysycs@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-sifive.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sifive.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sifive.c
> index c6a8d2374e31..0010f607a9ef 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sifive.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sifive.c
> @@ -259,7 +259,6 @@ static int sifive_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         girq->child_to_parent_hwirq = sifive_gpio_child_to_parent_hwirq;
>         girq->handler = handle_bad_irq;
>         girq->default_type = IRQ_TYPE_NONE;
> -       platform_set_drvdata(pdev, priv);
>
>         return gpiochip_add_data(&chip->gc, chip);
>  }
> --
> 2.34.1
>

This patch does not correspond with the code upstream. Please verify.

Bart

On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 10:44:30AM +0300, Andrei Coardos wrote:
> This function call was found to be unnecessary as there is no equivalent
> platform_get_drvdata() call to access the private data of the driver. Also,
> the private data is defined in this driver, so there is no risk of it being
> accessed outside of this driver file.

Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko