[PATCH net-next v5 1/3] net-memcg: Fold dependency into memcg pressure cond

Abel Wu posted 3 patches 2 years, 8 months ago
[PATCH net-next v5 1/3] net-memcg: Fold dependency into memcg pressure cond
Posted by Abel Wu 2 years, 8 months ago
The callers of mem_cgroup_under_socket_pressure() should always make
sure that (mem_cgroup_sockets_enabled && sk->sk_memcg) is true. So
instead of coding around all the callsites, put the dependencies into
mem_cgroup_under_socket_pressure() to avoid redundancy and possibly
bugs.

This change might also introduce slight function call overhead *iff*
the function gets expanded in the future. But for now this change
doesn't make binaries different (checked by vimdiff) except the one
net/ipv4/tcp_input.o (by scripts/bloat-o-meter), which is probably
negligible to performance:

add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 1/2 up/down: 5/-5 (0)
Function                                     old     new   delta
tcp_grow_window                              573     578      +5
tcp_try_rmem_schedule                       1083    1081      -2
tcp_check_space                              324     321      -3
Total: Before=44647, After=44647, chg +0.00%

So folding the dependencies into mem_cgroup_under_socket_pressure()
is generally a good thing and provides better readablility.

Signed-off-by: Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@bytedance.com>
---
 include/linux/memcontrol.h | 2 ++
 include/net/sock.h         | 3 +--
 include/net/tcp.h          | 3 +--
 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index 222d7370134c..a1aead140ff8 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -1743,6 +1743,8 @@ void mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(struct sock *sk);
 void mem_cgroup_sk_free(struct sock *sk);
 static inline bool mem_cgroup_under_socket_pressure(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 {
+	if (!mem_cgroup_sockets_enabled || !memcg)
+		return false;
 	if (!cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(memory_cgrp_subsys) && memcg->tcpmem_pressure)
 		return true;
 	do {
diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
index 656ea89f60ff..3f63253ee092 100644
--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h
@@ -1414,8 +1414,7 @@ static inline bool sk_under_memory_pressure(const struct sock *sk)
 	if (!sk->sk_prot->memory_pressure)
 		return false;
 
-	if (mem_cgroup_sockets_enabled && sk->sk_memcg &&
-	    mem_cgroup_under_socket_pressure(sk->sk_memcg))
+	if (mem_cgroup_under_socket_pressure(sk->sk_memcg))
 		return true;
 
 	return !!*sk->sk_prot->memory_pressure;
diff --git a/include/net/tcp.h b/include/net/tcp.h
index 14fa716cac50..d4c358bc0c52 100644
--- a/include/net/tcp.h
+++ b/include/net/tcp.h
@@ -259,8 +259,7 @@ extern unsigned long tcp_memory_pressure;
 /* optimized version of sk_under_memory_pressure() for TCP sockets */
 static inline bool tcp_under_memory_pressure(const struct sock *sk)
 {
-	if (mem_cgroup_sockets_enabled && sk->sk_memcg &&
-	    mem_cgroup_under_socket_pressure(sk->sk_memcg))
+	if (mem_cgroup_under_socket_pressure(sk->sk_memcg))
 		return true;
 
 	return READ_ONCE(tcp_memory_pressure);
-- 
2.37.3
Re: [PATCH net-next v5 1/3] net-memcg: Fold dependency into memcg pressure cond
Posted by Shakeel Butt 2 years, 8 months ago
On Fri, Jun 02, 2023 at 04:11:33PM +0800, Abel Wu wrote:
> The callers of mem_cgroup_under_socket_pressure() should always make
> sure that (mem_cgroup_sockets_enabled && sk->sk_memcg) is true. So
> instead of coding around all the callsites, put the dependencies into
> mem_cgroup_under_socket_pressure() to avoid redundancy and possibly
> bugs.
> 
> This change might also introduce slight function call overhead *iff*
> the function gets expanded in the future. But for now this change
> doesn't make binaries different (checked by vimdiff) except the one
> net/ipv4/tcp_input.o (by scripts/bloat-o-meter), which is probably
> negligible to performance:
> 
> add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 1/2 up/down: 5/-5 (0)
> Function                                     old     new   delta
> tcp_grow_window                              573     578      +5
> tcp_try_rmem_schedule                       1083    1081      -2
> tcp_check_space                              324     321      -3
> Total: Before=44647, After=44647, chg +0.00%
> 
> So folding the dependencies into mem_cgroup_under_socket_pressure()
> is generally a good thing and provides better readablility.
> 

I don't see how it is improving readability. If you have removed the use
of mem_cgroup_sockets_enabled completely from the networking then I can
understand but this change IMHO will actually decrease the readability
because the later readers will have to reason why we are doing this
check at some places but not other.
Re: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 1/3] net-memcg: Fold dependency into memcg pressure cond
Posted by Abel Wu 2 years, 8 months ago
On 6/3/23 4:25 AM, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 02, 2023 at 04:11:33PM +0800, Abel Wu wrote:
>> The callers of mem_cgroup_under_socket_pressure() should always make
>> sure that (mem_cgroup_sockets_enabled && sk->sk_memcg) is true. So
>> instead of coding around all the callsites, put the dependencies into
>> mem_cgroup_under_socket_pressure() to avoid redundancy and possibly
>> bugs.
>>
>> This change might also introduce slight function call overhead *iff*
>> the function gets expanded in the future. But for now this change
>> doesn't make binaries different (checked by vimdiff) except the one
>> net/ipv4/tcp_input.o (by scripts/bloat-o-meter), which is probably
>> negligible to performance:
>>
>> add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 1/2 up/down: 5/-5 (0)
>> Function                                     old     new   delta
>> tcp_grow_window                              573     578      +5
>> tcp_try_rmem_schedule                       1083    1081      -2
>> tcp_check_space                              324     321      -3
>> Total: Before=44647, After=44647, chg +0.00%
>>
>> So folding the dependencies into mem_cgroup_under_socket_pressure()
>> is generally a good thing and provides better readablility.
>>
> 
> I don't see how it is improving readability. If you have removed the use
> of mem_cgroup_sockets_enabled completely from the networking then I can
> understand but this change IMHO will actually decrease the readability
> because the later readers will have to reason why we are doing this
> check at some places but not other.

Yes, I agree. I am trying to let networking get rid of this macro
entirely, but get stuck on inet_csk_accept().. :(