From: ZhangPeng <zhangpeng362@huawei.com>

We could use range_in_vma() to check if dst_start, dst_start + len are
within the dst_vma range. Minor readability improvement.

Signed-off-by: ZhangPeng <zhangpeng362@huawei.com>
---
 mm/userfaultfd.c | 6 +-----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/userfaultfd.c b/mm/userfaultfd.c
index 11cfd82c6726..e97a0b4889fc 100644
--- a/mm/userfaultfd.c
+++ b/mm/userfaultfd.c
@@ -31,11 +31,7 @@ struct vm_area_struct *find_dst_vma(struct mm_struct *dst_mm,
 	struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma;
 
 	dst_vma = find_vma(dst_mm, dst_start);
-	if (!dst_vma)
-		return NULL;
-
-	if (dst_start < dst_vma->vm_start ||
-	    dst_start + len > dst_vma->vm_end)
+	if (!range_in_vma(dst_vma, dst_start, dst_start + len))
 		return NULL;
 
 	/*
-- 
2.25.1

On 17.04.23 02:39, Peng Zhang wrote:
> From: ZhangPeng <zhangpeng362@huawei.com>
> 
> We could use range_in_vma() to check if dst_start, dst_start + len are
> within the dst_vma range. Minor readability improvement.
> 
> Signed-off-by: ZhangPeng <zhangpeng362@huawei.com>
> ---
>   mm/userfaultfd.c | 6 +-----
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/userfaultfd.c b/mm/userfaultfd.c
> index 11cfd82c6726..e97a0b4889fc 100644
> --- a/mm/userfaultfd.c
> +++ b/mm/userfaultfd.c
> @@ -31,11 +31,7 @@ struct vm_area_struct *find_dst_vma(struct mm_struct *dst_mm,
>   	struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma;
>   
>   	dst_vma = find_vma(dst_mm, dst_start);
> -	if (!dst_vma)
> -		return NULL;
> -
> -	if (dst_start < dst_vma->vm_start ||
> -	    dst_start + len > dst_vma->vm_end)
> +	if (!range_in_vma(dst_vma, dst_start, dst_start + len))
>   		return NULL;
>   
>   	/*

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb