[PATCH v2 1/4] rust: sync: reword the `Arc` safety comment for `Send`

Alice Ryhl posted 4 patches 2 years, 8 months ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH v2 1/4] rust: sync: reword the `Arc` safety comment for `Send`
Posted by Alice Ryhl 2 years, 8 months ago
The safety comment on `impl Send for Arc` talks about "directly"
accessing the value, when it really means "accessing the value with a
mutable reference". This commit clarifies that.

Suggested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
---
 rust/kernel/sync/arc.rs | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/rust/kernel/sync/arc.rs b/rust/kernel/sync/arc.rs
index e6d206242465..87a4c9ed712b 100644
--- a/rust/kernel/sync/arc.rs
+++ b/rust/kernel/sync/arc.rs
@@ -146,8 +146,8 @@ impl<T: ?Sized + Unsize<U>, U: ?Sized> core::ops::DispatchFromDyn<Arc<U>> for Ar
 
 // SAFETY: It is safe to send `Arc<T>` to another thread when the underlying `T` is `Sync` because
 // it effectively means sharing `&T` (which is safe because `T` is `Sync`); additionally, it needs
-// `T` to be `Send` because any thread that has an `Arc<T>` may ultimately access `T` directly, for
-// example, when the reference count reaches zero and `T` is dropped.
+// `T` to be `Send` because any thread that has an `Arc<T>` may ultimately access `T` using a
+// mutable reference, for example, when the reference count reaches zero and `T` is dropped.
 unsafe impl<T: ?Sized + Sync + Send> Send for Arc<T> {}
 
 // SAFETY: It is safe to send `&Arc<T>` to another thread when the underlying `T` is `Sync` for the
-- 
2.40.1.698.g37aff9b760-goog
Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] rust: sync: reword the `Arc` safety comment for `Send`
Posted by Benno Lossin 2 years, 8 months ago
On 5/23/23 16:44, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> The safety comment on `impl Send for Arc` talks about "directly"
> accessing the value, when it really means "accessing the value with a
> mutable reference". This commit clarifies that.
> 
> Suggested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@samsung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>

> ---
>   rust/kernel/sync/arc.rs | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/sync/arc.rs b/rust/kernel/sync/arc.rs
> index e6d206242465..87a4c9ed712b 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/sync/arc.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/sync/arc.rs
> @@ -146,8 +146,8 @@ impl<T: ?Sized + Unsize<U>, U: ?Sized> core::ops::DispatchFromDyn<Arc<U>> for Ar
> 
>   // SAFETY: It is safe to send `Arc<T>` to another thread when the underlying `T` is `Sync` because
>   // it effectively means sharing `&T` (which is safe because `T` is `Sync`); additionally, it needs
> -// `T` to be `Send` because any thread that has an `Arc<T>` may ultimately access `T` directly, for
> -// example, when the reference count reaches zero and `T` is dropped.
> +// `T` to be `Send` because any thread that has an `Arc<T>` may ultimately access `T` using a
> +// mutable reference, for example, when the reference count reaches zero and `T` is dropped.
>   unsafe impl<T: ?Sized + Sync + Send> Send for Arc<T> {}
> 
>   // SAFETY: It is safe to send `&Arc<T>` to another thread when the underlying `T` is `Sync` for the
> --
> 2.40.1.698.g37aff9b760-goog
> 

-- 
Cheers,
Benno
Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] rust: sync: reword the `Arc` safety comment for `Send`
Posted by Martin Rodriguez Reboredo 2 years, 8 months ago
On 5/23/23 11:44, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> The safety comment on `impl Send for Arc` talks about "directly"
> accessing the value, when it really means "accessing the value with a
> mutable reference". This commit clarifies that.
> 
> Suggested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@samsung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
> ---
> [...]
>   
>   // SAFETY: It is safe to send `Arc<T>` to another thread when the underlying `T` is `Sync` because
>   // it effectively means sharing `&T` (which is safe because `T` is `Sync`); additionally, it needs
> -// `T` to be `Send` because any thread that has an `Arc<T>` may ultimately access `T` directly, for
> -// example, when the reference count reaches zero and `T` is dropped.
> +// `T` to be `Send` because any thread that has an `Arc<T>` may ultimately access `T` using a
> +// mutable reference, for example, when the reference count reaches zero and `T` is dropped.
>   unsafe impl<T: ?Sized + Sync + Send> Send for Arc<T> {}
>   
>   // SAFETY: It is safe to send `&Arc<T>` to another thread when the underlying `T` is `Sync` for the

Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com>
Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] rust: sync: reword the `Arc` safety comment for `Send`
Posted by Gary Guo 2 years, 8 months ago
On Tue, 23 May 2023 14:44:15 +0000
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> wrote:

> The safety comment on `impl Send for Arc` talks about "directly"
> accessing the value, when it really means "accessing the value with a
> mutable reference". This commit clarifies that.
> 
> Suggested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@samsung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>

> ---
>  rust/kernel/sync/arc.rs | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/sync/arc.rs b/rust/kernel/sync/arc.rs
> index e6d206242465..87a4c9ed712b 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/sync/arc.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/sync/arc.rs
> @@ -146,8 +146,8 @@ impl<T: ?Sized + Unsize<U>, U: ?Sized> core::ops::DispatchFromDyn<Arc<U>> for Ar
>  
>  // SAFETY: It is safe to send `Arc<T>` to another thread when the underlying `T` is `Sync` because
>  // it effectively means sharing `&T` (which is safe because `T` is `Sync`); additionally, it needs
> -// `T` to be `Send` because any thread that has an `Arc<T>` may ultimately access `T` directly, for
> -// example, when the reference count reaches zero and `T` is dropped.
> +// `T` to be `Send` because any thread that has an `Arc<T>` may ultimately access `T` using a
> +// mutable reference, for example, when the reference count reaches zero and `T` is dropped.
>  unsafe impl<T: ?Sized + Sync + Send> Send for Arc<T> {}
>  
>  // SAFETY: It is safe to send `&Arc<T>` to another thread when the underlying `T` is `Sync` for the