drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
There may be a potential null pointer risk if offset value is
less than 0 when doing memcmp in btmtk_process_coredump().
Checking offset is valid before doing memcmp.
Signed-off-by: Chris Lu <chris.lu@mediatek.com>
Co-developed-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>
---
v2: fix typo
v3: fix bot checking error
---
drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c | 16 ++++++++--------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c
index 786f775196ae..0f290430ae0e 100644
--- a/drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c
+++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c
@@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(btmtk_register_coredump);
int btmtk_process_coredump(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
struct btmediatek_data *data = hci_get_priv(hdev);
- int err;
+ int err, offset;
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEV_COREDUMP))
return 0;
@@ -392,15 +392,15 @@ int btmtk_process_coredump(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
if (err < 0)
break;
data->cd_info.cnt++;
+ offset = skb->len - sizeof(MTK_COREDUMP_END);
/* Mediatek coredump data would be more than MTK_COREDUMP_NUM */
- if (data->cd_info.cnt > MTK_COREDUMP_NUM &&
- skb->len > sizeof(MTK_COREDUMP_END) &&
- !memcmp((char *)&skb->data[skb->len - sizeof(MTK_COREDUMP_END)],
- MTK_COREDUMP_END, sizeof(MTK_COREDUMP_END) - 1)) {
- bt_dev_info(hdev, "Mediatek coredump end");
- hci_devcd_complete(hdev);
- }
+ if (data->cd_info.cnt > MTK_COREDUMP_NUM && offset > 0)
+ if (!memcmp((char *)&skb->data[offset], MTK_COREDUMP_END,
+ sizeof(MTK_COREDUMP_END) - 1)) {
+ bt_dev_info(hdev, "Mediatek coredump end");
+ hci_devcd_complete(hdev);
+ }
break;
}
--
2.18.0
Dear Chris,
Am 12.07.23 um 07:18 schrieb Chris Lu:
> There may be a potential null pointer risk if offset value is
> less than 0 when doing memcmp in btmtk_process_coredump().
> Checking offset is valid before doing memcmp.
Use imperative mood: Check offset …
> Signed-off-by: Chris Lu <chris.lu@mediatek.com>
> Co-developed-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>
> ---
> v2: fix typo
> v3: fix bot checking error
> ---
> drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c
> index 786f775196ae..0f290430ae0e 100644
> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c
> @@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(btmtk_register_coredump);
> int btmtk_process_coredump(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> struct btmediatek_data *data = hci_get_priv(hdev);
> - int err;
> + int err, offset;
>
> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEV_COREDUMP))
> return 0;
> @@ -392,15 +392,15 @@ int btmtk_process_coredump(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
> if (err < 0)
> break;
> data->cd_info.cnt++;
> + offset = skb->len - sizeof(MTK_COREDUMP_END);
For `sizeof()` shouldn’t you use `size_t`? But that is unsigned of
course. Maybe ssize_t then?
>
> /* Mediatek coredump data would be more than MTK_COREDUMP_NUM */
> - if (data->cd_info.cnt > MTK_COREDUMP_NUM &&
> - skb->len > sizeof(MTK_COREDUMP_END) &&
> - !memcmp((char *)&skb->data[skb->len - sizeof(MTK_COREDUMP_END)],
> - MTK_COREDUMP_END, sizeof(MTK_COREDUMP_END) - 1)) {
> - bt_dev_info(hdev, "Mediatek coredump end");
> - hci_devcd_complete(hdev);
> - }
> + if (data->cd_info.cnt > MTK_COREDUMP_NUM && offset > 0)
Why not keep it like before, and just add the condition `skb->len <
sizeof(MTK_COREDUMP_END)`? The compiler is probably going to optimize so
the value is not calculated twice.
Kind regards,
Paul
> + if (!memcmp((char *)&skb->data[offset], MTK_COREDUMP_END,
> + sizeof(MTK_COREDUMP_END) - 1)) {
> + bt_dev_info(hdev, "Mediatek coredump end");
> + hci_devcd_complete(hdev);
> + }
>
> break;
> }
On Wed, 2023-07-12 at 08:11 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
>
> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> you have verified the sender or the content.
> Dear Chris,
>
Dear Paul,
Thanks for your review and feedback to Mediatek's Bluetooth driver
code.
>
> Am 12.07.23 um 07:18 schrieb Chris Lu:
> > There may be a potential null pointer risk if offset value is
> > less than 0 when doing memcmp in btmtk_process_coredump().
> > Checking offset is valid before doing memcmp.
>
> Use imperative mood: Check offset …
>
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Lu <chris.lu@mediatek.com>
> > Co-developed-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> > v2: fix typo
> > v3: fix bot checking error
> > ---
> > drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c
> > index 786f775196ae..0f290430ae0e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c
> > +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c
> > @@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(btmtk_register_coredump);
> > int btmtk_process_coredump(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff
> *skb)
> > {
> > struct btmediatek_data *data = hci_get_priv(hdev);
> > -int err;
> > +int err, offset;
> >
> > if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEV_COREDUMP))
> > return 0;
> > @@ -392,15 +392,15 @@ int btmtk_process_coredump(struct hci_dev
> *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
> > if (err < 0)
> > break;
> > data->cd_info.cnt++;
> > +offset = skb->len - sizeof(MTK_COREDUMP_END);
>
> For `sizeof()` shouldn’t you use `size_t`? But that is unsigned of
> course. Maybe ssize_t then?
>
yes, it's better to use ssize_t or size_t, I'll change declaratins of
offset from int to ssize_t.
