drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/serdes.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
Fixes XAUI/RXAUI lane alignment errors.
Issue causes dropped packets when trying to communicate over
fiber via SERDES lanes of port 9 and 10.
Signed-off-by: Ante Knezic <ante.knezic@helmholz.de>
---
drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/serdes.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/serdes.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/serdes.c
index 80167d53212f..a8340b300c92 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/serdes.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/serdes.c
@@ -829,6 +829,37 @@ static int mv88e6390_serdes_enable_checker(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int lane
MV88E6390_PG_CONTROL, reg);
}
+static int mv88e6390x_serdes_erratum_3_14(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip)
+{
+ int lanes[] = { MV88E6390_PORT9_LANE0, MV88E6390_PORT9_LANE1,
+ MV88E6390_PORT9_LANE2, MV88E6390_PORT9_LANE3,
+ MV88E6390_PORT10_LANE0, MV88E6390_PORT10_LANE1,
+ MV88E6390_PORT10_LANE2, MV88E6390_PORT10_LANE3 };
+ int err, i;
+
+ /* 88e6390x-88e6190x errata 3.14:
+ * After chip reset, SERDES reconfiguration or SERDES core
+ * Software Reset, the SERDES lanes may not be properly aligned
+ * resulting in CRC errors
+ */
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(lanes); i++) {
+ err = mv88e6390_serdes_write(chip, lanes[i],
+ MDIO_MMD_PHYXS,
+ 0xf054, 0x400C);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ err = mv88e6390_serdes_write(chip, lanes[i],
+ MDIO_MMD_PHYXS,
+ 0xf054, 0x4000);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
int mv88e6390_serdes_power(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int port, int lane,
bool up)
{
@@ -853,6 +884,12 @@ int mv88e6390_serdes_power(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int port, int lane,
if (!err && up)
err = mv88e6390_serdes_enable_checker(chip, lane);
+ if (!err && up) {
+ if (chip->info->prod_num == MV88E6XXX_PORT_SWITCH_ID_PROD_6390X ||
+ chip->info->prod_num == MV88E6XXX_PORT_SWITCH_ID_PROD_6190X)
+ err = mv88e6390x_serdes_erratum_3_14(chip);
+ }
+
return err;
}
--
2.11.0
> +static int mv88e6390x_serdes_erratum_3_14(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip)
> +{
> + int lanes[] = { MV88E6390_PORT9_LANE0, MV88E6390_PORT9_LANE1,
> + MV88E6390_PORT9_LANE2, MV88E6390_PORT9_LANE3,
> + MV88E6390_PORT10_LANE0, MV88E6390_PORT10_LANE1,
> + MV88E6390_PORT10_LANE2, MV88E6390_PORT10_LANE3 };
Please make this const. Otherwise you end up with two copies of it.
> + int err, i;
> +
> + /* 88e6390x-88e6190x errata 3.14:
> + * After chip reset, SERDES reconfiguration or SERDES core
> + * Software Reset, the SERDES lanes may not be properly aligned
> + * resulting in CRC errors
> + */
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(lanes); i++) {
> + err = mv88e6390_serdes_write(chip, lanes[i],
> + MDIO_MMD_PHYXS,
> + 0xf054, 0x400C);
Does Marvell give this register a name? If so, please add a #define.
Are the bits in the register documented?
> + if (!err && up) {
> + if (chip->info->prod_num == MV88E6XXX_PORT_SWITCH_ID_PROD_6390X ||
> + chip->info->prod_num == MV88E6XXX_PORT_SWITCH_ID_PROD_6190X)
6191X? 6193X?
Please sort these into numerical order.
Andrew
---
pw-bot: cr
>> +static int mv88e6390x_serdes_erratum_3_14(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip)
>> +{
>> + int lanes[] = { MV88E6390_PORT9_LANE0, MV88E6390_PORT9_LANE1,
>> + MV88E6390_PORT9_LANE2, MV88E6390_PORT9_LANE3,
>> + MV88E6390_PORT10_LANE0, MV88E6390_PORT10_LANE1,
>> + MV88E6390_PORT10_LANE2, MV88E6390_PORT10_LANE3 };
>Please make this const. Otherwise you end up with two copies of it.
will do.
>> + int err, i;
>> +
>> + /* 88e6390x-88e6190x errata 3.14:
>> + * After chip reset, SERDES reconfiguration or SERDES core
>> + * Software Reset, the SERDES lanes may not be properly aligned
>> + * resulting in CRC errors
>> + */
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(lanes); i++) {
>> + err = mv88e6390_serdes_write(chip, lanes[i],
>> + MDIO_MMD_PHYXS,
>> + 0xf054, 0x400C);
>Does Marvell give this register a name? If so, please add a #define.
>Are the bits in the register documented?
Unfortunately, no. This is one of those undocumented registers. I will
make a note of it in the commit message.
>> + if (!err && up) {
>> + if (chip->info->prod_num == MV88E6XXX_PORT_SWITCH_ID_PROD_6390X ||
>> + chip->info->prod_num == MV88E6XXX_PORT_SWITCH_ID_PROD_6190X)
>6191X? 6193X?
Errata I have available refers only to 6190x and 6390x. Not sure about other devices.
>Please sort these into numerical order.
will do.
> >Does Marvell give this register a name? If so, please add a #define.
> >Are the bits in the register documented?
>
> Unfortunately, no. This is one of those undocumented registers. I will
> make a note of it in the commit message.
Undocumented magic is typical for Marvell Erratas.
>
> >> + if (!err && up) {
> >> + if (chip->info->prod_num == MV88E6XXX_PORT_SWITCH_ID_PROD_6390X ||
> >> + chip->info->prod_num == MV88E6XXX_PORT_SWITCH_ID_PROD_6190X)
>
> >6191X? 6193X?
>
> Errata I have available refers only to 6190x and 6390x. Not sure about other devices.
Please mention this in the commit message.
Thanks
Andrew
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.