tty->disc_data is 'void *', so there is no need to cast from that.
Therefore remove the casts and assign the pointer directly.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby (SUSE) <jirislaby@kernel.org>
Cc: Max Staudt <max@enpas.org>
Cc: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-can@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
---
net/nfc/nci/uart.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/nfc/nci/uart.c b/net/nfc/nci/uart.c
index cc8fa9e36159..082f94be0996 100644
--- a/net/nfc/nci/uart.c
+++ b/net/nfc/nci/uart.c
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ static int nci_uart_tty_open(struct tty_struct *tty)
*/
static void nci_uart_tty_close(struct tty_struct *tty)
{
- struct nci_uart *nu = (void *)tty->disc_data;
+ struct nci_uart *nu = tty->disc_data;
/* Detach from the tty */
tty->disc_data = NULL;
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ static void nci_uart_tty_close(struct tty_struct *tty)
*/
static void nci_uart_tty_wakeup(struct tty_struct *tty)
{
- struct nci_uart *nu = (void *)tty->disc_data;
+ struct nci_uart *nu = tty->disc_data;
if (!nu)
return;
@@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ static int nci_uart_default_recv_buf(struct nci_uart *nu, const u8 *data,
static void nci_uart_tty_receive(struct tty_struct *tty, const u8 *data,
const char *flags, int count)
{
- struct nci_uart *nu = (void *)tty->disc_data;
+ struct nci_uart *nu = tty->disc_data;
if (!nu || tty != nu->tty)
return;
@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ static void nci_uart_tty_receive(struct tty_struct *tty, const u8 *data,
static int nci_uart_tty_ioctl(struct tty_struct *tty, unsigned int cmd,
unsigned long arg)
{
- struct nci_uart *nu = (void *)tty->disc_data;
+ struct nci_uart *nu = tty->disc_data;
int err = 0;
switch (cmd) {
--
2.41.0
On Tue, 1 Aug 2023 08:22:37 +0200 Jiri Slaby (SUSE) wrote: > tty->disc_data is 'void *', so there is no need to cast from that. > Therefore remove the casts and assign the pointer directly. Which tree are these expected to flow thru?
On 02. 08. 23, 21:07, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Tue, 1 Aug 2023 08:22:37 +0200 Jiri Slaby (SUSE) wrote: >> tty->disc_data is 'void *', so there is no need to cast from that. >> Therefore remove the casts and assign the pointer directly. > > Which tree are these expected to flow thru? The intention was through the tty tree. But I don't mind either way -- it's up to you Greg. thanks, -- js suse labs
On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 07:08:07AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote: > On 02. 08. 23, 21:07, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Tue, 1 Aug 2023 08:22:37 +0200 Jiri Slaby (SUSE) wrote: > > > tty->disc_data is 'void *', so there is no need to cast from that. > > > Therefore remove the casts and assign the pointer directly. > > > > Which tree are these expected to flow thru? > > The intention was through the tty tree. But I don't mind either way -- it's > up to you Greg. I'll take them, thanks! greg k-h
On 8/1/23 15:22, Jiri Slaby (SUSE) wrote: > tty->disc_data is 'void *', so there is no need to cast from that. > Therefore remove the casts and assign the pointer directly. > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby (SUSE) <jirislaby@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Max Staudt <max@enpas.org>
On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 08:22:37AM +0200, Jiri Slaby (SUSE) wrote: > tty->disc_data is 'void *', so there is no need to cast from that. > Therefore remove the casts and assign the pointer directly. > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby (SUSE) <jirislaby@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.