[PATCH] gpio: sama5d2-piobu: remove unneeded call to platform_set_drvdata()

Andrei Coardos posted 1 patch 2 years, 6 months ago
drivers/gpio/gpio-sama5d2-piobu.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
[PATCH] gpio: sama5d2-piobu: remove unneeded call to platform_set_drvdata()
Posted by Andrei Coardos 2 years, 6 months ago
This function call was found to be unnecessary as there is no equivalent
platform_get_drvdata() call to access the private data of the driver. Also,
the private data is defined in this driver, so there is no risk of it being
accessed outside of this driver file.

Reviewed-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alex@shruggie.ro>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Coardos <aboutphysycs@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-sama5d2-piobu.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sama5d2-piobu.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sama5d2-piobu.c
index 767c33ae3213..d89da7300ddd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sama5d2-piobu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sama5d2-piobu.c
@@ -189,7 +189,6 @@ static int sama5d2_piobu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (!piobu)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, piobu);
 	piobu->chip.label = pdev->name;
 	piobu->chip.parent = &pdev->dev;
 	piobu->chip.owner = THIS_MODULE,
-- 
2.34.1
Re: [PATCH] gpio: sama5d2-piobu: remove unneeded call to platform_set_drvdata()
Posted by claudiu beznea 2 years, 6 months ago

On 28.07.2023 21:25, Andrei Coardos wrote:
> This function call was found to be unnecessary as there is no equivalent
> platform_get_drvdata() call to access the private data of the driver. Also,
> the private data is defined in this driver, so there is no risk of it being
> accessed outside of this driver file.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alex@shruggie.ro>
> Signed-off-by: Andrei Coardos <aboutphysycs@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>

> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-sama5d2-piobu.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sama5d2-piobu.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sama5d2-piobu.c
> index 767c33ae3213..d89da7300ddd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sama5d2-piobu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sama5d2-piobu.c
> @@ -189,7 +189,6 @@ static int sama5d2_piobu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (!piobu)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, piobu);
>  	piobu->chip.label = pdev->name;
>  	piobu->chip.parent = &pdev->dev;
>  	piobu->chip.owner = THIS_MODULE,
Re: [PATCH] gpio: sama5d2-piobu: remove unneeded call to platform_set_drvdata()
Posted by Bartosz Golaszewski 2 years, 6 months ago
On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 8:25 PM Andrei Coardos <aboutphysycs@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This function call was found to be unnecessary as there is no equivalent
> platform_get_drvdata() call to access the private data of the driver. Also,
> the private data is defined in this driver, so there is no risk of it being
> accessed outside of this driver file.
>
> Reviewed-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alex@shruggie.ro>
> Signed-off-by: Andrei Coardos <aboutphysycs@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-sama5d2-piobu.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sama5d2-piobu.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sama5d2-piobu.c
> index 767c33ae3213..d89da7300ddd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sama5d2-piobu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sama5d2-piobu.c
> @@ -189,7 +189,6 @@ static int sama5d2_piobu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         if (!piobu)
>                 return -ENOMEM;
>
> -       platform_set_drvdata(pdev, piobu);
>         piobu->chip.label = pdev->name;
>         piobu->chip.parent = &pdev->dev;
>         piobu->chip.owner = THIS_MODULE,
> --
> 2.34.1
>

Applied, thanks!

Bartosz
Re: [PATCH] gpio: sama5d2-piobu: remove unneeded call to platform_set_drvdata()
Posted by Andy Shevchenko 2 years, 6 months ago
On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 9:25 PM Andrei Coardos <aboutphysycs@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This function call was found to be unnecessary as there is no equivalent
> platform_get_drvdata() call to access the private data of the driver. Also,
> the private data is defined in this driver, so there is no risk of it being
> accessed outside of this driver file.

Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko