In old code, we set skip to found page block in fast_find_migrateblock. So
we use fast_find_block to avoid skip found page block from
fast_find_migrateblock.
In 90ed667c03fe5 ("Revert "Revert "mm/compaction: fix set skip in
fast_find_migrateblock"""), we remove skip set in fast_find_migrateblock,
then fast_find_block is useless.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
---
mm/compaction.c | 12 +-----------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
index ad535f880c70..09c36251c613 100644
--- a/mm/compaction.c
+++ b/mm/compaction.c
@@ -1949,7 +1949,6 @@ static isolate_migrate_t isolate_migratepages(struct compact_control *cc)
const isolate_mode_t isolate_mode =
(sysctl_compact_unevictable_allowed ? ISOLATE_UNEVICTABLE : 0) |
(cc->mode != MIGRATE_SYNC ? ISOLATE_ASYNC_MIGRATE : 0);
- bool fast_find_block;
/*
* Start at where we last stopped, or beginning of the zone as
@@ -1961,13 +1960,6 @@ static isolate_migrate_t isolate_migratepages(struct compact_control *cc)
if (block_start_pfn < cc->zone->zone_start_pfn)
block_start_pfn = cc->zone->zone_start_pfn;
- /*
- * fast_find_migrateblock marks a pageblock skipped so to avoid
- * the isolation_suitable check below, check whether the fast
- * search was successful.
- */
- fast_find_block = low_pfn != cc->migrate_pfn && !cc->fast_search_fail;
-
/* Only scan within a pageblock boundary */
block_end_pfn = pageblock_end_pfn(low_pfn);
@@ -1976,7 +1968,6 @@ static isolate_migrate_t isolate_migratepages(struct compact_control *cc)
* Do not cross the free scanner.
*/
for (; block_end_pfn <= cc->free_pfn;
- fast_find_block = false,
cc->migrate_pfn = low_pfn = block_end_pfn,
block_start_pfn = block_end_pfn,
block_end_pfn += pageblock_nr_pages) {
@@ -2007,8 +1998,7 @@ static isolate_migrate_t isolate_migratepages(struct compact_control *cc)
* before making it "skip" so other compaction instances do
* not scan the same block.
*/
- if (pageblock_aligned(low_pfn) &&
- !fast_find_block && !isolation_suitable(cc, page))
+ if (pageblock_aligned(low_pfn) && !isolation_suitable(cc, page))
continue;
/*
--
2.30.0
On 7/29/2023 1:10 AM, Kemeng Shi wrote:
> In old code, we set skip to found page block in fast_find_migrateblock. So
> we use fast_find_block to avoid skip found page block from
> fast_find_migrateblock.
> In 90ed667c03fe5 ("Revert "Revert "mm/compaction: fix set skip in
> fast_find_migrateblock"""), we remove skip set in fast_find_migrateblock,
> then fast_find_block is useless.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
> ---
> mm/compaction.c | 12 +-----------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
> index ad535f880c70..09c36251c613 100644
> --- a/mm/compaction.c
> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
> @@ -1949,7 +1949,6 @@ static isolate_migrate_t isolate_migratepages(struct compact_control *cc)
> const isolate_mode_t isolate_mode =
> (sysctl_compact_unevictable_allowed ? ISOLATE_UNEVICTABLE : 0) |
> (cc->mode != MIGRATE_SYNC ? ISOLATE_ASYNC_MIGRATE : 0);
> - bool fast_find_block;
>
> /*
> * Start at where we last stopped, or beginning of the zone as
> @@ -1961,13 +1960,6 @@ static isolate_migrate_t isolate_migratepages(struct compact_control *cc)
> if (block_start_pfn < cc->zone->zone_start_pfn)
> block_start_pfn = cc->zone->zone_start_pfn;
>
> - /*
> - * fast_find_migrateblock marks a pageblock skipped so to avoid
> - * the isolation_suitable check below, check whether the fast
> - * search was successful.
> - */
> - fast_find_block = low_pfn != cc->migrate_pfn && !cc->fast_search_fail;
> -
> /* Only scan within a pageblock boundary */
> block_end_pfn = pageblock_end_pfn(low_pfn);
>
> @@ -1976,7 +1968,6 @@ static isolate_migrate_t isolate_migratepages(struct compact_control *cc)
> * Do not cross the free scanner.
> */
> for (; block_end_pfn <= cc->free_pfn;
> - fast_find_block = false,
> cc->migrate_pfn = low_pfn = block_end_pfn,
> block_start_pfn = block_end_pfn,
> block_end_pfn += pageblock_nr_pages) {
> @@ -2007,8 +1998,7 @@ static isolate_migrate_t isolate_migratepages(struct compact_control *cc)
> * before making it "skip" so other compaction instances do
> * not scan the same block.
> */
> - if (pageblock_aligned(low_pfn) &&
> - !fast_find_block && !isolation_suitable(cc, page))
> + if (pageblock_aligned(low_pfn) && !isolation_suitable(cc, page))
I do not think so. If the pageblock is found by
fast_find_migrateblock(), that means it definitely has not been set the
skip flag, so there is not need to call isolation_suitable() if
fast_find_block is true, right?
on 8/1/2023 10:42 AM, Baolin Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 7/29/2023 1:10 AM, Kemeng Shi wrote:
>> In old code, we set skip to found page block in fast_find_migrateblock. So
>> we use fast_find_block to avoid skip found page block from
>> fast_find_migrateblock.
>> In 90ed667c03fe5 ("Revert "Revert "mm/compaction: fix set skip in
>> fast_find_migrateblock"""), we remove skip set in fast_find_migrateblock,
>> then fast_find_block is useless.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
>> ---
>> mm/compaction.c | 12 +-----------
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
>> index ad535f880c70..09c36251c613 100644
>> --- a/mm/compaction.c
>> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
>> @@ -1949,7 +1949,6 @@ static isolate_migrate_t isolate_migratepages(struct compact_control *cc)
>> const isolate_mode_t isolate_mode =
>> (sysctl_compact_unevictable_allowed ? ISOLATE_UNEVICTABLE : 0) |
>> (cc->mode != MIGRATE_SYNC ? ISOLATE_ASYNC_MIGRATE : 0);
>> - bool fast_find_block;
>> /*
>> * Start at where we last stopped, or beginning of the zone as
>> @@ -1961,13 +1960,6 @@ static isolate_migrate_t isolate_migratepages(struct compact_control *cc)
>> if (block_start_pfn < cc->zone->zone_start_pfn)
>> block_start_pfn = cc->zone->zone_start_pfn;
>> - /*
>> - * fast_find_migrateblock marks a pageblock skipped so to avoid
>> - * the isolation_suitable check below, check whether the fast
>> - * search was successful.
>> - */
>> - fast_find_block = low_pfn != cc->migrate_pfn && !cc->fast_search_fail;
>> -
>> /* Only scan within a pageblock boundary */
>> block_end_pfn = pageblock_end_pfn(low_pfn);
>> @@ -1976,7 +1968,6 @@ static isolate_migrate_t isolate_migratepages(struct compact_control *cc)
>> * Do not cross the free scanner.
>> */
>> for (; block_end_pfn <= cc->free_pfn;
>> - fast_find_block = false,
>> cc->migrate_pfn = low_pfn = block_end_pfn,
>> block_start_pfn = block_end_pfn,
>> block_end_pfn += pageblock_nr_pages) {
>> @@ -2007,8 +1998,7 @@ static isolate_migrate_t isolate_migratepages(struct compact_control *cc)
>> * before making it "skip" so other compaction instances do
>> * not scan the same block.
>> */
>> - if (pageblock_aligned(low_pfn) &&
>> - !fast_find_block && !isolation_suitable(cc, page))
>> + if (pageblock_aligned(low_pfn) && !isolation_suitable(cc, page))
>
> I do not think so. If the pageblock is found by fast_find_migrateblock(), that means it definitely has not been set the skip flag, so there is not need to call isolation_suitable() if fast_find_block is true, right?
>
>
Actually, found pageblock could be set skip as:
1. other compactor could mark this pageblock as skip after zone lock is realeased
in fast_find_migrateblock.
2. fast_find_migrateblock may uses pfn from reinit_migrate_pfn which is previously found
and sacnned. It could be fully sacnned and marked skip after it's first return from
fast_find_migrateblock and it should be skipped.
Thanks!
--
Best wishes
Kemeng Shi
On 8/1/2023 11:24 AM, Kemeng Shi wrote:
>
>
> on 8/1/2023 10:42 AM, Baolin Wang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 7/29/2023 1:10 AM, Kemeng Shi wrote:
>>> In old code, we set skip to found page block in fast_find_migrateblock. So
>>> we use fast_find_block to avoid skip found page block from
>>> fast_find_migrateblock.
>>> In 90ed667c03fe5 ("Revert "Revert "mm/compaction: fix set skip in
>>> fast_find_migrateblock"""), we remove skip set in fast_find_migrateblock,
>>> then fast_find_block is useless.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
>>> ---
>>> mm/compaction.c | 12 +-----------
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
>>> index ad535f880c70..09c36251c613 100644
>>> --- a/mm/compaction.c
>>> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
>>> @@ -1949,7 +1949,6 @@ static isolate_migrate_t isolate_migratepages(struct compact_control *cc)
>>> const isolate_mode_t isolate_mode =
>>> (sysctl_compact_unevictable_allowed ? ISOLATE_UNEVICTABLE : 0) |
>>> (cc->mode != MIGRATE_SYNC ? ISOLATE_ASYNC_MIGRATE : 0);
>>> - bool fast_find_block;
>>> /*
>>> * Start at where we last stopped, or beginning of the zone as
>>> @@ -1961,13 +1960,6 @@ static isolate_migrate_t isolate_migratepages(struct compact_control *cc)
>>> if (block_start_pfn < cc->zone->zone_start_pfn)
>>> block_start_pfn = cc->zone->zone_start_pfn;
>>> - /*
>>> - * fast_find_migrateblock marks a pageblock skipped so to avoid
>>> - * the isolation_suitable check below, check whether the fast
>>> - * search was successful.
>>> - */
>>> - fast_find_block = low_pfn != cc->migrate_pfn && !cc->fast_search_fail;
>>> -
>>> /* Only scan within a pageblock boundary */
>>> block_end_pfn = pageblock_end_pfn(low_pfn);
>>> @@ -1976,7 +1968,6 @@ static isolate_migrate_t isolate_migratepages(struct compact_control *cc)
>>> * Do not cross the free scanner.
>>> */
>>> for (; block_end_pfn <= cc->free_pfn;
>>> - fast_find_block = false,
>>> cc->migrate_pfn = low_pfn = block_end_pfn,
>>> block_start_pfn = block_end_pfn,
>>> block_end_pfn += pageblock_nr_pages) {
>>> @@ -2007,8 +1998,7 @@ static isolate_migrate_t isolate_migratepages(struct compact_control *cc)
>>> * before making it "skip" so other compaction instances do
>>> * not scan the same block.
>>> */
>>> - if (pageblock_aligned(low_pfn) &&
>>> - !fast_find_block && !isolation_suitable(cc, page))
>>> + if (pageblock_aligned(low_pfn) && !isolation_suitable(cc, page))
>>
>> I do not think so. If the pageblock is found by fast_find_migrateblock(), that means it definitely has not been set the skip flag, so there is not need to call isolation_suitable() if fast_find_block is true, right?
>>
>>
> Actually, found pageblock could be set skip as:
> 1. other compactor could mark this pageblock as skip after zone lock is realeased
> in fast_find_migrateblock.
Yes, but your patch also can not close this race window, that means it
can also be set skip flag after the isolation_suitable() validation by
other compactors.
> 2. fast_find_migrateblock may uses pfn from reinit_migrate_pfn which is previously found
> and sacnned. It could be fully sacnned and marked skip after it's first return from
Right, but now the 'fast_find_block' is false, and we will call
isolation_suitable() to validate the skip flag.
> fast_find_migrateblock and it should be skipped.
> Thanks!
on 8/1/2023 11:34 AM, Baolin Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 8/1/2023 11:24 AM, Kemeng Shi wrote:
>>
>>
>> on 8/1/2023 10:42 AM, Baolin Wang wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7/29/2023 1:10 AM, Kemeng Shi wrote:
>>>> In old code, we set skip to found page block in fast_find_migrateblock. So
>>>> we use fast_find_block to avoid skip found page block from
>>>> fast_find_migrateblock.
>>>> In 90ed667c03fe5 ("Revert "Revert "mm/compaction: fix set skip in
>>>> fast_find_migrateblock"""), we remove skip set in fast_find_migrateblock,
>>>> then fast_find_block is useless.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> mm/compaction.c | 12 +-----------
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
>>>> index ad535f880c70..09c36251c613 100644
>>>> --- a/mm/compaction.c
>>>> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
>>>> @@ -1949,7 +1949,6 @@ static isolate_migrate_t isolate_migratepages(struct compact_control *cc)
>>>> const isolate_mode_t isolate_mode =
>>>> (sysctl_compact_unevictable_allowed ? ISOLATE_UNEVICTABLE : 0) |
>>>> (cc->mode != MIGRATE_SYNC ? ISOLATE_ASYNC_MIGRATE : 0);
>>>> - bool fast_find_block;
>>>> /*
>>>> * Start at where we last stopped, or beginning of the zone as
>>>> @@ -1961,13 +1960,6 @@ static isolate_migrate_t isolate_migratepages(struct compact_control *cc)
>>>> if (block_start_pfn < cc->zone->zone_start_pfn)
>>>> block_start_pfn = cc->zone->zone_start_pfn;
>>>> - /*
>>>> - * fast_find_migrateblock marks a pageblock skipped so to avoid
>>>> - * the isolation_suitable check below, check whether the fast
>>>> - * search was successful.
>>>> - */
>>>> - fast_find_block = low_pfn != cc->migrate_pfn && !cc->fast_search_fail;
>>>> -
>>>> /* Only scan within a pageblock boundary */
>>>> block_end_pfn = pageblock_end_pfn(low_pfn);
>>>> @@ -1976,7 +1968,6 @@ static isolate_migrate_t isolate_migratepages(struct compact_control *cc)
>>>> * Do not cross the free scanner.
>>>> */
>>>> for (; block_end_pfn <= cc->free_pfn;
>>>> - fast_find_block = false,
>>>> cc->migrate_pfn = low_pfn = block_end_pfn,
>>>> block_start_pfn = block_end_pfn,
>>>> block_end_pfn += pageblock_nr_pages) {
>>>> @@ -2007,8 +1998,7 @@ static isolate_migrate_t isolate_migratepages(struct compact_control *cc)
>>>> * before making it "skip" so other compaction instances do
>>>> * not scan the same block.
>>>> */
>>>> - if (pageblock_aligned(low_pfn) &&
>>>> - !fast_find_block && !isolation_suitable(cc, page))
>>>> + if (pageblock_aligned(low_pfn) && !isolation_suitable(cc, page))
>>>
>>> I do not think so. If the pageblock is found by fast_find_migrateblock(), that means it definitely has not been set the skip flag, so there is not need to call isolation_suitable() if fast_find_block is true, right?
>>>
>>>
>> Actually, found pageblock could be set skip as:
>> 1. other compactor could mark this pageblock as skip after zone lock is realeased
>> in fast_find_migrateblock.
>
> Yes, but your patch also can not close this race window, that means it can also be set skip flag after the isolation_suitable() validation by other compactors.
>
Yes, I think it's still worth to remove a lot of fast_find_block relevant check and reduce
code complexity with one redundant isolation_suitable which may skip some block with luck.
>> 2. fast_find_migrateblock may uses pfn from reinit_migrate_pfn which is previously found
>> and sacnned. It could be fully sacnned and marked skip after it's first return from
>
> Right, but now the 'fast_find_block' is false, and we will call isolation_suitable() to validate the skip flag.
>
Right, sorry for missing that.
But it's ok to keep the fast_find_block if you insist and I will just correct the stale
comment that "fast_find_migrateblock marks a pageblock skipped ..." in next version.
Thanks!
>> fast_find_migrateblock and it should be skipped.
>> Thanks!
>
--
Best wishes
Kemeng Shi
On 8/1/2023 11:48 AM, Kemeng Shi wrote:
>
>
> on 8/1/2023 11:34 AM, Baolin Wang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 8/1/2023 11:24 AM, Kemeng Shi wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> on 8/1/2023 10:42 AM, Baolin Wang wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 7/29/2023 1:10 AM, Kemeng Shi wrote:
>>>>> In old code, we set skip to found page block in fast_find_migrateblock. So
>>>>> we use fast_find_block to avoid skip found page block from
>>>>> fast_find_migrateblock.
