Explicitely zero-ize the local mdio_regmap_config data, and explicitely
set the .autoscan parameter, as we only have a PCS on this bus.
Fixes: 5d1f3fe7d2d5 ("net: stmmac: dwmac-sogfpga: use the lynx pcs driver")
Suggested-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Suggested-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
---
V3->V4 : Move pcs_regmap_cfg into a more local block, and zeroize mrc
V2->V3 : New patch
.../net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-socfpga.c | 15 +++++++++------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-socfpga.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-socfpga.c
index 1fb808be843b..6267bcb60206 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-socfpga.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-socfpga.c
@@ -389,7 +389,6 @@ static int socfpga_dwmac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct net_device *ndev;
struct stmmac_priv *stpriv;
const struct socfpga_dwmac_ops *ops;
- struct regmap_config pcs_regmap_cfg;
ops = device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
if (!ops) {
@@ -447,19 +446,22 @@ static int socfpga_dwmac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (ret)
goto err_dvr_remove;
- memset(&pcs_regmap_cfg, 0, sizeof(pcs_regmap_cfg));
- pcs_regmap_cfg.reg_bits = 16;
- pcs_regmap_cfg.val_bits = 16;
- pcs_regmap_cfg.reg_shift = REGMAP_UPSHIFT(1);
-
/* Create a regmap for the PCS so that it can be used by the PCS driver,
* if we have such a PCS
*/
if (dwmac->tse_pcs_base) {
+ struct regmap_config pcs_regmap_cfg;
struct mdio_regmap_config mrc;
struct regmap *pcs_regmap;
struct mii_bus *pcs_bus;
+ memset(&pcs_regmap_cfg, 0, sizeof(pcs_regmap_cfg));
+ memset(&mrc, 0, sizeof(mrc));
+
+ pcs_regmap_cfg.reg_bits = 16;
+ pcs_regmap_cfg.val_bits = 16;
+ pcs_regmap_cfg.reg_shift = REGMAP_UPSHIFT(1);
+
pcs_regmap = devm_regmap_init_mmio(&pdev->dev, dwmac->tse_pcs_base,
&pcs_regmap_cfg);
if (IS_ERR(pcs_regmap)) {
@@ -470,6 +472,7 @@ static int socfpga_dwmac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
mrc.regmap = pcs_regmap;
mrc.parent = &pdev->dev;
mrc.valid_addr = 0x0;
+ mrc.autoscan = false;
snprintf(mrc.name, MII_BUS_ID_SIZE, "%s-pcs-mii", ndev->name);
pcs_bus = devm_mdio_regmap_register(&pdev->dev, &mrc);
--
2.40.1
On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 03:59:41PM +0200, Maxime Chevallier wrote: > Explicitely zero-ize the local mdio_regmap_config data, and explicitely nit: Explicitely -> explicitly
On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 03:59:41PM +0200, Maxime Chevallier wrote: > @@ -447,19 +446,22 @@ static int socfpga_dwmac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > struct mdio_regmap_config mrc; > struct regmap *pcs_regmap; > struct mii_bus *pcs_bus; > ... > + memset(&mrc, 0, sizeof(mrc)); ... > mrc.parent = &pdev->dev; > mrc.valid_addr = 0x0; > + mrc.autoscan = false; Isn't this covered by the memset() ? -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
On Wed, 7 Jun 2023 13:28:03 +0100 "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 03:59:41PM +0200, Maxime Chevallier wrote: > > @@ -447,19 +446,22 @@ static int socfpga_dwmac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > struct mdio_regmap_config mrc; > > struct regmap *pcs_regmap; > > struct mii_bus *pcs_bus; > > > ... > > + memset(&mrc, 0, sizeof(mrc)); > ... > > mrc.parent = &pdev->dev; > > mrc.valid_addr = 0x0; > > + mrc.autoscan = false; > > Isn't this covered by the memset() ? I have the same answer as for the above. It's redundant, but I don't think there's any harm having it set explicitely ? Maxime
On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 04:54:09PM +0200, Maxime Chevallier wrote: > On Wed, 7 Jun 2023 13:28:03 +0100 > "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 03:59:41PM +0200, Maxime Chevallier wrote: > > > @@ -447,19 +446,22 @@ static int socfpga_dwmac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > > struct mdio_regmap_config mrc; > > > struct regmap *pcs_regmap; > > > struct mii_bus *pcs_bus; > > > > > ... > > > + memset(&mrc, 0, sizeof(mrc)); > > ... > > > mrc.parent = &pdev->dev; > > > mrc.valid_addr = 0x0; > > > + mrc.autoscan = false; > > > > Isn't this covered by the memset() ? > > I have the same answer as for the above. It's redundant, but I don't > think there's any harm having it set explicitely ? No harm, just redundant. I don't think this is a good enough reason not to merge it. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.