drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_ili9341.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Using FBTFT_REGISTER_DRIVER resolves to a NULL struct spi_device_id. This
ultimately causes a warning when the module probes. Fixes it.
Changes in v2:
- dropped MODULE_ALIAS changes
- changed commit log for more accurate description
Signed-off-by: Raphael Gallais-Pou <rgallaispou@gmail.com>
---
drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_ili9341.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_ili9341.c b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_ili9341.c
index 9ccd0823c3ab..47e72b87d76d 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_ili9341.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_ili9341.c
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static struct fbtft_display display = {
},
};
-FBTFT_REGISTER_DRIVER(DRVNAME, "ilitek,ili9341", &display);
+FBTFT_REGISTER_SPI_DRIVER(DRVNAME, "ilitek", "ili9341", &display);
MODULE_ALIAS("spi:" DRVNAME);
MODULE_ALIAS("platform:" DRVNAME);
--
2.41.0
On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 10:17:59AM +0200, Raphael Gallais-Pou wrote: > Using FBTFT_REGISTER_DRIVER resolves to a NULL struct spi_device_id. This > ultimately causes a warning when the module probes. Fixes it. > > Changes in v2: > - dropped MODULE_ALIAS changes > - changed commit log for more accurate description > > Signed-off-by: Raphael Gallais-Pou <rgallaispou@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_ili9341.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Why is this a resend? And the changes need to go below the --- line as per the documentation. thanks, greg k-h
Hi, Le 18/07/2023 à 15:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman a écrit : > On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 10:17:59AM +0200, Raphael Gallais-Pou wrote: >> Using FBTFT_REGISTER_DRIVER resolves to a NULL struct spi_device_id. This >> ultimately causes a warning when the module probes. Fixes it. >> >> Changes in v2: >> - dropped MODULE_ALIAS changes >> - changed commit log for more accurate description >> >> Signed-off-by: Raphael Gallais-Pou <rgallaispou@gmail.com> >> --- >> drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_ili9341.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > Why is this a resend? > > And the changes need to go below the --- line as per the documentation. I messed up the first send and forgot the changelog. Thanks for your insights, I understand now that I shouldn't have sent a 'RESEND', but rather a v3 with a third entry in the changelog. Regards, Raphaël > > thanks, > > greg k-h
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.