>>>>> In 90ed667c03fe5 ("Revert "Revert "mm/compaction: fix set skip in
>>>>> fast_find_migrateblock"""), we remove skip set in fast_find_migrateblock,
>>>>> then fast_find_block is useless.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> mm/compaction.c | 12 +-----------
>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
>>>>> index ad535f880c70..09c36251c613 100644
>>>>> --- a/mm/compaction.c
>>>>> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
>>>>> @@ -1949,7 +1949,6 @@ static isolate_migrate_t isolate_migratepages(struct compact_control *cc)
>>>>> const isolate_mode_t isolate_mode =
>>>>> (sysctl_compact_unevictable_allowed ? ISOLATE_UNEVICTABLE : 0) |
>>>>> (cc->mode != MIGRATE_SYNC ? ISOLATE_ASYNC_MIGRATE : 0);
>>>>> - bool fast_find_block;
>>>>> /*
>>>>> * Start at where we last stopped, or beginning of the zone as
>>>>> @@ -1961,13 +1960,6 @@ static isolate_migrate_t isolate_migratepages(struct compact_control *cc)
>>>>> if (block_start_pfn < cc->zone->zone_start_pfn)
>>>>> block_start_pfn = cc->zone->zone_start_pfn;
>>>>> - /*
>>>>> - * fast_find_migrateblock marks a pageblock skipped so to avoid
>>>>> - * the isolation_suitable check below, check whether the fast
>>>>> - * search was successful.
>>>>> - */
>>>>> - fast_find_block = low_pfn != cc->migrate_pfn && !cc->fast_search_fail;
>>>>> -
>>>>> /* Only scan within a pageblock boundary */
>>>>> block_end_pfn = pageblock_end_pfn(low_pfn);
>>>>> @@ -1976,7 +1968,6 @@ static isolate_migrate_t isolate_migratepages(struct compact_control *cc)
>>>>> * Do not cross the free scanner.
>>>>> */
>>>>> for (; block_end_pfn <= cc->free_pfn;
>>>>> - fast_find_block = false,
>>>>> cc->migrate_pfn = low_pfn = block_end_pfn,
>>>>> block_start_pfn = block_end_pfn,
>>>>> block_end_pfn += pageblock_nr_pages) {
>>>>> @@ -2007,8 +1998,7 @@ static isolate_migrate_t isolate_migratepages(struct compact_control *cc)
>>>>> * before making it "skip" so other compaction instances do
>>>>> * not scan the same block.
>>>>> */
>>>>> - if (pageblock_aligned(low_pfn) &&
>>>>> - !fast_find_block && !isolation_suitable(cc, page))
>>>>> + if (pageblock_aligned(low_pfn) && !isolation_suitable(cc, page))
>>>>
>>>> I do not think so. If the pageblock is found by fast_find_migrateblock(), that means it definitely has not been set the skip flag, so there is not need to call isolation_suitable() if fast_find_block is true, right?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Actually, found pageblock could be set skip as:
>>> 1. other compactor could mark this pageblock as skip after zone lock is realeased
>>> in fast_find_migrateblock.
>>
>> Yes, but your patch also can not close this race window, that means it can also be set skip flag after the isolation_suitable() validation by other compactors.
>>
> Yes, I think it's still worth to remove a lot of fast_find_block relevant check and reduce
> code complexity with one redundant isolation_suitable which may skip some block with luck.
>>> 2. fast_find_migrateblock may uses pfn from reinit_migrate_pfn which is previously found
>>> and sacnned. It could be fully sacnned and marked skip after it's first return from
>>
>> Right, but now the 'fast_find_block' is false, and we will call isolation_suitable() to validate the skip flag.
>>
> Right, sorry for missing that.
>
> But it's ok to keep the fast_find_block if you insist and I will just correct the stale
Yes, I still prefer to keep the fast_find_block, since I did not see
this patch can fix any real issue and might have a side effect for
fast-find-pageblock(?).
> comment that "fast_find_migrateblock marks a pageblock skipped ..." in next version.
Sure, please do it.
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.