[PATCH] workqueue: format pr_warn exceeds line length in wq_numa_init

tiozhang posted 1 patch 2 years, 7 months ago
kernel/workqueue.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
[PATCH] workqueue: format pr_warn exceeds line length in wq_numa_init
Posted by tiozhang 2 years, 7 months ago
Format this long line which would potentially let checkpatch complain
"WARNING: line length of 103 exceeds 100 columns".

Signed-off-by: tiozhang <tiozhang@didiglobal.com>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 47e7b29df5fe..4375c7190353 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -5959,7 +5959,8 @@ static void __init wq_numa_init(void)
 
 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
 		if (WARN_ON(cpu_to_node(cpu) == NUMA_NO_NODE)) {
-			pr_warn("workqueue: NUMA node mapping not available for cpu%d, disabling NUMA support\n", cpu);
+			pr_warn("workqueue: NUMA node mapping not available for cpu%d, disabling NUMA support\n",
+				cpu);
 			return;
 		}
 	}
-- 
2.17.1
Re: [PATCH] workqueue: format pr_warn exceeds line length in wq_numa_init
Posted by Lai Jiangshan 2 years, 7 months ago
On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 3:00 PM tiozhang <tiozhang@didiglobal.com> wrote:
>
> Format this long line which would potentially let checkpatch complain
> "WARNING: line length of 103 exceeds 100 columns".

Hello

This patch hurts the readability actually. A few extra characters exceeding
is Okay for me.

Thanks
Lai

>
> Signed-off-by: tiozhang <tiozhang@didiglobal.com>
> ---
>  kernel/workqueue.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
> index 47e7b29df5fe..4375c7190353 100644
> --- a/kernel/workqueue.c
> +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
> @@ -5959,7 +5959,8 @@ static void __init wq_numa_init(void)
>
>         for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>                 if (WARN_ON(cpu_to_node(cpu) == NUMA_NO_NODE)) {
> -                       pr_warn("workqueue: NUMA node mapping not available for cpu%d, disabling NUMA support\n", cpu);
> +                       pr_warn("workqueue: NUMA node mapping not available for cpu%d, disabling NUMA support\n",
> +                               cpu);
>                         return;
>                 }
>         }
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Re: [PATCH] workqueue: format pr_warn exceeds line length in wq_numa_init
Posted by Joe Perches 2 years, 7 months ago
On Sun, 2023-06-18 at 09:19 +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 3:00 PM tiozhang <tiozhang@didiglobal.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Format this long line which would potentially let checkpatch complain
> > "WARNING: line length of 103 exceeds 100 columns".
[]
> This patch hurts the readability actually. A few extra characters exceeding
> is Okay for me.
[]
> > diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
[]
> > @@ -5959,7 +5959,8 @@ static void __init wq_numa_init(void)
> > 
> >         for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> >                 if (WARN_ON(cpu_to_node(cpu) == NUMA_NO_NODE)) {
> > -                       pr_warn("workqueue: NUMA node mapping not available for cpu%d, disabling NUMA support\n", cpu);
> > +                       pr_warn("workqueue: NUMA node mapping not available for cpu%d, disabling NUMA support\n",
> > +                               cpu);

What _might_ work reasonably well is to add

#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt

before any include and remove "workqueue: " from
all pr_<foo> uses.

Re: [PATCH] workqueue: format pr_warn exceeds line length in wq_numa_init
Posted by 张元瀚 Tio Zhang 2 years, 7 months ago
Hi Joe, 

Thanks for your advice.

IMHO, in workqueue, some prints start with "workqueue %s:" which means the workqueue_struct, not the workqueue module. Since we could not remove those, starting with "workqueue: workqueue %s" might be confusing sometimes I guess.

So maybe
#define pr_fmt(fmt) "WORKQUEUE: " fmt 
might work?



在 2023/6/19 10:41,“Joe Perches”<joe@perches.com <mailto:joe@perches.com> <mailto:joe@perches.com <mailto:joe@perches.com>>> 写入:




On Sun, 2023-06-18 at 09:19 +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 3:00 PM tiozhang <tiozhang@didiglobal.com <mailto:tiozhang@didiglobal.com> <mailto:tiozhang@didiglobal.com <mailto:tiozhang@didiglobal.com>>> wrote:
> > 
> > Format this long line which would potentially let checkpatch complain
> > "WARNING: line length of 103 exceeds 100 columns".
[]
> This patch hurts the readability actually. A few extra characters exceeding
> is Okay for me.
[]
> > diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
[]
> > @@ -5959,7 +5959,8 @@ static void __init wq_numa_init(void)
> > 
> > for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> > if (WARN_ON(cpu_to_node(cpu) == NUMA_NO_NODE)) {
> > - pr_warn("workqueue: NUMA node mapping not available for cpu%d, disabling NUMA support\n", cpu);
> > + pr_warn("workqueue: NUMA node mapping not available for cpu%d, disabling NUMA support\n",
> > + cpu);




What _might_ work reasonably well is to add




#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt




before any include and remove "workqueue: " from
all pr_<foo> uses.