The lsm303d can be found as ACCL0001 on various Lenovo devices,
including the Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 1051-F, where I tested this
patch.
Signed-off-by: Marius Hoch <mail@mariushoch.de>
---
drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm9ds0/st_lsm9ds0_i2c.c | 7 +++++++
drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm9ds0/st_lsm9ds0_spi.c | 7 +++++++
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm9ds0/st_lsm9ds0_i2c.c b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm9ds0/st_lsm9ds0_i2c.c
index 64fa77d302e2..52f1ea6c457f 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm9ds0/st_lsm9ds0_i2c.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm9ds0/st_lsm9ds0_i2c.c
@@ -37,6 +37,12 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id st_lsm9ds0_id_table[] = {
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, st_lsm9ds0_id_table);
+static const struct acpi_device_id st_lsm9ds0_acpi_match[] = {
+ {"ACCL0001", (kernel_ulong_t)LSM303D_IMU_DEV_NAME},
+ { },
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, st_lsm9ds0_acpi_match);
+
static const struct regmap_config st_lsm9ds0_regmap_config = {
.reg_bits = 8,
.val_bits = 8,
@@ -73,6 +79,7 @@ static struct i2c_driver st_lsm9ds0_driver = {
.driver = {
.name = "st-lsm9ds0-i2c",
.of_match_table = st_lsm9ds0_of_match,
+ .acpi_match_table = st_lsm9ds0_acpi_match,
},
.probe_new = st_lsm9ds0_i2c_probe,
.id_table = st_lsm9ds0_id_table,
diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm9ds0/st_lsm9ds0_spi.c b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm9ds0/st_lsm9ds0_spi.c
index 997b5ff792be..55f3738193af 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm9ds0/st_lsm9ds0_spi.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm9ds0/st_lsm9ds0_spi.c
@@ -37,6 +37,12 @@ static const struct spi_device_id st_lsm9ds0_id_table[] = {
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(spi, st_lsm9ds0_id_table);
+static const struct acpi_device_id st_lsm9ds0_acpi_match[] = {
+ {"ACCL0001", (kernel_ulong_t)LSM303D_IMU_DEV_NAME},
+ { },
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, st_lsm9ds0_acpi_match);
+
static const struct regmap_config st_lsm9ds0_regmap_config = {
.reg_bits = 8,
.val_bits = 8,
@@ -72,6 +78,7 @@ static struct spi_driver st_lsm9ds0_driver = {
.driver = {
.name = "st-lsm9ds0-spi",
.of_match_table = st_lsm9ds0_of_match,
+ .acpi_match_table = st_lsm9ds0_acpi_match,
},
.probe = st_lsm9ds0_spi_probe,
.id_table = st_lsm9ds0_id_table,
--
2.39.2
Hi,
On 16/04/2023 01:11, Marius Hoch wrote:
<snip>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm9ds0/st_lsm9ds0_spi.c b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm9ds0/st_lsm9ds0_spi.c
> index 997b5ff792be..55f3738193af 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm9ds0/st_lsm9ds0_spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm9ds0/st_lsm9ds0_spi.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,12 @@ static const struct spi_device_id st_lsm9ds0_id_table[] = {
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(spi, st_lsm9ds0_id_table);
>
> +static const struct acpi_device_id st_lsm9ds0_acpi_match[] = {
> + {"ACCL0001", (kernel_ulong_t)LSM303D_IMU_DEV_NAME},
> + { },
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, st_lsm9ds0_acpi_match);
> +
> static const struct regmap_config st_lsm9ds0_regmap_config = {
> .reg_bits = 8,
> .val_bits = 8,
> @@ -72,6 +78,7 @@ static struct spi_driver st_lsm9ds0_driver = {
> .driver = {
> .name = "st-lsm9ds0-spi",
> .of_match_table = st_lsm9ds0_of_match,
> + .acpi_match_table = st_lsm9ds0_acpi_match,
> },
> .probe = st_lsm9ds0_spi_probe,
> .id_table = st_lsm9ds0_id_table,
I just realized that these changes (the SPI ones, not the I2C ones) are
entirely superfluous, and I'm not sure why I added this in the first
place. In the Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 series (which seem to be the only
devices exposing this as "ACCL0001"), the device is accessible via I2C.
Just to make sure, I re-tested the patch chain without this change.
@Jonathan: Shall I upload an entirely new patch set (v4), do this in a
separate new clean up commit, or do you want to just drop these changes
to drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm9ds0/st_lsm9ds0_spi.c? I'm fine with any of
these options.
Cheers,
Marius
On Tue, 2 May 2023 16:51:42 +0200
Marius Hoch <mail@mariushoch.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 16/04/2023 01:11, Marius Hoch wrote:
> <snip>
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm9ds0/st_lsm9ds0_spi.c b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm9ds0/st_lsm9ds0_spi.c
> > index 997b5ff792be..55f3738193af 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm9ds0/st_lsm9ds0_spi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm9ds0/st_lsm9ds0_spi.c
> > @@ -37,6 +37,12 @@ static const struct spi_device_id st_lsm9ds0_id_table[] = {
> > };
> > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(spi, st_lsm9ds0_id_table);
> >
> > +static const struct acpi_device_id st_lsm9ds0_acpi_match[] = {
> > + {"ACCL0001", (kernel_ulong_t)LSM303D_IMU_DEV_NAME},
> > + { },
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, st_lsm9ds0_acpi_match);
> > +
> > static const struct regmap_config st_lsm9ds0_regmap_config = {
> > .reg_bits = 8,
> > .val_bits = 8,
> > @@ -72,6 +78,7 @@ static struct spi_driver st_lsm9ds0_driver = {
> > .driver = {
> > .name = "st-lsm9ds0-spi",
> > .of_match_table = st_lsm9ds0_of_match,
> > + .acpi_match_table = st_lsm9ds0_acpi_match,
> > },
> > .probe = st_lsm9ds0_spi_probe,
> > .id_table = st_lsm9ds0_id_table,
> I just realized that these changes (the SPI ones, not the I2C ones) are
> entirely superfluous, and I'm not sure why I added this in the first
> place. In the Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 series (which seem to be the only
> devices exposing this as "ACCL0001"), the device is accessible via I2C.
> Just to make sure, I re-tested the patch chain without this change.
>
> @Jonathan: Shall I upload an entirely new patch set (v4), do this in a
> separate new clean up commit, or do you want to just drop these changes
> to drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm9ds0/st_lsm9ds0_spi.c? I'm fine with any of
> these options.
I'll drop it and push out a new version of the togreg tree.
Thanks for pointing this out.
Jonathan
>
> Cheers,
> Marius
On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 1:12 AM Marius Hoch <mail@mariushoch.de> wrote: > The lsm303d can be found as ACCL0001 on various Lenovo devices, > including the Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 1051-F, where I tested this > patch. > > Signed-off-by: Marius Hoch <mail@mariushoch.de> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Yours, Linus Walleij
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.