On Wed, 2023-06-21 at 16:58 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 1:01 AM Srinivas Pandruvada
> <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Add support for Meteor Lake workload hints. Before adding this
> > support,
> > some reorganization and clean up is required.
> > First four changes are for clean up and to reorganize code to add
> > support for workload hint. The last patch adds a test program as
> > part
> > of self tests.
> >
> > Srinivas Pandruvada (7):
> > thermal: int340x: processor_thermal: Move mailbox code to common
> > module
> > thermal: int340x: processor_thermal: Add interrupt configuration
> > thermal: int340x: processor_thermal: Use non MSI interrupts
> > thermal/drivers/int340x: Remove PROC_THERMAL_FEATURE_WLT_REQ for
> > Meteor Lake
> > thermal: int340x: processor_thermal: Add workload type hint
> > thermal/drivers/int340x: Support workload hint interrupts
> > selftests/thermel/intel: Add test to read workload hint
> >
> > .../driver-api/thermal/intel_dptf.rst | 38 +++
> > .../thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/Makefile | 2 +
> > .../processor_thermal_device.c | 17 +-
> > .../processor_thermal_device.h | 21 +-
> > .../processor_thermal_device_pci.c | 76 ++++--
> > .../processor_thermal_device_pci_legacy.c | 3 +-
> > .../int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_mbox.c | 179 ++++---------
> > .../processor_thermal_wlt_hint.c | 239
> > ++++++++++++++++++
> > .../processor_thermal_wlt_req.c | 137 ++++++++++
> > .../testing/selftests/thermal/intel/Makefile | 16 ++
> > .../thermal/intel/workload_hint_test.c | 114 +++++++++
> > 11 files changed, 680 insertions(+), 162 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644
> > drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_wlt_hint.c
> > create mode 100644
> > drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_wlt_req.c
> > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/thermal/intel/Makefile
> > create mode 100644
> > tools/testing/selftests/thermal/intel/workload_hint_test.c
> >
> > --
>
> Because of the timing of the first posting, I'm going to treat this
> series as 6.6 material.
That is fine. Just review is important, so that it can be back ported
to Chrome kernel.
Thanks,
Srinivas