All I2C nodes were disabled in SOC dts file and in board
dts needed nodes were enabled.
This patch enables wkup_i2c0 node in board dts file.

Fixes: a9ed915cd55c ("arm64: dts: ti: k3-j7200: Enable I2C nodes at the board level")

Signed-off-by: Udit Kumar <u-kumar1@ti.com>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-common-proc-board.dts | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-common-proc-board.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-common-proc-board.dts
index 63633e4f6c59..e66bbfe65ff2 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-common-proc-board.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-common-proc-board.dts
@@ -254,6 +254,10 @@ exp3: gpio@20 {
 	};
 };
 
+&wkup_i2c0 {
+	status = "okay";
+};
+
 &main_sdhci0 {
 	/* eMMC */
 	non-removable;
-- 
2.34.1

On 23:44-20230414, Udit Kumar wrote:
> All I2C nodes were disabled in SOC dts file and in board
> dts needed nodes were enabled.
redundant.

> This patch enables wkup_i2c0 node in board dts file.
> 
> Fixes: a9ed915cd55c ("arm64: dts: ti: k3-j7200: Enable I2C nodes at the board level")


This should'nt be fixing the commit - the commit is correct in the sense
that if the board does'nt describe a node with pinmux, the i2c is'nt
functional in the first place.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Udit Kumar <u-kumar1@ti.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-common-proc-board.dts | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-common-proc-board.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-common-proc-board.dts
> index 63633e4f6c59..e66bbfe65ff2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-common-proc-board.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-common-proc-board.dts
> @@ -254,6 +254,10 @@ exp3: gpio@20 {
>  	};
>  };
>  
> +&wkup_i2c0 {
> +	status = "okay";

How about the pinmux? speed? what peripheral is on the wakeup i2c?

	Do we have an eeprom or something here?

> +};
> +
>  &main_sdhci0 {
>  	/* eMMC */
>  	non-removable;
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3  1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D

Hi Nishanth

On 4/14/2023 11:54 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 23:44-20230414, Udit Kumar wrote:
>> All I2C nodes were disabled in SOC dts file and in board
>> dts needed nodes were enabled.
> redundant.

ok


>
>> This patch enables wkup_i2c0 node in board dts file.
>>
>> Fixes: a9ed915cd55c ("arm64: dts: ti: k3-j7200: Enable I2C nodes at the board level")
>
> This should'nt be fixing the commit - the commit is correct in the sense
> that if the board does'nt describe a node with pinmux, the i2c is'nt
> functional in the first place.

well, how i look at before this patch each i2c was functional.

this fix is making needed i2c as disabled, however this fix is correct

I am ok to remove Fixes

>> Signed-off-by: Udit Kumar <u-kumar1@ti.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-common-proc-board.dts | 4 ++++
>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-common-proc-board.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-common-proc-board.dts
>> index 63633e4f6c59..e66bbfe65ff2 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-common-proc-board.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-common-proc-board.dts
>> @@ -254,6 +254,10 @@ exp3: gpio@20 {
>>   	};
>>   };
>>   
>> +&wkup_i2c0 {
>> +	status = "okay";
> How about the pinmux? speed? what peripheral is on the wakeup i2c?
>
> 	Do we have an eeprom or something here?


This got eeprom and PMIC,

eeprom read is ok with pin mux and speed.

if you want to specify, let me know

>> +};
>> +
>>   &main_sdhci0 {
>>   	/* eMMC */
>>   	non-removable;
>> -- 
>> 2.34.1
>>

On 09:36-20230415, Kumar, Udit wrote:
[...]

> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-common-proc-board.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-common-proc-board.dts
> > > index 63633e4f6c59..e66bbfe65ff2 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-common-proc-board.dts
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-common-proc-board.dts
> > > @@ -254,6 +254,10 @@ exp3: gpio@20 {
> > >   	};
> > >   };
> > > +&wkup_i2c0 {
> > > +	status = "okay";
> > How about the pinmux? speed? what peripheral is on the wakeup i2c?
> > 
> > 	Do we have an eeprom or something here?
> 
> 
> This got eeprom and PMIC,
> 
> eeprom read is ok with pin mux and speed.
> 
> if you want to specify, let me know

yes, you must specify eeprom at least. I understand pmic is in
discussion atm [1], So, that can be resolved seperately.

Also if the eeprom is on the SoM, you should add this in the SoM dtsi,
not the baseboard dtsi.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/714a56b1-438c-7aad-920b-f3f1d72afc5f@linaro.org/
-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3  1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D