From: Mao Zhu <zhumao001@208suo.com>

Delete duplicated word in comment.

Signed-off-by: Mao Zhu <zhumao001@208suo.com>
---
 include/linux/fs.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index df6c1817906f..aa870b77cc2b 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -2675,7 +2675,7 @@ extern void evict_inodes(struct super_block *sb);
 void dump_mapping(const struct address_space *);
 
 /*
- * Userspace may rely on the the inode number being non-zero. For example, glibc
+ * Userspace may rely on the inode number being non-zero. For example, glibc
  * simply ignores files with zero i_ino in unlink() and other places.
  *
  * As an additional complication, if userspace was compiled with
-- 
2.35.1

On Sun, 11 Jun 2023 08:33:14 -0400, Shaomin Deng wrote:
> Delete duplicated word in comment.
> 
>

Missing sender SOB added.

---

Applied to the vfs.misc branch of the vfs/vfs.git tree.
Patches in the vfs.misc branch should appear in linux-next soon.

Please report any outstanding bugs that were missed during review in a
new review to the original patch series allowing us to drop it.

It's encouraged to provide Acked-bys and Reviewed-bys even though the
patch has now been applied. If possible patch trailers will be updated.

tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs.git
branch: vfs.misc

[1/1] fs: Fix comment typo
      https://git.kernel.org/vfs/vfs/c/dce5a4da3cf5

On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 08:33:14AM -0400, Shaomin Deng wrote:
> From: Mao Zhu <zhumao001@208suo.com>
> 
> Delete duplicated word in comment.

On what function?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Mao Zhu <zhumao001@208suo.com>

You're carrying someone else's patch, so besides SoB from original
author, you need to also have your own SoB.

> ---
>  include/linux/fs.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> index df6c1817906f..aa870b77cc2b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -2675,7 +2675,7 @@ extern void evict_inodes(struct super_block *sb);
>  void dump_mapping(const struct address_space *);
>  
>  /*
> - * Userspace may rely on the the inode number being non-zero. For example, glibc
> + * Userspace may rely on the inode number being non-zero. For example, glibc
>   * simply ignores files with zero i_ino in unlink() and other places.
>   *
>   * As an additional complication, if userspace was compiled with

I don't see the function name in above diff (dump_mapping() isn't the
function I mean). Regardless, the fix LGTM.

@cdjrlc.com developers: I'm really, really fed up with you ignoring
review comments. It seems like you have issues on your mail setup. Fix
your mailer! Until then, I just say NAK.

Thanks.

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> writes:

> On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 08:33:14AM -0400, Shaomin Deng wrote:
>> From: Mao Zhu <zhumao001@208suo.com>
>> 
>> Delete duplicated word in comment.
>
> On what function?

Bagas, do I *really* have to ask you, yet again, to stop nitpicking our
contributors into the ground?  It appears I do.  So:

Bagas, *stop* this.  It's a typo patch removing an extraneous word.  The
changelog is fine.  We absolutely do not need you playing changelog cop
and harassing contributors over this kind of thing.

>> Signed-off-by: Mao Zhu <zhumao001@208suo.com>
>
> You're carrying someone else's patch, so besides SoB from original
> author, you need to also have your own SoB.

This, instead, is a valid problem that needs to be fixed.

Thanks,

jon

On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 01:50:34PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 08:33:14AM -0400, Shaomin Deng wrote:
> >> From: Mao Zhu <zhumao001@208suo.com>
> >> 
> >> Delete duplicated word in comment.
> >
> > On what function?
> 
> Bagas, do I *really* have to ask you, yet again, to stop nitpicking our
> contributors into the ground?  It appears I do.  So:
> 
> Bagas, *stop* this.  It's a typo patch removing an extraneous word.  The
> changelog is fine.  We absolutely do not need you playing changelog cop
> and harassing contributors over this kind of thing.

100% agreed.

> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Mao Zhu <zhumao001@208suo.com>
> >
> > You're carrying someone else's patch, so besides SoB from original
> > author, you need to also have your own SoB.
> 
> This, instead, is a valid problem that needs to be fixed.

Patch picked up and missing sender SOB added.

On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 08:34:53AM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 01:50:34PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> > Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> writes:
> > 
> > > On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 08:33:14AM -0400, Shaomin Deng wrote:
> > >> From: Mao Zhu <zhumao001@208suo.com>
> > >> 
> > >> Delete duplicated word in comment.
> > >
> > > On what function?
> > 
> > Bagas, do I *really* have to ask you, yet again, to stop nitpicking our
> > contributors into the ground?  It appears I do.  So:
> > 
> > Bagas, *stop* this.  It's a typo patch removing an extraneous word.  The
> > changelog is fine.  We absolutely do not need you playing changelog cop
> > and harassing contributors over this kind of thing.
> 
> 100% agreed.
> 
> > 
> > >> Signed-off-by: Mao Zhu <zhumao001@208suo.com>
> > >
> > > You're carrying someone else's patch, so besides SoB from original
> > > author, you need to also have your own SoB.
> > 
> > This, instead, is a valid problem that needs to be fixed.
> 
> Patch picked up and missing sender SOB added.

