Add sdhci node for emmc in qdu1000-idp.
Signed-off-by: Komal Bajaj <quic_kbajaj@quicinc.com>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qdu1000-idp.dts | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qdu1000-idp.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qdu1000-idp.dts
index 9e9fd4b8023e..b2526e991548 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qdu1000-idp.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qdu1000-idp.dts
@@ -451,3 +451,14 @@
&uart7 {
status = "okay";
};
+
+&sdhc_1 {
+ status = "okay";
+
+ pinctrl-0 = <&sdc1_on_state>;
+ pinctrl-1 = <&sdc1_off_state>;
+ pinctrl-names = "default", "sleep";
+
+ vmmc-supply = <&vreg_l10a_2p95>;
+ vqmmc-supply = <&vreg_l7a_1p8>;
+};
--
2.17.1
On 5/19/23 2:21 PM, Komal Bajaj wrote:
> Add sdhci node for emmc in qdu1000-idp.
>
> Signed-off-by: Komal Bajaj <quic_kbajaj@quicinc.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qdu1000-idp.dts | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qdu1000-idp.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qdu1000-idp.dts
> index 9e9fd4b8023e..b2526e991548 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qdu1000-idp.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qdu1000-idp.dts
> @@ -451,3 +451,14 @@
> &uart7 {
> status = "okay";
> };
> +
> +&sdhc_1 {
> + status = "okay";
> +
> + pinctrl-0 = <&sdc1_on_state>;
> + pinctrl-1 = <&sdc1_off_state>;
> + pinctrl-names = "default", "sleep";
> +
> + vmmc-supply = <&vreg_l10a_2p95>;
> + vqmmc-supply = <&vreg_l7a_1p8>;
> +};
Again, please follow alphabetical order for adding new node entries.
Also, we have been placing 'status = .. ' entry at the end for new .dts
(or .dts entry), but if that is the format used across this board dts
I am ok with the same.
Thanks,
Bhupesh
On 19.05.2023 12:13, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
>
> On 5/19/23 2:21 PM, Komal Bajaj wrote:
>> Add sdhci node for emmc in qdu1000-idp.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Komal Bajaj <quic_kbajaj@quicinc.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qdu1000-idp.dts | 11 +++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qdu1000-idp.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qdu1000-idp.dts
>> index 9e9fd4b8023e..b2526e991548 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qdu1000-idp.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qdu1000-idp.dts
>> @@ -451,3 +451,14 @@
>> &uart7 {
>> status = "okay";
>> };
>> +
>> +&sdhc_1 {
>> + status = "okay";
>> +
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&sdc1_on_state>;
>> + pinctrl-1 = <&sdc1_off_state>;
>> + pinctrl-names = "default", "sleep";
>> +
>> + vmmc-supply = <&vreg_l10a_2p95>;
>> + vqmmc-supply = <&vreg_l7a_1p8>;
>> +};
>
> Again, please follow alphabetical order for adding new node entries.
>
> Also, we have been placing 'status = .. ' entry at the end for new .dts (or .dts entry), but if that is the format used across this board dts
> I am ok with the same.
Komal,
since you're already touching this file, would you mind making a
separate commit moving status last for all nodes?
Konrad
>
> Thanks,
> Bhupesh
On 5/20/2023 4:54 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>
> On 19.05.2023 12:13, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
>> On 5/19/23 2:21 PM, Komal Bajaj wrote:
>>> Add sdhci node for emmc in qdu1000-idp.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Komal Bajaj <quic_kbajaj@quicinc.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qdu1000-idp.dts | 11 +++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qdu1000-idp.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qdu1000-idp.dts
>>> index 9e9fd4b8023e..b2526e991548 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qdu1000-idp.dts
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qdu1000-idp.dts
>>> @@ -451,3 +451,14 @@
>>> &uart7 {
>>> status = "okay";
>>> };
>>> +
>>> +&sdhc_1 {
>>> + status = "okay";
>>> +
>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&sdc1_on_state>;
>>> + pinctrl-1 = <&sdc1_off_state>;
>>> + pinctrl-names = "default", "sleep";
>>> +
>>> + vmmc-supply = <&vreg_l10a_2p95>;
>>> + vqmmc-supply = <&vreg_l7a_1p8>;
>>> +};
>> Again, please follow alphabetical order for adding new node entries.
Noted.
>>
>> Also, we have been placing 'status = .. ' entry at the end for new .dts (or .dts entry), but if that is the format used across this board dts
>> I am ok with the same.
Sure, will move status to end.
> Komal,
>
> since you're already touching this file, would you mind making a
> separate commit moving status last for all nodes?
Hi Konrad,
I don't notice any other nodes whose state is maintained at the
beginning of the node.
Thanks
Komal
>
> Konrad
>> Thanks,
>> Bhupesh
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.