[PATCH] ASoC: nau8825: fix delay time range check

Arnd Bergmann posted 1 patch 2 years, 8 months ago
sound/soc/codecs/nau8825.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
[PATCH] ASoC: nau8825: fix delay time range check
Posted by Arnd Bergmann 2 years, 8 months ago
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

clang points out that the recently added range check is nonsensical:

sound/soc/codecs/nau8825.c:2826:31: error: overlapping comparisons always evaluate to false [-Werror,-Wtautological-overlap-compare]
        if (nau8825->adc_delay < 125 && nau8825->adc_delay > 500)
            ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The DT binding document confirms that the intention is to warn if
it's outside of the 125..500 range, so do that instead.

Fixes: fc0b096c9291 ("ASoC: nau8825: Add delay control for input path")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
 sound/soc/codecs/nau8825.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/nau8825.c b/sound/soc/codecs/nau8825.c
index c4389f5fe603..f4eb999761a4 100644
--- a/sound/soc/codecs/nau8825.c
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/nau8825.c
@@ -2823,7 +2823,7 @@ static int nau8825_read_device_properties(struct device *dev,
 	ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, "nuvoton,adc-delay-ms", &nau8825->adc_delay);
 	if (ret)
 		nau8825->adc_delay = 125;
-	if (nau8825->adc_delay < 125 && nau8825->adc_delay > 500)
+	if (nau8825->adc_delay < 125 || nau8825->adc_delay > 500)
 		dev_warn(dev, "Please set the suitable delay time!\n");
 
 	nau8825->mclk = devm_clk_get(dev, "mclk");
-- 
2.39.2
Re: [PATCH] ASoC: nau8825: fix delay time range check
Posted by Mark Brown 2 years, 8 months ago
On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 01:45:39PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> 
> clang points out that the recently added range check is nonsensical:

Someone already sent a patch for tihs.
Re: [PATCH] ASoC: nau8825: fix delay time range check
Posted by Uwe Kleine-König 2 years, 8 months ago
On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 12:48:52PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 01:45:39PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > 
> > clang points out that the recently added range check is nonsensical:
> 
> Someone already sent a patch for tihs.

FTR: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230418120955.3230705-1-trix@redhat.com

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |