[PATCH] watchdog: s3c2410: Fix potential deadlock on &wdt->lock

Chengfeng Ye posted 1 patch 2 years, 7 months ago
drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c | 10 ++++++----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
[PATCH] watchdog: s3c2410: Fix potential deadlock on &wdt->lock
Posted by Chengfeng Ye 2 years, 7 months ago
As &wdt->lock is acquired by hard irq s3c2410wdt_irq(),
other acquisition of the same lock under process context should
disable irq, otherwise deadlock could happen if the
irq preempt the execution while the lock is held in process context
on the same CPU.

  [Interrupt]: s3c2410wdt_irq
    -->/root/linux/drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c:547
    -->/root/linux/drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c:383
    -->spin_lock(&wdt->lock);

  [Process Context]: s3c2410wdt_suspend
    -->/root/linux/drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c:764
    -->/root/linux/drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c:403
    -->spin_lock(&wdt->lock);

  [Process Context]: s3c2410wdt_probe
    -->/root/linux/drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c:710
    -->/root/linux/drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c:415
    -->spin_lock(&wdt->lock);

This flaw was found by an experimental static analysis tool I am
developing for irq-related deadlock, which reported the above
warning when analyzing the linux kernel 6.4-rc7 release.

The tentative patch fix the potential deadlock by spin_lock_irqsave().

Signed-off-by: Chengfeng Ye <dg573847474@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c
index 95416a9bdd4b..2dfc0d6a3004 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c
@@ -399,10 +399,11 @@ static void __s3c2410wdt_stop(struct s3c2410_wdt *wdt)
 static int s3c2410wdt_stop(struct watchdog_device *wdd)
 {
 	struct s3c2410_wdt *wdt = watchdog_get_drvdata(wdd);
+	unsigned long flags;
 
-	spin_lock(&wdt->lock);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&wdt->lock, flags);
 	__s3c2410wdt_stop(wdt);
-	spin_unlock(&wdt->lock);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&wdt->lock, flags);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -411,8 +412,9 @@ static int s3c2410wdt_start(struct watchdog_device *wdd)
 {
 	unsigned long wtcon;
 	struct s3c2410_wdt *wdt = watchdog_get_drvdata(wdd);
+	unsigned long flags;
 
-	spin_lock(&wdt->lock);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&wdt->lock, flags);
 
 	__s3c2410wdt_stop(wdt);
 
@@ -433,7 +435,7 @@ static int s3c2410wdt_start(struct watchdog_device *wdd)
 	writel(wdt->count, wdt->reg_base + S3C2410_WTDAT);
 	writel(wdt->count, wdt->reg_base + S3C2410_WTCNT);
 	writel(wtcon, wdt->reg_base + S3C2410_WTCON);
-	spin_unlock(&wdt->lock);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&wdt->lock, flags);
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.17.1
Re: [PATCH] watchdog: s3c2410: Fix potential deadlock on &wdt->lock
Posted by Krzysztof Kozlowski 2 years, 7 months ago
On 28/06/2023 18:47, Chengfeng Ye wrote:
> As &wdt->lock is acquired by hard irq s3c2410wdt_irq(),
> other acquisition of the same lock under process context should
> disable irq, otherwise deadlock could happen if the
> irq preempt the execution while the lock is held in process context
> on the same CPU.
> 
>   [Interrupt]: s3c2410wdt_irq
>     -->/root/linux/drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c:547
>     -->/root/linux/drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c:383
>     -->spin_lock(&wdt->lock);

This interrupt is a threaded interrupt. Therefore the
s3c2410wdt_keepalive() will be called again from process thread. Are you
sure there is deadlock?

Anyway, please also strip unrelated paths and rather use function names,
not references to lines, because these might be not accurate.


Best regards,
Krzysztof