[PATCH 0/3] net: dsa: SERDES support for mv88e632x family

M. Haener posted 3 patches 2 years, 7 months ago
drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c   |  58 +++++++++
drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.h   |   4 +
drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/serdes.c | 187 ++++++++++++++++++-----------
drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/serdes.h |  35 ++++++
4 files changed, 214 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
[PATCH 0/3] net: dsa: SERDES support for mv88e632x family
Posted by M. Haener 2 years, 7 months ago
From: Michael Haener <michael.haener@siemens.com>

This patch series brings SERDES support for the mv88e632x family.

Michael Haener (3):
  net: dsa: mv88e632x: Refactor serdes read
  net: dsa: mv88e632x: Refactor serdes write
  net: dsa: mv88e632x: Add SERDES ops

 drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c   |  58 +++++++++
 drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.h   |   4 +
 drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/serdes.c | 187 ++++++++++++++++++-----------
 drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/serdes.h |  35 ++++++
 4 files changed, 214 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)

-- 
2.41.0
Re: [PATCH 0/3] net: dsa: SERDES support for mv88e632x family
Posted by Andrew Lunn 2 years, 7 months ago
On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 05:26:06PM +0200, M. Haener wrote:
> From: Michael Haener <michael.haener@siemens.com>
> 
> This patch series brings SERDES support for the mv88e632x family.

Please take a look at Russell Kings series:

https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg914908.html

It would be good if you could build on top of that, which we should be
merging soon.

   Andrew
Re: [PATCH 0/3] net: dsa: SERDES support for mv88e632x family
Posted by Haener, Michael 2 years, 7 months ago
Thanks for your message. I will adjust the patch accordingly.

Michael

On Mon, 2023-07-03 at 17:38 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 05:26:06PM +0200, M. Haener wrote:
> > From: Michael Haener <michael.haener@siemens.com>
> >
> > This patch series brings SERDES support for the mv88e632x family.
>
> Please take a look at Russell Kings series:
>
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg914908.html
>
> It would be good if you could build on top of that, which we should
> be
> merging soon.
>
>    Andrew