Remove double blank line.

Signed-off-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@foss.st.com>
---

Changes in v2:
- update commit title and commit message to reflect what the change is
  V1="dt-bindings: mfd: stm32: Fix STM32F4 DT include file"

 include/dt-bindings/mfd/stm32f4-rcc.h | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/mfd/stm32f4-rcc.h b/include/dt-bindings/mfd/stm32f4-rcc.h
index 309e8c79f27b..36448a5619a1 100644
--- a/include/dt-bindings/mfd/stm32f4-rcc.h
+++ b/include/dt-bindings/mfd/stm32f4-rcc.h
@@ -34,7 +34,6 @@
 #define STM32F4_AHB1_RESET(bit) (STM32F4_RCC_AHB1_##bit + (0x10 * 8))
 #define STM32F4_AHB1_CLOCK(bit) (STM32F4_RCC_AHB1_##bit)
 
-
 /* AHB2 */
 #define STM32F4_RCC_AHB2_DCMI	0
 #define STM32F4_RCC_AHB2_CRYP	4
-- 
2.25.1

On Mon, 17 Apr 2023, Patrick Delaunay wrote:

> Remove double blank line.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@foss.st.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - update commit title and commit message to reflect what the change is
>   V1="dt-bindings: mfd: stm32: Fix STM32F4 DT include file"
> 
>  include/dt-bindings/mfd/stm32f4-rcc.h | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

Applied, thanks

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]

On 17/04/2023 18:14, Patrick Delaunay wrote:
> Remove double blank line.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@foss.st.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - update commit title and commit message to reflect what the change is
>   V1="dt-bindings: mfd: stm32: Fix STM32F4 DT include fil

More than one file has the same issue. This is quite a churn to handle
such patch one by one. Please fix all of them or just skip, as it is
harmless.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

On Tue, 18 Apr 2023, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

> On 17/04/2023 18:14, Patrick Delaunay wrote:
> > Remove double blank line.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@foss.st.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > Changes in v2:
> > - update commit title and commit message to reflect what the change is
> >   V1="dt-bindings: mfd: stm32: Fix STM32F4 DT include fil
> 
> More than one file has the same issue. This is quite a churn to handle
> such patch one by one. Please fix all of them or just skip, as it is
> harmless.

It was easier to just apply it this time.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]

Hi,

On 4/18/23 09:22, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 17/04/2023 18:14, Patrick Delaunay wrote:
>> Remove double blank line.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@foss.st.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> - update commit title and commit message to reflect what the change is
>>    V1="dt-bindings: mfd: stm32: Fix STM32F4 DT include fil
> More than one file has the same issue. This is quite a churn to handle
> such patch one by one. Please fix all of them or just skip, as it is
> harmless.


To be crystal clear, it is minor difference between files in U-Boot

and in Linux, just because we correct the check-patch errors

when this file for STM32F4 was up streamed in U-Boot.


I prefer correct this line in the Linux file and no having

this difference for each device tree synchronization with U-Boot.


But if you prefer, you can drop this modification and

I will align U-Boot file with this error.


Alexandre: it could part of patch for STM32 files clean-up ?

scripts/checkpatch.pl -f include/dt-bindings/*/*stm*

scripts/checkpatch.pl -f arch/arm/boot/dts/stm*


>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof


Regards

Patrick

On 18/04/2023 15:03, Patrick DELAUNAY wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 4/18/23 09:22, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 17/04/2023 18:14, Patrick Delaunay wrote:
>>> Remove double blank line.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@foss.st.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Changes in v2:
>>> - update commit title and commit message to reflect what the change is
>>>    V1="dt-bindings: mfd: stm32: Fix STM32F4 DT include fil
>> More than one file has the same issue. This is quite a churn to handle
>> such patch one by one. Please fix all of them or just skip, as it is
>> harmless.
> 
> 
> To be crystal clear, it is minor difference between files in U-Boot
> 
> and in Linux, just because we correct the check-patch errors
> 
> when this file for STM32F4 was up streamed in U-Boot.
> 
> 
> I prefer correct this line in the Linux file and no having
> 
> this difference for each device tree synchronization with U-Boot.

I don't know what is there in U-Boot, so my comment was not about it. I
prefer all the files in Linux kernel being correct, but done once for
all. Not once for stm32XX, then later for stm32XY and then stm32XZ...

Best regards,
Krzysztof