Checking NULL value of 'table' variable deserves a BUG_ON as the
following code will trigger a crash by dereferencing the NULL
'table' pointer. Crash in advance with BUG_ON to avoid WARN_ON
plus NULL pointer dereferencing can simplify the crash log.
Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@intel.com>
---
drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
index e98f1b122b49..8aa3bfdb7f95 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
@@ -1944,7 +1944,7 @@ static int domain_context_mapping_one(struct dmar_domain *domain,
if (sm_supported(iommu)) {
unsigned long pds;
- WARN_ON(!table);
+ BUG_ON(!table);
/* Setup the PASID DIR pointer: */
pds = context_get_sm_pds(table);
--
2.34.1
On 5/30/23 5:25 PM, Yanfei Xu wrote:
> Checking NULL value of 'table' variable deserves a BUG_ON as the
> following code will trigger a crash by dereferencing the NULL
> 'table' pointer. Crash in advance with BUG_ON to avoid WARN_ON
> plus NULL pointer dereferencing can simplify the crash log.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu<yanfei.xu@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> index e98f1b122b49..8aa3bfdb7f95 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> @@ -1944,7 +1944,7 @@ static int domain_context_mapping_one(struct dmar_domain *domain,
> if (sm_supported(iommu)) {
> unsigned long pds;
>
> - WARN_ON(!table);
> + BUG_ON(!table);
BUG_ON() is not recommended. Perhaps,
if (!table)
-ENODEV;
?
Best regards,
baolu
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 11:26:55AM +0800, Baolu Lu wrote:
> On 5/30/23 5:25 PM, Yanfei Xu wrote:
> > Checking NULL value of 'table' variable deserves a BUG_ON as the
> > following code will trigger a crash by dereferencing the NULL
> > 'table' pointer. Crash in advance with BUG_ON to avoid WARN_ON
> > plus NULL pointer dereferencing can simplify the crash log.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu<yanfei.xu@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> > index e98f1b122b49..8aa3bfdb7f95 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> > @@ -1944,7 +1944,7 @@ static int domain_context_mapping_one(struct dmar_domain *domain,
> > if (sm_supported(iommu)) {
> > unsigned long pds;
> > - WARN_ON(!table);
> > + BUG_ON(!table);
>
> BUG_ON() is not recommended. Perhaps,
>
> if (!table)
> -ENODEV;
>
> ?
If it is not something you think needs active debugging then just let
it crash on the NULL pointer deref. You get a nice backtrace from that
already.
The additional value of the WARN is it gives you a line number, a
prettier print and it might recover more cleanly (or not, it might
just crash somewhere else).
Jason
Hi Baolu,
On 5/31/2023 11:26 AM, Baolu Lu wrote:
> On 5/30/23 5:25 PM, Yanfei Xu wrote:
>> Checking NULL value of 'table' variable deserves a BUG_ON as the
>> following code will trigger a crash by dereferencing the NULL
>> 'table' pointer. Crash in advance with BUG_ON to avoid WARN_ON
>> plus NULL pointer dereferencing can simplify the crash log.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu<yanfei.xu@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
>> index e98f1b122b49..8aa3bfdb7f95 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
>> @@ -1944,7 +1944,7 @@ static int domain_context_mapping_one(struct
>> dmar_domain *domain,
>> if (sm_supported(iommu)) {
>> unsigned long pds;
>> - WARN_ON(!table);
>> + BUG_ON(!table);
>
> BUG_ON() is not recommended. Perhaps,
>
> if (!table)
> -ENODEV;
>
Agree:) It is always better to handle the error than crash kernel.
How about:
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
index 8096273b034c..7f077e3a4128 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
@@ -1944,7 +1944,10 @@ static int domain_context_mapping_one(struct
dmar_domain *domain,
if (sm_supported(iommu)) {
unsigned long pds;
- WARN_ON(!table);
+ if (WARN_ON(!table)) {
+ ret = -ENODEV;
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
Thanks,
Yanfei
> ?
>
> Best regards,
> baolu
On 5/31/23 3:09 PM, Yanfei Xu wrote:
> On 5/31/2023 11:26 AM, Baolu Lu wrote:
>> On 5/30/23 5:25 PM, Yanfei Xu wrote:
>>> Checking NULL value of 'table' variable deserves a BUG_ON as the
>>> following code will trigger a crash by dereferencing the NULL
>>> 'table' pointer. Crash in advance with BUG_ON to avoid WARN_ON
>>> plus NULL pointer dereferencing can simplify the crash log.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu<yanfei.xu@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
>>> index e98f1b122b49..8aa3bfdb7f95 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
>>> @@ -1944,7 +1944,7 @@ static int domain_context_mapping_one(struct
>>> dmar_domain *domain,
>>> if (sm_supported(iommu)) {
>>> unsigned long pds;
>>> - WARN_ON(!table);
>>> + BUG_ON(!table);
>>
>> BUG_ON() is not recommended. Perhaps,
>>
>> if (!table)
>> -ENODEV;
>>
> Agree:) It is always better to handle the error than crash kernel.
>
> How about:
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> index 8096273b034c..7f077e3a4128 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> @@ -1944,7 +1944,10 @@ static int domain_context_mapping_one(struct
> dmar_domain *domain,
> if (sm_supported(iommu)) {
> unsigned long pds;
>
> - WARN_ON(!table);
> + if (WARN_ON(!table)) {
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto out_unlock;
> + }
I'd recommend to remove this line directly. This pointer will be
accessed in the following code, if empty "table" really happens, the
kernel will report a NULL pointer reference warning at the first place.
In the same function, I also saw "WARN_ON(did == 0);". It's unnecessary
as domain_id_iommu() will never return 0. Perhaps we can clean it up as
well.
Best regards,
baolu
On 6/1/2023 9:23 AM, Baolu Lu wrote:
> On 5/31/23 3:09 PM, Yanfei Xu wrote:
>> On 5/31/2023 11:26 AM, Baolu Lu wrote:
>>> On 5/30/23 5:25 PM, Yanfei Xu wrote:
>>>> Checking NULL value of 'table' variable deserves a BUG_ON as the
>>>> following code will trigger a crash by dereferencing the NULL
>>>> 'table' pointer. Crash in advance with BUG_ON to avoid WARN_ON
>>>> plus NULL pointer dereferencing can simplify the crash log.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu<yanfei.xu@intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 2 +-
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
>>>> index e98f1b122b49..8aa3bfdb7f95 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
>>>> @@ -1944,7 +1944,7 @@ static int domain_context_mapping_one(struct
>>>> dmar_domain *domain,
>>>> if (sm_supported(iommu)) {
>>>> unsigned long pds;
>>>> - WARN_ON(!table);
>>>> + BUG_ON(!table);
>>>
>>> BUG_ON() is not recommended. Perhaps,
>>>
>>> if (!table)
>>> -ENODEV;
>>>
>> Agree:) It is always better to handle the error than crash kernel.
>>
>> How about:
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
>> index 8096273b034c..7f077e3a4128 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
>> @@ -1944,7 +1944,10 @@ static int domain_context_mapping_one(struct
>> dmar_domain *domain,
>> if (sm_supported(iommu)) {
>> unsigned long pds;
>>
>> - WARN_ON(!table);
>> + if (WARN_ON(!table)) {
>> + ret = -ENODEV;
>> + goto out_unlock;
>> + }
>
> I'd recommend to remove this line directly. This pointer will be
> accessed in the following code, if empty "table" really happens, the
> kernel will report a NULL pointer reference warning at the first place.
>
> In the same function, I also saw "WARN_ON(did == 0);". It's unnecessary
> as domain_id_iommu() will never return 0. Perhaps we can clean it up as
> well.
Will do in V2.
Thanks,
Yanfei
>
> Best regards,
> baolu
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.