Hi,
在 2023/05/22 20:00, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) 写道:
> On 12.05.23 16:58, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 5/12/23 3:35 AM, Yu Kuai wrote:
>>> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
>>>
>>> Changes in v2:
>>> - make the code more readable for patch 1
>>> - add a new attr_group that is only visible for rq based device
>>> - explain in detail for patch 4
>>> - add review tag for patch 2,3,5
>>>
>>> Yu Kuai (6):
>>> blk-wbt: fix that wbt can't be disabled by default
>>> blk-wbt: don't create wbt sysfs entry if CONFIG_BLK_WBT is disabled
>>> blk-wbt: remove dead code to handle wbt enable/disable with io
>>> inflight
>>> blk-wbt: cleanup rwb_enabled() and wbt_disabled()
>>> blk-iocost: move wbt_enable/disable_default() out of spinlock
>>> blk-sysfs: add a new attr_group for blk_mq
>>>
>>> block/blk-iocost.c | 7 +-
>>> block/blk-sysfs.c | 181 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>>> block/blk-wbt.c | 33 +++------
>>> block/blk-wbt.h | 19 -----
>>> 4 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 123 deletions(-)
>>
>> We need a 6.4 version of the fix to get rid of the regression. If you
>> want to do cleanups on top of that, then that's fine and that can go into
>> 6.5. But don't mix them up.
>
> Hmm, it seems nothing has happened here since ten days to fix this
> regression that likely is still present in 6.3. Yu Kuai, did it fall
> through the cracks, or is what Jens asked for more complicated than it
> sounds?
Sorry for the delay, I was waiting for the last patch to be reviewed.
But the regression is only related to the first patch, I'll send it
seperately.
Thanks,
Kuai
>
> Or was progress made and I just missed it?
>
> Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
> --
> Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
> https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
> If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.
>
> #regzbot poke
>
> .
>