Add the QFPROM compatible for IPQ5332, IPQ6018 and IPQ9574
Signed-off-by: Kathiravan T <quic_kathirav@quicinc.com>
---
Changes in V2:
- No changes
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/qcom,qfprom.yaml | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/qcom,qfprom.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/qcom,qfprom.yaml
index 8d8503dd934b..076566ef9cc8 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/qcom,qfprom.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/qcom,qfprom.yaml
@@ -18,8 +18,11 @@ properties:
- enum:
- qcom,apq8064-qfprom
- qcom,apq8084-qfprom
+ - qcom,ipq5332-qfprom
+ - qcom,ipq6018-qfprom
- qcom,ipq8064-qfprom
- qcom,ipq8074-qfprom
+ - qcom,ipq9574-qfprom
- qcom,msm8916-qfprom
- qcom,msm8974-qfprom
- qcom,msm8976-qfprom
--
2.17.1
On 26/05/2023 14:53, Kathiravan T wrote: > Add the QFPROM compatible for IPQ5332, IPQ6018 and IPQ9574 > > Signed-off-by: Kathiravan T <quic_kathirav@quicinc.com> > --- > Changes in V2: > - No changes This is a friendly reminder during the review process. It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it. If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation: Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply. https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.17/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L540 If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed. Best regards, Krzysztof
On Fri, 26 May 2023 18:23:02 +0530, Kathiravan T wrote: > Add the QFPROM compatible for IPQ5332, IPQ6018 and IPQ9574 > > Signed-off-by: Kathiravan T <quic_kathirav@quicinc.com> > --- > Changes in V2: > - No changes > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/qcom,qfprom.yaml | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > Running 'make dtbs_check' with the schema in this patch gives the following warnings. Consider if they are expected or the schema is incorrect. These may not be new warnings. Note that it is not yet a requirement to have 0 warnings for dtbs_check. This will change in the future. Full log is available here: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1786533 qfprom@1b44000: compatible:0: 'qcom,qcm2290-qfprom' is not one of ['qcom,apq8064-qfprom', 'qcom,apq8084-qfprom', 'qcom,ipq5332-qfprom', 'qcom,ipq6018-qfprom', 'qcom,ipq8064-qfprom', 'qcom,ipq8074-qfprom', 'qcom,ipq9574-qfprom', 'qcom,msm8916-qfprom', 'qcom,msm8974-qfprom', 'qcom,msm8976-qfprom', 'qcom,msm8996-qfprom', 'qcom,msm8998-qfprom', 'qcom,qcs404-qfprom', 'qcom,sc7180-qfprom', 'qcom,sc7280-qfprom', 'qcom,sdm630-qfprom', 'qcom,sdm670-qfprom', 'qcom,sdm845-qfprom', 'qcom,sm6115-qfprom', 'qcom,sm6350-qfprom', 'qcom,sm6375-qfprom', 'qcom,sm8150-qfprom', 'qcom,sm8250-qfprom'] arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qrb2210-rb1.dtb qfprom@1b44000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('compatible' was unexpected) arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qrb2210-rb1.dtb qfprom@700000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('ranges' was unexpected) arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-asus-nexus7-flo.dtb arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-cm-qs600.dtb arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-ifc6410.dtb arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-sony-xperia-lagan-yuga.dtb
On 30/05/2023 14:59, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Fri, 26 May 2023 18:23:02 +0530, Kathiravan T wrote: >> Add the QFPROM compatible for IPQ5332, IPQ6018 and IPQ9574 >> >> Signed-off-by: Kathiravan T <quic_kathirav@quicinc.com> >> --- >> Changes in V2: >> - No changes >> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/qcom,qfprom.yaml | 3 +++ >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) >> > > Running 'make dtbs_check' with the schema in this patch gives the > following warnings. Consider if they are expected or the schema is > incorrect. These may not be new warnings. > > Note that it is not yet a requirement to have 0 warnings for dtbs_check. > This will change in the future. > > Full log is available here: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1786533 > > > qfprom@1b44000: compatible:0: 'qcom,qcm2290-qfprom' is not one of ['qcom,apq8064-qfprom', 'qcom,apq8084-qfprom', 'qcom,ipq5332-qfprom', 'qcom,ipq6018-qfprom', 'qcom,ipq8064-qfprom', 'qcom,ipq8074-qfprom', 'qcom,ipq9574-qfprom', 'qcom,msm8916-qfprom', 'qcom,msm8974-qfprom', 'qcom,msm8976-qfprom', 'qcom,msm8996-qfprom', 'qcom,msm8998-qfprom', 'qcom,qcs404-qfprom', 'qcom,sc7180-qfprom', 'qcom,sc7280-qfprom', 'qcom,sdm630-qfprom', 'qcom,sdm670-qfprom', 'qcom,sdm845-qfprom', 'qcom,sm6115-qfprom', 'qcom,sm6350-qfprom', 'qcom,sm6375-qfprom', 'qcom,sm8150-qfprom', 'qcom,sm8250-qfprom'] > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qrb2210-rb1.dtb Not related, can be ignored. Best regards, Krzysztof
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.