[v2] lib/test_bpf: Call page_address() on page acquired with GFP_KERNEL flag

[PATCH v2] lib/test_bpf: Call page_address() on page acquired with GFP_KERNEL flag

Posted by Sumitra Sharma 2 years, 7 months ago

generate_test_data() acquires a page with alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL). Pages
allocated with GFP_KERNEL cannot come from Highmem. This is why
there is no need to call kmap() on them.

Therefore, use a plain page_address() on that page.

Suggested-by: Fabio M. De Francesco <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sumitra Sharma <sumitraartsy@gmail.com>
---

Changes in v2: 
	- Remove the kmap() call and call page_address() instead.
	- Change the commit subject and message.

 lib/test_bpf.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c
index ade9ac672adb..70fcd0bcf14b 100644
--- a/lib/test_bpf.c
+++ b/lib/test_bpf.c
@@ -14388,11 +14388,10 @@ static void *generate_test_data(struct bpf_test *test, int sub)
 		if (!page)
 			goto err_kfree_skb;
 
-		ptr = kmap(page);
+		ptr = page_address(page);
 		if (!ptr)
 			goto err_free_page;
 		memcpy(ptr, test->frag_data, MAX_DATA);
-		kunmap(page);
 		skb_add_rx_frag(skb, 0, page, 0, MAX_DATA, MAX_DATA);
 	}
 
-- 
2.25.1

Re: [PATCH v2] lib/test_bpf: Call page_address() on page acquired with GFP_KERNEL flag

Posted by Fabio M. De Francesco 2 years, 7 months ago

On martedì 13 giugno 2023 09:17:56 CEST Sumitra Sharma wrote:
> generate_test_data() acquires a page with alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL). Pages
> allocated with GFP_KERNEL cannot come from Highmem. This is why
> there is no need to call kmap() on them.
> 
> Therefore, use a plain page_address() on that page.
> 
> Suggested-by: Fabio M. De Francesco <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sumitra Sharma <sumitraartsy@gmail.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes in v2:
> 	- Remove the kmap() call and call page_address() instead.

NIT: Give credit to whom asked you for this removal and explain why the 
mapping is not required.

> 	- Change the commit subject and message.
> 
>  lib/test_bpf.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c
> index ade9ac672adb..70fcd0bcf14b 100644
> --- a/lib/test_bpf.c
> +++ b/lib/test_bpf.c
> @@ -14388,11 +14388,10 @@ static void *generate_test_data(struct bpf_test
> *test, int sub) if (!page)
>  			goto err_kfree_skb;
> 
> -		ptr = kmap(page);
> +		ptr = page_address(page);
>  		if (!ptr)
>  			goto err_free_page;

What is the reason of this test? Could "ptr" ever be NULL? What is the code 
checking just few lines above this latter test?

Please, take a deeper look at this function as a whole.

Fabio

>  		memcpy(ptr, test->frag_data, MAX_DATA);
> -		kunmap(page);
>  		skb_add_rx_frag(skb, 0, page, 0, MAX_DATA, MAX_DATA);
>  	}
> 
> --
> 2.25.1

Re: [PATCH v2] lib/test_bpf: Call page_address() on page acquired with GFP_KERNEL flag

Posted by Sumitra Sharma 2 years, 7 months ago

On Sun, Jun 18, 2023 at 07:07:00AM +0200, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> On martedì 13 giugno 2023 09:17:56 CEST Sumitra Sharma wrote:
> > generate_test_data() acquires a page with alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL). Pages
> > allocated with GFP_KERNEL cannot come from Highmem. This is why
> > there is no need to call kmap() on them.
> > 
> > Therefore, use a plain page_address() on that page.
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Fabio M. De Francesco <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Sumitra Sharma <sumitraartsy@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > Changes in v2:
> > 	- Remove the kmap() call and call page_address() instead.
> 
> NIT: Give credit to whom asked you for this removal and explain why the 
> mapping is not required.

> 
> > 	- Change the commit subject and message.
> > 
> >  lib/test_bpf.c | 3 +--
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c
> > index ade9ac672adb..70fcd0bcf14b 100644
> > --- a/lib/test_bpf.c
> > +++ b/lib/test_bpf.c
> > @@ -14388,11 +14388,10 @@ static void *generate_test_data(struct bpf_test
> > *test, int sub) if (!page)
> >  			goto err_kfree_skb;
> > 
> > -		ptr = kmap(page);
> > +		ptr = page_address(page);
> >  		if (!ptr)
> >  			goto err_free_page;
> 
> What is the reason of this test? Could "ptr" ever be NULL? What is the code 
> checking just few lines above this latter test?
> 


The code is allocating a page using alloc_page() with the GFP_KERNEL flag to 
obtain a kernel page frame. The checks if (!page) and if (!ptr) are verifying 
if the page allocation or the mapping operation were successful. 

If the pages obtained through page_address() are not from the highmem zone, 
the page_address() function will always return a valid kernel virtual address 
and will not return NULL. Hence, the check !ptr can be ignored while the !page
must remain.

I will be working on the v2 patch.

I will also add the credits and add new lines to commit message
explaining why the mapping is not required.

Thank you for the help.

Thanks & regards
Sumitra

> Please, take a deeper look at this function as a whole.
> 
> Fabio
> 
> >  		memcpy(ptr, test->frag_data, MAX_DATA);
> > -		kunmap(page);
> >  		skb_add_rx_frag(skb, 0, page, 0, MAX_DATA, MAX_DATA);
> >  	}
> > 
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> 
> 
> 
>