Add the QFPROM compatible for IPQ5332, IPQ6018 and IPQ9574

Signed-off-by: Kathiravan T <quic_kathirav@quicinc.com>
---
Changes in V2:
	- No changes

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/qcom,qfprom.yaml | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/qcom,qfprom.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/qcom,qfprom.yaml
index 8d8503dd934b..076566ef9cc8 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/qcom,qfprom.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/qcom,qfprom.yaml
@@ -18,8 +18,11 @@ properties:
       - enum:
           - qcom,apq8064-qfprom
           - qcom,apq8084-qfprom
+          - qcom,ipq5332-qfprom
+          - qcom,ipq6018-qfprom
           - qcom,ipq8064-qfprom
           - qcom,ipq8074-qfprom
+          - qcom,ipq9574-qfprom
           - qcom,msm8916-qfprom
           - qcom,msm8974-qfprom
           - qcom,msm8976-qfprom
-- 
2.17.1

On 26/05/2023 14:53, Kathiravan T wrote:
> Add the QFPROM compatible for IPQ5332, IPQ6018 and IPQ9574
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kathiravan T <quic_kathirav@quicinc.com>
> ---
> Changes in V2:
> 	- No changes

This is a friendly reminder during the review process.

It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.

If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
versions. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the
tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for acks received on the
version they apply.

https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.17/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L540

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

On Fri, 26 May 2023 18:23:02 +0530, Kathiravan T wrote:
> Add the QFPROM compatible for IPQ5332, IPQ6018 and IPQ9574
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kathiravan T <quic_kathirav@quicinc.com>
> ---
> Changes in V2:
> 	- No changes
> 
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/qcom,qfprom.yaml | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 

Running 'make dtbs_check' with the schema in this patch gives the
following warnings. Consider if they are expected or the schema is
incorrect. These may not be new warnings.

Note that it is not yet a requirement to have 0 warnings for dtbs_check.
This will change in the future.

Full log is available here: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1786533


qfprom@1b44000: compatible:0: 'qcom,qcm2290-qfprom' is not one of ['qcom,apq8064-qfprom', 'qcom,apq8084-qfprom', 'qcom,ipq5332-qfprom', 'qcom,ipq6018-qfprom', 'qcom,ipq8064-qfprom', 'qcom,ipq8074-qfprom', 'qcom,ipq9574-qfprom', 'qcom,msm8916-qfprom', 'qcom,msm8974-qfprom', 'qcom,msm8976-qfprom', 'qcom,msm8996-qfprom', 'qcom,msm8998-qfprom', 'qcom,qcs404-qfprom', 'qcom,sc7180-qfprom', 'qcom,sc7280-qfprom', 'qcom,sdm630-qfprom', 'qcom,sdm670-qfprom', 'qcom,sdm845-qfprom', 'qcom,sm6115-qfprom', 'qcom,sm6350-qfprom', 'qcom,sm6375-qfprom', 'qcom,sm8150-qfprom', 'qcom,sm8250-qfprom']
	arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qrb2210-rb1.dtb

qfprom@1b44000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('compatible' was unexpected)
	arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qrb2210-rb1.dtb

qfprom@700000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('ranges' was unexpected)
	arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-asus-nexus7-flo.dtb
	arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-cm-qs600.dtb
	arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-ifc6410.dtb
	arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-sony-xperia-lagan-yuga.dtb

On 30/05/2023 14:59, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Fri, 26 May 2023 18:23:02 +0530, Kathiravan T wrote:
>> Add the QFPROM compatible for IPQ5332, IPQ6018 and IPQ9574
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kathiravan T <quic_kathirav@quicinc.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in V2:
>> 	- No changes
>>
>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/qcom,qfprom.yaml | 3 +++
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
> 
> Running 'make dtbs_check' with the schema in this patch gives the
> following warnings. Consider if they are expected or the schema is
> incorrect. These may not be new warnings.
> 
> Note that it is not yet a requirement to have 0 warnings for dtbs_check.
> This will change in the future.
> 
> Full log is available here: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1786533
> 
> 
> qfprom@1b44000: compatible:0: 'qcom,qcm2290-qfprom' is not one of ['qcom,apq8064-qfprom', 'qcom,apq8084-qfprom', 'qcom,ipq5332-qfprom', 'qcom,ipq6018-qfprom', 'qcom,ipq8064-qfprom', 'qcom,ipq8074-qfprom', 'qcom,ipq9574-qfprom', 'qcom,msm8916-qfprom', 'qcom,msm8974-qfprom', 'qcom,msm8976-qfprom', 'qcom,msm8996-qfprom', 'qcom,msm8998-qfprom', 'qcom,qcs404-qfprom', 'qcom,sc7180-qfprom', 'qcom,sc7280-qfprom', 'qcom,sdm630-qfprom', 'qcom,sdm670-qfprom', 'qcom,sdm845-qfprom', 'qcom,sm6115-qfprom', 'qcom,sm6350-qfprom', 'qcom,sm6375-qfprom', 'qcom,sm8150-qfprom', 'qcom,sm8250-qfprom']
> 	arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qrb2210-rb1.dtb

Not related, can be ignored.

Best regards,
Krzysztof