I've been informed that I may not be allowed to do that.
So dropping the sender SOB for now following willy's argument.

On 6/12/23 15:34, Christian Brauner wrote:
>> Patch picked up and missing sender SOB added.
> 
> I've been informed that I may not be allowed to do that.
> So dropping the sender SOB for now following willy's argument.

OK, thanks for resolving!

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 01:50:34PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 08:33:14AM -0400, Shaomin Deng wrote:
> >> From: Mao Zhu <zhumao001@208suo.com>
> >> 
> >> Delete duplicated word in comment.
> >
> > On what function?
> 
> Bagas, do I *really* have to ask you, yet again, to stop nitpicking our
> contributors into the ground?  It appears I do.  So:
> 
> Bagas, *stop* this.  It's a typo patch removing an extraneous word.  The
> changelog is fine.  We absolutely do not need you playing changelog cop
> and harassing contributors over this kind of thing.

OK, thanks for reminding me again.

At the time of reviewing, I had bad feeling that @cdjrlc.com people will
ignore review comments (I betted due to mail setup problem that prevents
them from properly repling to mailing lists, which is unfortunate). I
was nitpicking because the diff context doesn't look clear to me (what
function name?).

> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Mao Zhu <zhumao001@208suo.com>
> >
> > You're carrying someone else's patch, so besides SoB from original
> > author, you need to also have your own SoB.
> 
> This, instead, is a valid problem that needs to be fixed.

OK.

Sorry for my inconvenience.

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

On 6/12/23 08:41, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 01:50:34PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>> Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 08:33:14AM -0400, Shaomin Deng wrote:
>>>> From: Mao Zhu <zhumao001@208suo.com>
>>>>
>>>> Delete duplicated word in comment.
>>>
>>> On what function?
>>
>> Bagas, do I *really* have to ask you, yet again, to stop nitpicking our
>> contributors into the ground?  It appears I do.  So:
>>
>> Bagas, *stop* this.  It's a typo patch removing an extraneous word.  The
>> changelog is fine.  We absolutely do not need you playing changelog cop
>> and harassing contributors over this kind of thing.
> 
> OK, thanks for reminding me again.
> 
> At the time of reviewing, I had bad feeling that @cdjrlc.com people will
> ignore review comments (I betted due to mail setup problem that prevents
> them from properly repling to mailing lists, which is unfortunate). I
> was nitpicking because the diff context doesn't look clear to me (what
> function name?).
> 

And no wonder why several maintainers also highlight this (which prompted
me to review that way):

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/162b5545-7d24-3cf2-9158-3100ef644e03@linux.intel.com/
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/3a73cf7f02915891c77dc5a3203dc187f6d91194.camel@HansenPartnership.com/

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 01:50:34PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 08:33:14AM -0400, Shaomin Deng wrote:
> >> From: Mao Zhu <zhumao001@208suo.com>
> >> 
> >> Delete duplicated word in comment.
> >
> > On what function?
> 
> Bagas, do I *really* have to ask you, yet again, to stop nitpicking our
> contributors into the ground?  It appears I do.  So:
> 
> Bagas, *stop* this.  It's a typo patch removing an extraneous word.  The
> changelog is fine.  We absolutely do not need you playing changelog cop
> and harassing contributors over this kind of thing.

Amen.

> >> Signed-off-by: Mao Zhu <zhumao001@208suo.com>
> >
> > You're carrying someone else's patch, so besides SoB from original
> > author, you need to also have your own SoB.
> 
> This, instead, is a valid problem that needs to be fixed.

I mean ... yes, technically, it does.  But it's a change that deletes
a word in a comment.  Honestly, I'd take the patch without any kind of
sign-off.  It doesn't create any copyright claim, which is the purpose
of the DCO.

On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 09:07:22PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 01:50:34PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> > Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> writes:
> > 
> > > On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 08:33:14AM -0400, Shaomin Deng wrote:
> > >> From: Mao Zhu <zhumao001@208suo.com>
> > >> 
> > >> Delete duplicated word in comment.
> > >
> > > On what function?
> > 
> > Bagas, do I *really* have to ask you, yet again, to stop nitpicking our
> > contributors into the ground?  It appears I do.  So:
> > 
> > Bagas, *stop* this.  It's a typo patch removing an extraneous word.  The
> > changelog is fine.  We absolutely do not need you playing changelog cop
> > and harassing contributors over this kind of thing.
> 
> Amen.
> 

Amen too. Hope I can learn from this.

> > >> Signed-off-by: Mao Zhu <zhumao001@208suo.com>
> > >
> > > You're carrying someone else's patch, so besides SoB from original
> > > author, you need to also have your own SoB.
> > 
> > This, instead, is a valid problem that needs to be fixed.
> 
> I mean ... yes, technically, it does.  But it's a change that deletes
> a word in a comment.  Honestly, I'd take the patch without any kind of
> sign-off.  It doesn't create any copyright claim, which is the purpose
> of the DCO.

What? Relaxed SoB requirement for trivial patches like this? I thought
that SoB rules also apply to these patches.

Thanks.

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara