drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-s6d7aa0.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
Remove unneeded variable and directly return 0.
Signed-off-by: Wang Jianzheng <wangjianzheng@vivo.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-s6d7aa0.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-s6d7aa0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-s6d7aa0.c
index 102e1fc7ee38..fec0d014fd0e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-s6d7aa0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-s6d7aa0.c
@@ -66,7 +66,6 @@ static void s6d7aa0_reset(struct s6d7aa0 *ctx)
static int s6d7aa0_lock(struct s6d7aa0 *ctx, bool lock)
{
struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = ctx->dsi;
- int ret = 0;
if (lock) {
mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, MCS_PASSWD1, 0xa5, 0xa5);
@@ -80,7 +79,7 @@ static int s6d7aa0_lock(struct s6d7aa0 *ctx, bool lock)
mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, MCS_PASSWD3, 0xa5, 0xa5);
}
- return ret;
+ return 0;
}
static int s6d7aa0_on(struct s6d7aa0 *ctx)
--
2.39.0
Hi,
On Thu, 08 Jun 2023 11:34:46 +0800, Wang Jianzheng wrote:
> Remove unneeded variable and directly return 0.
>
>
Thanks, Applied to https://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/drm/drm-misc.git (drm-misc-next)
[1/1] drm/panel: s6d7aa0: remove the unneeded variable in s6d7aa0_lock
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc/commit/?id=c5dacfe2e6c1251276e29b4cdac771f504593523
--
Neil
On 08/06/2023 05:34, Wang Jianzheng wrote:
> Remove unneeded variable and directly return 0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Jianzheng <wangjianzheng@vivo.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-s6d7aa0.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-s6d7aa0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-s6d7aa0.c
> index 102e1fc7ee38..fec0d014fd0e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-s6d7aa0.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-s6d7aa0.c
> @@ -66,7 +66,6 @@ static void s6d7aa0_reset(struct s6d7aa0 *ctx)
> static int s6d7aa0_lock(struct s6d7aa0 *ctx, bool lock)
> {
> struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = ctx->dsi;
> - int ret = 0;
>
> if (lock) {
> mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, MCS_PASSWD1, 0xa5, 0xa5);
> @@ -80,7 +79,7 @@ static int s6d7aa0_lock(struct s6d7aa0 *ctx, bool lock)
> mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, MCS_PASSWD3, 0xa5, 0xa5);
> }
>
> - return ret;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static int s6d7aa0_on(struct s6d7aa0 *ctx)
Reviewed-by: Artur Weber <aweber.kernel@gmail.com>
Best regards
Artur
Hi Jianzheng,
On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 11:34:46AM +0800, Wang Jianzheng wrote:
> Remove unneeded variable and directly return 0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Jianzheng <wangjianzheng@vivo.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-s6d7aa0.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-s6d7aa0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-s6d7aa0.c
> index 102e1fc7ee38..fec0d014fd0e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-s6d7aa0.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-s6d7aa0.c
> @@ -66,7 +66,6 @@ static void s6d7aa0_reset(struct s6d7aa0 *ctx)
> static int s6d7aa0_lock(struct s6d7aa0 *ctx, bool lock)
actually this function can completely made void.
> {
> struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = ctx->dsi;
> - int ret = 0;
>
> if (lock) {
> mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, MCS_PASSWD1, 0xa5, 0xa5);
> @@ -80,7 +79,7 @@ static int s6d7aa0_lock(struct s6d7aa0 *ctx, bool lock)
> mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, MCS_PASSWD3, 0xa5, 0xa5);
> }
>
> - return ret;
> + return 0;
Anyway the patch is fine:
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Andi
> }
>
> static int s6d7aa0_on(struct s6d7aa0 *ctx)
> --
> 2.39.0
On 08/06/2023 11:36, Andi Shyti wrote: > Hi Jianzheng, > > On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 11:34:46AM +0800, Wang Jianzheng wrote: >> Remove unneeded variable and directly return 0. >> >> Signed-off-by: Wang Jianzheng <wangjianzheng@vivo.com> >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-s6d7aa0.c | 3 +-- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-s6d7aa0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-s6d7aa0.c >> index 102e1fc7ee38..fec0d014fd0e 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-s6d7aa0.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-s6d7aa0.c >> @@ -66,7 +66,6 @@ static void s6d7aa0_reset(struct s6d7aa0 *ctx) >> static int s6d7aa0_lock(struct s6d7aa0 *ctx, bool lock) > > actually this function can completely made void. It can't be made void, as the mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq() macro calls return with an int[1]. Best regards Artur [1] https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v6.4-rc5/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h#L319-L337
On 08/06/2023 05:34, Wang Jianzheng wrote:
> Remove unneeded variable and directly return 0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Jianzheng <wangjianzheng@vivo.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-s6d7aa0.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-s6d7aa0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-s6d7aa0.c
> index 102e1fc7ee38..fec0d014fd0e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-s6d7aa0.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-s6d7aa0.c
> @@ -66,7 +66,6 @@ static void s6d7aa0_reset(struct s6d7aa0 *ctx)
> static int s6d7aa0_lock(struct s6d7aa0 *ctx, bool lock)
> {
> struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = ctx->dsi;
> - int ret = 0;
>
> if (lock) {
> mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, MCS_PASSWD1, 0xa5, 0xa5);
> @@ -80,7 +79,7 @@ static int s6d7aa0_lock(struct s6d7aa0 *ctx, bool lock)
> mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, MCS_PASSWD3, 0xa5, 0xa5);
> }
>
> - return ret;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static int s6d7aa0_on(struct s6d7aa0 *ctx)
Acked-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.