The RPMCC node should be fed a reference to the XO fixed clock.
Do so.

Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi
index f0e943ff0046..171f2e21d80a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi
@@ -334,6 +334,8 @@ rpm_requests: rpm-requests {
 
 			rpmcc: clock-controller {
 				compatible = "qcom,rpmcc-msm8998", "qcom,rpmcc";
+				clocks = <&xo>;
+				clock-names = "xo";
 				#clock-cells = <1>;
 			};
 

---
base-commit: 53cdf865f90ba922a854c65ed05b519f9d728424
change-id: 20230627-topic-98_rpmcc-2eb2d9e2080f

Best regards,
-- 
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>

On Tue, 27 Jun 2023 19:28:52 +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> The RPMCC node should be fed a reference to the XO fixed clock.
> Do so.
> 
> 

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998: Provide XO to RPMCC
      commit: ddf66e4b16744b96db4bd1ddee9d19b5a834f94f

Best regards,
-- 
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>

On 6/27/2023 11:28 AM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> The RPMCC node should be fed a reference to the XO fixed clock.
> Do so.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>

Reviewed-by: Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@quicinc.com>