[PATCH v3 1/6] dt-bindings: mailbox: tegra: Document Tegra264 HSP

Peter De Schrijver posted 6 patches 2 years, 9 months ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH v3 1/6] dt-bindings: mailbox: tegra: Document Tegra264 HSP
Posted by Peter De Schrijver 2 years, 9 months ago
Add the compatible string for the HSP block found on the Tegra264 SoC.
The HSP block in Tegra264 is not register compatible with the one in
Tegra194 or Tegra234 hence there is no fallback compatibility string.

Signed-off-by: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/mailbox/nvidia,tegra186-hsp.yaml         | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/nvidia,tegra186-hsp.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/nvidia,tegra186-hsp.yaml
index a3e87516d637..2d14fc948999 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/nvidia,tegra186-hsp.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/nvidia,tegra186-hsp.yaml
@@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ properties:
     oneOf:
       - const: nvidia,tegra186-hsp
       - const: nvidia,tegra194-hsp
+      - const: nvidia,tegra264-hsp
       - items:
           - const: nvidia,tegra234-hsp
           - const: nvidia,tegra194-hsp
-- 
2.34.1
Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] dt-bindings: mailbox: tegra: Document Tegra264 HSP
Posted by Krzysztof Kozlowski 2 years, 9 months ago
On 10/05/2023 16:22, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> Add the compatible string for the HSP block found on the Tegra264 SoC.
> The HSP block in Tegra264 is not register compatible with the one in
> Tegra194 or Tegra234 hence there is no fallback compatibility string.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
> ---


Srsly, all tags ignored...

This is a friendly reminder during the review process.

It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.

If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
versions. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the
tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for acks received on the
version they apply.

https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.17/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L540

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.

Best regards,
Krzysztof