> >
> > /* Mediatek coredump data would be more than MTK_COREDUMP_NUM */
> > -if (data->cd_info.cnt > MTK_COREDUMP_NUM &&
> > - skb->len > sizeof(MTK_COREDUMP_END) &&
> > - !memcmp((char *)&skb->data[skb->len -
> sizeof(MTK_COREDUMP_END)],
> > - MTK_COREDUMP_END, sizeof(MTK_COREDUMP_END) - 1)) {
> > -bt_dev_info(hdev, "Mediatek coredump end");
> > -hci_devcd_complete(hdev);
> > -}
> > +if (data->cd_info.cnt > MTK_COREDUMP_NUM && offset > 0)
>
> Why not keep it like before, and just add the condition `skb->len <
> sizeof(MTK_COREDUMP_END)`? The compiler is probably going to optimize
> so
> the value is not calculated twice.
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Paul
>
>
The reason why I send this patch is when I backport devcoredump feature
to specific project with older kernel version, the compiler might not
so optimized that it would cause kernel panic when run into memcmp.
As a result, make sure `skb->len > sizeof(MTK_COREDUMP_END) ` before
doing memcmp part can avoid null pointer issue.
Besides, only in condition 'data->cd_info.cnt > MTK_COREDUMP_NUM &&
offset > 0' need to do memcmp to check the end of coredump. Driver do
noting with condition `skb->len < sizeof(MTK_COREDUMP_END) ` that
additional condiction is not really necessary.
> > +if (!memcmp((char *)&skb->data[offset], MTK_COREDUMP_END,
> > + sizeof(MTK_COREDUMP_END) - 1)) {
> > +bt_dev_info(hdev, "Mediatek coredump end");
> > +hci_devcd_complete(hdev);
> > +}
> >
> > break;
> > }
Dear Chris,
Am 12.07.23 um 10:53 schrieb Chris Lu (陸稚泓):
> On Wed, 2023-07-12 at 08:11 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
>>
>> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
>> you have verified the sender or the content.
(It’d be nice if you removed such (automatically added) phrases from
your reply.)
> Thanks for your review and feedback to Mediatek's Bluetooth driver
> code.
Thank you for your reply.
>> Am 12.07.23 um 07:18 schrieb Chris Lu:
>>> There may be a potential null pointer risk if offset value is
>>> less than 0 when doing memcmp in btmtk_process_coredump().
>>> Checking offset is valid before doing memcmp.
>>
>> Use imperative mood: Check offset …
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chris Lu <chris.lu@mediatek.com>
>>> Co-developed-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>
>>> ---
>>> v2: fix typo
>>> v3: fix bot checking error
>>> ---
>>> drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c | 16 ++++++++--------
>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c
>>> index 786f775196ae..0f290430ae0e 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c
>>> @@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(btmtk_register_coredump);
>>> int btmtk_process_coredump(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
>>> {
>>> struct btmediatek_data *data = hci_get_priv(hdev);
>>> -int err;
>>> +int err, offset;
>>>
>>> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEV_COREDUMP))
>>> return 0;
>>> @@ -392,15 +392,15 @@ int btmtk_process_coredump(struct hci_dev
>> *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
>>> if (err < 0)
>>> break;
>>> data->cd_info.cnt++;
>>> +offset = skb->len - sizeof(MTK_COREDUMP_END);
>>
>> For `sizeof()` shouldn’t you use `size_t`? But that is unsigned of
>> course. Maybe ssize_t then?
>
> yes, it's better to use ssize_t or size_t, I'll change declaratins of
> offset from int to ssize_t.
>
>>>
>>> /* Mediatek coredump data would be more than MTK_COREDUMP_NUM */
>>> -if (data->cd_info.cnt > MTK_COREDUMP_NUM &&
>>> - skb->len > sizeof(MTK_COREDUMP_END) &&
>>> - !memcmp((char *)&skb->data[skb->len - sizeof(MTK_COREDUMP_END)],
>>> - MTK_COREDUMP_END, sizeof(MTK_COREDUMP_END) - 1)) {
>>> -bt_dev_info(hdev, "Mediatek coredump end");
>>> -hci_devcd_complete(hdev);
>>> -}
>>> +if (data->cd_info.cnt > MTK_COREDUMP_NUM && offset > 0)
>>
>> Why not keep it like before, and just add the condition `skb->len <
>> sizeof(MTK_COREDUMP_END)`? The compiler is probably going to optimize
>> so the value is not calculated twice.
> The reason why I send this patch is when I backport devcoredump feature
> to specific project with older kernel version, the compiler might not
> so optimized that it would cause kernel panic when run into memcmp.
> As a result, make sure `skb->len > sizeof(MTK_COREDUMP_END) ` before
> doing memcmp part can avoid null pointer issue.
> Besides, only in condition 'data->cd_info.cnt > MTK_COREDUMP_NUM &&
> offset > 0' need to do memcmp to check the end of coredump. Driver do
> noting with condition `skb->len < sizeof(MTK_COREDUMP_END) ` that
> additional condiction is not really necessary.
Just to avoid misunderstandings, my point, to add the comparison and get
rid of the variable `offset`.
Kind regards,
Paul
>>> +if (!memcmp((char *)&skb->data[offset], MTK_COREDUMP_END,
>>> + sizeof(MTK_COREDUMP_END) - 1)) {
>>> +bt_dev_info(hdev, "Mediatek coredump end");
>>> +hci_devcd_complete(hdev);
>>> +}
>>>
>>> break;
>>> }
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.